UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  x                Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨  Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x  Definitive Proxy Statement
¨  Definitive Additional Materials
¨  Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12
RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x  No fee required.
¨  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

  (1)  

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

    

 

  (2)  

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

    

 

  (3)  

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

    

 

  (4)  

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

    

 

  (5)  

Total fee paid:

 

    

 

¨  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
¨  

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

  (1)  

Amount Previously Paid:

��

    

 

  (2)  

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

    

 

  (3)  

Filing Party:

 

    

 

  (4)  

Date Filed:

 

    

 

 

 

 


LOGO

Resolute Forest Products Inc.

111 Duke Street,Robert-Bourassa Boulevard, Suite 5000

Montréal, QuébecMontreal, Quebec

Canada H3C 2M1 Canada

April 13, 20169, 2021

Dear Stockholder:

We cordially invite you to attend the annual meeting of stockholders of Resolute Forest Products Inc. to be held online through a virtual web conference at https://web.lumiagm.com/295854943 on Wednesday, June 1, 2016,Friday, May 21, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. (Eastern),. The annual meeting is being held entirely online due to the public health impact of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) and to allow us to continue to proceed with the meeting while mitigating health and safety risks to participants. You will be able to attend and participate in the Espace Alcoaannual meeting online at https://web.lumiagm.com/295854943 where you will be able to listen to the Centre des arts de Baie-Comeau, 1660 de Bretagne, in Baie-Comeau, Québec, Canada. meeting live, submit questions and vote your shares.

The accompanying notice of annual meetinginternet availability of proxy materials provides you with information on how to access the proxy materials and proxy statement containobtain the details of the business to be conducted at the meeting.

In addition to the formal items of business to be brought before the meeting, we will report on our business and respond to stockholder questions.

Whether or not you plan to attend online, you can ensure that your shares are represented at the meeting by promptly voting and submitting your proxy or voting instruction card by telephoneinternet or, by Internet orif you have requested to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials, by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy form in the enclosed envelope. You will find the proxy card or voting instruction card by accessing the internet websites mentioned on the notice of internet availability and by following the instructions thereon.

Resolute’s annual report for 20152020 is includedavailable by internet or by mail in this package,accordance with the instructions found on the notice of internet availability, and we urge you to read it carefully.

We look forward to seeing youyour attendance at the annual meeting.

Sincerely,

 

LOGOLOGO

Richard GarneauRemi G. Lalonde

President and chief executive officer

 

LOGO

Bradley P. Martin

Chair of the board


LOGO

Resolute Forest Products Inc.

111 Duke Street,Robert-Bourassa Boulevard, Suite 5000

Montréal, QuébecMontreal, Quebec

Canada H3C 2M1 Canada

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JUNE 1, 2016MAY 21, 2021

April 13, 20169, 2021

Dear Stockholder:

The 20162021 annual meeting of stockholders of Resolute Forest Products Inc. will be held online through a virtual web conference at https://web.lumiagm.com/295854943 on Wednesday, June 1, 2016,Friday, May 21, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. (Eastern), in the Espace Alcoa at the Centre des arts de Baie-Comeau, 1660 de Bretagne, inBaie-Comeau, Québec, Canada, for the purpose of voting on the following matters:

 

 1.

the election of directors for the ensuing year;

 

 2.

the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 20162021 fiscal year;

 

 3.

an advisory vote to approve executive compensation, or the “say-on-pay” vote; and

 

 4.

such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

The record date for the determination of the stockholders entitled to vote at our annual meeting, and any adjournment or postponement thereof, is the close of business on April 8, 2016.March 23, 2021.

Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the annual meeting of

stockholders to be held on June 1, 2016:May 21, 2021:

The proxy statement and our 20152020 annual report are available at

http:// www.edocumentview.com/RFP.www.astproxyportal.com/AST/RFP_EN.

The annual meeting is being held entirely online due to the public health impact of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) and to allow us to proceed with the meeting while mitigating health and safety risks to participants. You will be able to attend and participate in the annual meeting online at https://web.lumiagm.com/295854943, where you will be able to listen to the meeting live, submit questions and vote your shares. You may also forward your questions in advance to ir@resolutefp.com, and the company will respond to as many appropriate questions as time permits during the meeting, to the extent relevant to the business of the meeting. Please make sure your email clearly identifies your name and whether you are a stockholder. To join the annual meeting, you will need to have your 11- or 13-digit control number, which is included on your notice of internet availability and proxy card and the following password: resolute2021. If you are not a stockholder of record, you must obtain a legal proxy from your intermediary institution and contact our transfer agent at proxy@astfinancial.com, at least five business days prior to May 21, 2021, to secure a proxy card with the 11- or 13-digit control number in order to vote your shares at the annual meeting.

By order of the board of directors,

 

LOGO

Jacques P. Vachon

Corporate secretary

April 13, 2016 Montréal, Québec,9, 2021, Montreal, Quebec, Canada


TABLEOF CONTENTS

 

Questions and Answers About the Annual General Meeting and Voting

   1 

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

4

Corporate Governance Principles

4

Director Independence

5

Code of Conduct

   6 

Board Leadership Structure; Communication with Independent DirectorsCorporate Governance Principles

6

Director Independence

   7 

Board’s Role in Risk OversightCode of Conduct

7

Director Qualifications and Nomination Process

   8 

Meetings and CommitteesBoard Leadership Structure; Communication with Independent Directors

8

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

   9 

Director CompensationQualifications, Nomination Process and Diversity Policy

   1210 

Related Party TransactionsMeetings and Committees

   1711 

ExecutiveDirector Compensation

   1814 

Cash Component

15

Equity Award Component

16

Related Party Transactions

19

Executive Compensation

20

Compensation Discussion & Analysis

   1820 

Other Compensation Committee ReportPolicies

   3032 

Compensation Committee Report

33

Tabular Disclosure of Executive Compensation

   3134 

Equity Awards

38

Compensation Risk Assessment

40

Pension Benefits

   41 

DC Make-Up ProgramCompensation Risk Assessment

   43 

Severance and Change in Control ArrangementsPension Benefits

   43 

Information on Stock OwnershipSeverance and Change in Control Arrangements

46

CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure

   50 

Management ProposalsInformation on Stock Ownership

   5251 

Management Proposals

53

Item 1 – Vote on the Election of Directors

   5253 

Item 2 – Vote on the Ratification of the Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

   57 

Item 3 – Advisory voteVote to approve executive compensationApprove Executive Compensation

   58 

Audit Committee Report

   59 

Delinquent Section 16 Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance16(a) Reports

59

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

59

Other Business

   60 

Stockholder Proposals for Inclusion in Next Year’s ProxyCompensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

   60 

Stockholder Proposals for 2017 Annual MeetingOther Business

   60 

Stockholder Proposals for Inclusion in Next Year’s Proxy

60

Stockholder Proposals for 2022 Annual Meeting

60

Additional Information

   60 


PROXY STATEMENT

This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by Resolute Forest Products Inc. on behalf of our board of directors for the 20162021 annual meeting of stockholders. The annual meeting will be held online through a virtual web conference at https://web.lumiagm.com/295854943 on Wednesday, June 1, 2016,Friday, May 21, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. (Eastern), in the Espace Alcoa at the Centre des arts de Baie-Comeau, 1660 de Bretagne, in Baie-Comeau, Québec, Canada.. Proxy materials for the annual meeting are being mailed or will be made available on or about April 27, 2016.9, 2021.

When we use the terms “Resolute,” “the Company,company,” “we,” “us” and “our,” we mean Resolute Forest Products Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.

Except for documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the “SEC” and expressly incorporated by reference in this proxy statement, the information on the company’s website is not a part of, and is not incorporated by reference in this proxy statement.

QUESTIONSAND ANSWERS ABOUTTHE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETINGAND VOTING

What is the notice of internet availability and why did I not receive a full set of proxy materials?

Notice and Access Rules adopted by the SEC, allow companies to choose the method for delivering proxy materials to stockholders. We have again elected this year to use the Notice and Access Rules and therefore to mail a notice regarding the availability of proxy materials on the internet (the “notice of internet availability”) instead of sending a full set of proxy materials in the mail to our stockholders. This notice of internet availability will be mailed to our stockholders approximately on April 9, 2021, and our proxy materials will be posted on both our corporate website (www.resolutefp.com/Investors/Financial_Reports), the website referenced in the notice of internet availability as well as on http://www.astproxyportal.com/AST/RFP_EN on the same day. Utilizing this method of delivery expedites receipt of proxy materials by our stockholders and lowers the cost of the annual meeting. If you are a stockholder and would like to receive a paper or email copy of the proxy materials, you should follow the instructions in the notice of internet availability for requesting copies.

Who is entitled to vote at the annual meeting?

Owners of Resolute’s common stock at the close of business on April 8, 2016,March 23, 2021, the record date for the annual meeting, are entitled to receive the notice of annual meetinginternet availability and to vote their shares at the meeting. On that date, there were 89,513,33479,830,748 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote and there were 3,279 holders of record.vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each matter to be voted on at the annual meeting.

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and through an intermediary?

You are a stockholder of record if you own shares of common stock that are registered in your name with our transfer agent, ComputershareAmerican Stock Transfer & Trust Company, N.A.LLC. If you are a stockholder of record, the transfer agent is sending these proxy materialsthe notice of internet availability to you directly. As a stockholder of record, you may vote at the annual meeting by attending the annual meeting online and following the instructions posted at https://web.lumiagm.com/295854943, or you may vote by proxy. To join the annual meeting, you will need to have your 11- or 13-digit control number, which is included on your notice of internet availability and proxy card and the following password: resolute2021.

If you hold shares of common stock indirectly through a broker, bank or similar institution (which we refer to as an “intermediary institution”), you are a “street name” holder and these materials arethe notice of internet availability is being sent to you by the intermediary institution through which you hold your shares. If you provide specific voting instructions by mail, telephone or the Internet,internet, your intermediary institution will vote your shares as you have directed. You are also invited to attend the annual meeting online at https://web.lumiagm.com/295854943. However, since you are not a stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares at the annual meeting by

attending the meeting online unless you request and obtain a legal proxy from your intermediary institution. If you obtain a legal proxy from your intermediary institution, you must contact our transfer agent at proxy@astfinancial.com at least five business days prior to May 21, 2021, to secure a proxy card with the 11- or 13-digit control number in order to vote. To join the annual meeting, you will also need the following password: resolute2021.

What do I need to do to attend the annual meeting?

Attendance atThe annual meeting is being held entirely online due to the public health impact of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) and to allow us to proceed with the meeting while mitigating health and safety risks to participants. Stockholders of record as of March 23, 2021, will be able to attend and participate in the annual meeting online by accessing https://web.lumiagm.com/295854943. To join the annual meeting, you will need to have your 11- or 13-digit control number, which is generally limited to our stockholdersincluded on your notice of internet availability and their authorized representatives. All stockholders must bring an acceptable form of identification, like a driver’s license, to attendproxy card and the meeting in person. Iffollowing password: resolute2021.

Even if you hold your shares in street name and youdo plan to attend the annual meeting you must bring an account statement or other suitable evidenceonline, we recommend that you held shares of common stockalso vote by proxy as described herein as early as possible so that your vote will be counted if you decide not to attend the annual meeting.

An audio recording of the record dateannual meeting will be available on our annual meeting website at www.resolutefp.com/Investors after the meeting.

Access to the Audio Webcast. The live audio webcast of the annual meeting will begin promptly at 9:00 a.m. (Eastern) on May 21, 2021. Online access to the audio webcast will be admittedavailable approximately 60 minutes prior to the start of the annual meeting to allow time for you to log in and test the system. To attend the online annual meeting, you will need to log in at https://web.lumiagm.com/295854943. You will need your unique 11- or 13-digit control number, which appears on your notice of internet availability and the following password: resolute2021. In the event that you do not have a control number, please contact your intermediary institution as soon as possible, so that you can be provided with a control number and gain access to the meeting. For directionsPlease monitor our annual meeting website at www.resolutefp.com/Investors for any updates regarding our online annual meeting.

Submitting Questions. We will hold a live question and answer session in connection with the annual meeting. Stockholders may submit questions via our virtual shareholder meeting website at https://web.lumiagm.com/295854943. We intend to answer properly submitted questions that are pertinent to the annualcompany and the meeting you may contact our investor relations department by following the instructions on our website at www.resolutefp.com/investors.

Any representative of a stockholder who wishes to attend must present acceptable documentation evidencing his or her authority, suitable evidence of ownership by the stockholder of common stockmatters, as described above and an acceptable form of identification. Wetime permits. However, we reserve the right to limitedit profanity or other inappropriate language, or to exclude questions that are not pertinent to meeting matters or that are otherwise inappropriate. Questions and answers will be grouped by topic and substantially similar questions will be grouped and answered once. You may also forward your questions in advance to ir@resolutefp.com, and the numbercompany will respond to as many appropriate questions as time permits during the meeting, to the extent relevant to the business of representativesthe meeting. Please make sure your email clearly identifies your name and whether you are a stockholder.

Technical Assistance. If you experience technical difficulties joining the annual meeting or during the meeting please call (877) 283-0324 (toll free for any stockholder who may attendCanada and the meeting.U.S.) or (718) 921-8300 for assistance.

What methods can I use to vote?

If you are a registered holder, you may vote:

 

 

By mail. If you would like to receive a paper copy of the proxy card, you should follow the instructions on the notice of internet availability for requesting copies. Complete, sign and date the printed proxy card or voting instruction card and return it in the pre-paid envelope enclosed with these materials.that will be accompanying the proxy card.

 

By telephone or Internetinternet. You can vote over the telephone by calling 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within Canada, the U.S. and its territories, 1-781-575-2300 outside Canada, the U.S. and its territories or through the Internetinternet at www.envisionreports.com/RFP.www.voteproxy.com. The telephone and Internetinternet voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders’ identities, to allow stockholders to vote their shares and to confirm that their instructions have been recorded properly. Voting will be open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, but proxies submitted using these methods must be received by 1:00 a.m. (Central)11:59 p.m. (Eastern) on June 1, 2016.May 20, 2021.

 

 

In personBy attending the meeting online. You canmay vote in persononline at the meeting. See What do Iannual meeting by attending the annual meeting online and following the instructions posted at https://web.lumiagm.com/295854943. To join the annual meeting, you will need to do to attendhave your 11- or 13-digit control number and the annual meeting?following password: resolute2021.

If you are a street name holder, you may vote:

 

 

By mail. By returningIf you would like to receive a properly executed and datedpaper copy of the voting instruction form, by mail, depending uponyou should follow the method(s) your intermediary makes available.instructions on the notice of internet availability for requesting copies. Complete, sign and date the voting instruction form and return it in the pre-paid envelope enclosed that will be accompanying the voting instruction form.

 

 

By telephone or Internetinternet. You can vote over the telephone or through the Internetinternet at the number and website address indicated in your intermediary institution’s voting instructions.instructions on the notice of internet availability. The telephone and Internetinternet voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders’ identities, to allow stockholders to vote their shares and to confirm that their instructions have been recorded properly.

 

 

In personBy attending the meeting online. You canIf your shares are held by an intermediary institution, you are considered the beneficial owner of the shares. If you are a beneficial owner, you are invited to attend the annual meeting online. Since a beneficial owner is not a stockholder of record, you may not vote in personyour shares online at the annual meeting ifunless you bringobtain a valid “legallegal proxy” which from the intermediary institution that holds your shares that gives you canthe right to vote at the annual meeting. If you obtain a legal proxy from your intermediary institution, through which you hold your shares. See What do I needmust contact our transfer agent at proxy@astfinancial.com at least five business days prior to doMay 21, 2021, to attendsecure a proxy card with the 11- or 13-digit control number in order to vote. To join the annual meeting?meeting, you will also need the following password: resolute2021.

What is a broker non-vote?

If you are a street name holder, you must instruct your intermediary institution how to vote your shares. If you do not, your shares will not be voted on any proposal for which the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote, which is referred to as a “broker non-vote. In these cases, the broker can register your shares as being “present and entitled to vote” for purposes of determining the quorum but will not be able to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required under, in accordance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, or “NYSE.. Under those rules, your intermediary institution has discretionary voting authority to vote your shares on the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, even if it does not receive voting instructions from you. But the election of directors and the advisory say-on-pay vote are non-discretionary items, and they may not be voted upon by your broker without specific voting instructions from you. Accordingly, your shares would not be voted on these matters.

Is there a list of stockholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting?

A list of stockholders of record entitled to vote at the meeting will be available for inspection at the meeting and for the ten days before the meeting for any purpose germane to the meeting during ordinary business hours at Resolute Forest Products Inc., 111 Duke Street,Robert-Bourassa Boulevard, Suite 5000, Montréal, Québec, CanadaMontreal, Quebec, H3C 2M1, Canada from May 22, 2016,10, 2021, through May 31, 2016.20, 2021. During the annual meeting, the list of stockholders of record entitled to vote at the meeting will be available for inspection upon request at https://web.lumiagm.com/295854943.

What is the quorum for the annual meeting?

The presence of the holders of shares of common stock representing at least one-third of the voting power of all common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting, in personparticipating online at

https://web.lumiagm.com/295854943 or by proxy, is necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the annual meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are considered present for purposes of determining a quorum.

How will my shares be voted at the annual meeting?

At the meeting, the persons named in the proxy card or, if applicable, their substitute(s) will vote your shares as you instruct. If you sign your proxy card and return it without indicating how you would like to vote your shares, your shares will be voted:

 

FOR the election of each director nominee;

FOR the proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm; and

 

FOR the advisory resolution approving executive compensation.

Can I revoke my proxy?

If you are a stockholder of record, you can revoke your proxy before it is exercised by:

 

giving written notice to the Company’scompany’s corporate secretary;

 

delivering a valid, later-dated proxy, or later-dated vote by telephone or on the Internet,internet, before the annual meeting; or

 

voting in person atattending the annual meeting.meeting online and voting by following the instructions at https://web.lumiagm.com/295854943. To join the annual meeting, you will need to have your 11- or 13-digit control number and the following password: resolute2021.

If you are a street name holder, you can submit new voting instructions by contacting your intermediary institution. All shares for which proxies have been properly submitted and not revoked will be voted at the annual meeting.

What are the voting requirements for the approval of each matter presented at the annual meeting?

 

 

Election of directors. Since the number of nominees for director is the same as the number of positions on the board to be filled, election of directors at this annual meeting is deemed “non-contested.“non-contested. As a result, under our by-laws, as amended in December 2014, directors are elected by a majority vote. An incumbent director nominee who does not receive a majority of the votes cast in a non-contested election shall tender his or her resignation to the board. Under our by-laws, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be considered “cast” in the election of directors, and, as a result, will not affect the outcome of the director election.

 

 

Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. The ratification of the appointment of an independent registered public accounting firm is not required under our by-laws, but we are asking as a matter of good governance. A majority of the votes present and entitled to vote at the meeting must vote to approve the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered accounting firm for the 20162021 fiscal year for the ratification to pass. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal.

 

 

Advisory vote on executive compensation. Under our by-laws, in order for it to pass, a majority of the votes present and entitled to vote at the meeting must vote to adopt, on an advisory basis, the resolution approving compensation of our named executive officers. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. Broker non-votes will not be considered “entitled to vote” on this matter and, as a result, will not affect the outcome of the vote.

Will my vote be confidential?

Yes. We have a policy of confidentiality in the voting of stockholder proxies. Individual stockholder votes are kept confidential, unless disclosure is necessary to meet applicable legal requirements to assert or defend claims for or against the Companycompany or made during a contested proxy solicitation, tender offer or other change of control situation.

Who will pay for the cost of this proxy solicitation?

We will pay the cost of soliciting proxies for the annual meeting. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, solicitation may be made by certain of our directors, officers or employees telephonically, electronically or by other means of communication. Our directors, officers and employees will receive no additional compensation for any such solicitation. We will reimburse brokers and other similar institutions for costs incurred by them in mailing proxy materials to beneficial owners.

What information is available via the Internet?internet?

These documents can be found at www.edocumentview.com/RFP:http://www.astproxyportal.com/AST/RFP_EN:

 

notice of annual meeting;

 

proxy statement;

2015 annual report; and

 

form of proxy.2020 annual report.

Your proxy card or voting information form can also be found at the internet address mentioned on the notice of internet availability.

Can I obtain printed materials of the proxy materials?

Yes, follow the instructions on the notice of internet availability to receive printed proxy materials in time enough to vote your shares.

What should I do if I receive more than one set of votingproxy materials?

You may receive more than one set of voting materials, including multiple copies of this proxy statement and multiple proxy cards or voting instruction cards.materials. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you will receive a separate voting instruction cardproxy materials for each brokerage account in which you hold shares. If you are a stockholder of record and your shares are registered in more than one name, you may receive more than one set of proxy card.materials. Please complete, sign, date and return by mail, or submit viafollow the Internet or by telephone,instructions on each proxy card and voting instruction cardof the notices of internet availability that you receive.receive in order to vote all of your shares. If you would like to consolidate multiple accounts at our transfer agent, please contact ComputershareAmerican Stock Transfer & Trust Company, N.A.LLC at (866) 820-6919(877) 283-0324 (toll free for Canada and the U.S.) or (781) 575-3100.(718) 921-8300.

What is “householding” and how does it affect me?

We have adopted a procedure, approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the “SEC,,” called “householding,” pursuant to which stockholders of record who have the same address and last name and do not participate in electronic delivery of proxy materials will receive only one copyset of the notice of annual meeting, proxy statement and our 2015 annual report,materials, unless we are notified that one or more of these stockholders wishes to continue receiving individual copies. This procedure will reduce our printing costs and postage fees.

Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards.notices of internet availability. Householding would not in any way affect dividend check mailings, if any. If you participate in householding

and wish to receive a separate copy of this notice of annual meeting and proxy statement,materials, or if you do not wish to continue to participate in householding and prefer to receive separate copies of these documents in the future, please contact our transfer agent.agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, at (877) 283-0324 (toll free for Canada and the U.S.) or (718) 921-8300 (800- 937-5449 or 718-921-8300), or at 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn NY 11219. If you are a street name holder, you can request information about householding from your intermediary institution.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEAND BOARD MATTERS

Corporate Governance Principles

The board has adopted a formal set of corporate governance principles and practices, which we refer to as the “corporate governance principles.” The purpose of the corporate governance principles, which are available on our website (www.resolutefp.com/about_us/corporate_governance), is to provide a structure within which directors can effectively pursue the Company’scompany’s objectives for the benefit of stockholders and supervise the management of the Company.company. The corporate governance principles are guidelines intended to serve as a flexible framework within which the board may conduct its business, and not as a set of legally binding obligations.

The corporate governance principles outline the board’s responsibilities and the interplay among the board and its committees in furthering the Company’scompany’s overall objectives. The corporate governance principles note the board’s role in advising management on significant issues facing the Companycompany and in reviewing and approving significant actions. In addition, the corporate governance principles highlight the principal roles of certain committees of the board, including:

 

the board’s selection and evaluation of senior executive officers, including the president and chief executive officer, with assistance from the human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee, and succession planning;

the administration of executive and director compensation by the human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee, with final approval of chief executive officer and director compensation by the board;

 

the selection and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm and oversight of public financial reporting by the audit committee; and

 

the evaluation of candidates for board membership and the oversight of the structure and practices of the board, the committees and corporate governance matters in general by the human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee, including annual assessment (collectively and on an individual basis) of board and committee effectiveness.

Our corporate governance principles also include, among other things:

 

general qualifications for board membership, including independence requirements (with, among other things, the categorical standards for board determinations of independence);

 

director responsibilities, including board and stockholder meeting attendance and advance review of meeting materials;

 

provisions for director access to management and independent advisors, and for director orientation and continuing education; and

 

an outline of management’s responsibilities, including production of financial reports and disclosures, implementation and monitoring of internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures, development, presentation and implementation of strategic plans and setting a strong ethical “tone at the top.”

In 2020, the board adopted a formal written diversity policy both at board level and executive level. See “Director Qualifications, Nomination Process and Diversity Policy” below.

Director Independence

The Company’scompany’s corporate governance principles also include standards concerning the independence of board members. Those standards are designed to comply with those established by the SEC and the NYSE. They include the following:

 

Each member of the board, except for the president and chief executive officer and, at the discretion of the board, up to two additional directors, must be independent. The definition of independence is based on the NYSE’s corporate governance standards, which also require a majority of directors to be independent, and rules established by the SEC.

 

Each member of the audit committee and the human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee must be independent.

 

The independent directors must meet in executive session at least annually without any non-independent director or executive officer. The independent directors will also meet in executive session at the end of any board meeting at the request of any independent director. The lead director presides at these meetings.

On the basis of information solicited from each director, and upon the advice and recommendation of our human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee, the board has determined that sevenat the date of this proxy statement five out of the Company’s ninecompany’s seven incumbent directors are independent, as defined in the NYSE’s corporate governance standards and our by-laws, namely: Michel P. Desbiens,Randall C. Benson, Suzanne Blanchet, Jennifer C. Dolan, Alain Rhéaume and Michael S. Rousseau. Richard D. Falconer, Jeffrey A. Hearn, Alain Rhéaume, Michael S. Rousseau and David H. Wilkins.

In determining Mr. Hearn’s independence, both the human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee and the full board considered that Mr. Hearnwho ceased to be a director as of May 12, 2020, was engaged to provide consulting services on strategic projects being evaluated by the Company. The human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee and the full board concluded that the limited nature of the services provided and the amounts paid to Mr. Hearn for such services (which did not exceed $10,000also independent, as defined in the aggregate in 2015) were not materialNYSE’s corporate governance standards and did not impair Mr. Hearn’s independence.

our by-laws.

The board has also determined that each member of the audit committee and the human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee satisfies the requirements for independence, including the additional independence standards under NYSE rules for audit committee members and compensation committee members. As part of these determinations, which included considering the relationships described below underRelated Party Transactions, as applicable, business relationships among our directors, and the categories of relationships below, the board determined that none of the independent directors has a direct or indirect material relationship with the Companycompany other than as a director, or any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

Our corporate governance principles reflect the board’s determination that the following categories of relationships alone are not material and will not impair a director’s independence:

 

ownership of less than 5% of the equity of, or being a director of, another company that does business with the Companycompany where the annual sales to, or purchases from, the Companycompany are less than 5% of the annual revenues of either company;

 

ownership of less than 5% of the equity of, or being an executive officer or director of, an unaffiliated company that is indebted to the Companycompany (or to which the Companycompany is indebted), where the total amount of either company’s indebtedness to the other is less than 5% of the total consolidated assets of either company; and

 

serving as an officer, director or trustee of a charitable organization, where the Company’scompany’s charitable contributions to the organization are less than 2% of that organization’s total annual charitable receipts, or $20,000 per year, whichever is less.

The human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee, in consultation with the audit committee when appropriate, is responsible for reviewing and overseeing related party transactions and conflicts of interest situations involving the Company,company, its directors, executive officers, the chief accounting officer, and related parties.

Code of Conduct

We have adopted a written code of business conduct that applies to all hourly and salaried employees, including our president and chief executive officer, chief financial officer and chief accounting officer, and to Companycompany directors. The code of business conduct establishes the fundamental ethical values and standards the Companycompany expects in the work and business activities of its employees, officers and directors.

Among other things, the code of business conduct requires that each employee and officer disclose any actual, potential or apparent conflict of interest in the manner set out in the code.

The Company’scompany’s corporate governance principles describe the policy concerning the disclosure, review and approval of conflicts of interest or related party transactions with respect to directors. The corporate governance principles, together with the code of business conduct, provide guidance to directors in handling unforeseen situations as they arise, and they provide that each director:

 

must avoid every conflict of interest with the Companycompany and must recuse himself or herself from any board decision where a conflict of interest may exist;

 

owes a duty to the Companycompany to advance its legitimate interests when the opportunity to do so arises;

 

must maintain confidentiality of information entrusted to him or her;

 

must comply, and oversee the compliance by employees, officers and other directors, with applicable laws, rules and regulations;

 

must deal fairly, and must oversee fair dealing by employees and officers, with the Company’scompany’s customers, suppliers, competitors and employees;

should promote ethical behavior; and

 

must protect the Company’scompany’s assets and ensure their efficient use.

The code of business conduct is available on our website (www.resolutefp.com/about_us/corporate_governance). The Companycompany will post on its website any waiver or amendment to the code of business conduct.

Board Leadership Structure; Communication with Independent Directors

The Company’scompany’s business is managed under the direction of the board, with the board delegating the management of the Companycompany to the president and chief executive officer, working with other executive officers, in a manner consistent with the Company’scompany’s objectives and in accordance with its by-laws. This delegation of authority is not intended to minimize the board’s supervisory duties, as more fully set forth in our corporate governance principles.

As board chair, Mr. Martin presides over board meetings. Because he is not considered an independent director, pursuant to our by-laws, a majority of the independent board members selected Mr. Rhéaume, an independent director, to serve as the board’s lead director. His responsibilities as such include, among other things, chairing any meeting of the independent directors in executive session.

As indicated in the Company’scompany’s corporate governance principles, it is the Company’scompany’s current intent that the chair not also concurrently hold the position of chief executive officer and, accordingly, the positions are separated. This allows the chief executive officer to focus on managing the Company,company, and the chair, together with the lead director, to lead the board in providing advice to, and independent oversight of, management. We believe that this structure recognizes the time and effort that our chief executive officer is called to devote to his position, and facilitates the independent functioning of the board, thus enhancing the fulfillment of its oversight responsibilities, and setting the tone for the board in fostering ethical and responsible decision-making and sound corporate governance practices.

Stockholders and other interested persons that would like to communicate with the independent directors may send an e-mail to independentdirectors@resolutefp.com or send a written communication to: Resolute Forest Products Inc. Independent Directors, c/o Resolute Forest Products Corporate Secretary, 111 Duke Street,Robert-Bourassa Boulevard, Suite 5000, Montréal, Québec, Canada,Montreal, Quebec, H3C 2M1.2M1, Canada. The Company’scompany’s corporate secretary will forward those communications to the intended recipients and will retain copies for the Company’scompany’s records.

Regardless of the method of communication, no message will be screened or edited before it is delivered to the intended recipient(s), who will determine whether to relay the message to other members of the board.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Management is responsible for assessing and managing risk, subject to oversight by our board. The board executes its oversight responsibility for risk assessment and risk management directly through its committees, as follows:

 

 

Audit committee. The audit committee periodically reviews management’s plans to manage the Company’scompany’s exposure to financial risk, and reports or makes recommendations on significant issues to the board. To the extent deemed appropriate in fulfilling its responsibilities, the audit committee also discusses and considers the Company’scompany’s policies with respect to general risk assessment and risk management, major information technology and cybersecurity risk exposures, and reviews contingent liabilities and risks that could be material to the Company,company, including major legislative and regulatory developments that could materially impact the Company’scompany’s contingent liabilities.

 

Environmental, health and safety committee. The environmental, health and safety committee reviews the Company’scompany’s outstanding and potential liabilities related to environmental, health and safety matters. It also reviews with management all significant environmental incidents or occupational accidents within the Companycompany and any event of material non-compliance. The committee monitors the Company’scompany’s relationships with external environmental, health and safety regulatory authorities, which are critical to our business operations. The committee also periodically reviews the company’s strategies, activities, policies and communications regarding sustainability and other related matters and makes recommendations to the board.

 

 

Finance committee. The finance committee reviews at least annually a report prepared by management on the financial health, from an actuarial perspective, of the benefit plans of the Company’scompany’s subsidiaries, and related funding obligations. At least annually, the finance committee reviews the adequacy of management’s plans and processes to manage the Companycompany and its subsidiaries’ exposure to financial risks and the Companycompany and its subsidiaries’ insurance principles and coverage, including those associated with the use of derivatives, currency and interest rates swaps and other risk management techniques. The finance committee also reviews, as needed, the actual and projected financial situation and capital needs of the Company,company, including as a result of the Company’scompany’s business plan and strategy, cash plan, short-term investment policy, balance sheet, dividend policy, issuance or repurchase of Companycompany stock and capital structure (e.g.(e.g., the respective level of debt and equity, the sources of financing and equity, the Company’scompany’s financial ratios and credit rating policy).

 

 

Human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee. The human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee assists the board in discharging its responsibilities with respect to human resources strategy, policies and programs and matters relating to the use of human resources and also assists the board in fulfilling its responsibilities to ensure that the Companycompany is governed in a manner consistent with its by-laws and in the best interests of its stockholders. The human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee also considers the impact of the Company’scompany’s executive compensation program and the incentives created by the compensation awards on the Company’scompany’s risk profile, and reviews all of the Company’scompany’s compensation policies and procedures, including the incentives that they create and factors that may reduce the likelihood of excessive risk taking, to determine whether they present a significant risk to the Company.company. The board believes that these roles are important in managing the Company’scompany’s reputational risk.

The board does not view risk in isolation. Risks are considered in virtually every business decision, including those related to the Company’scompany’s strategic plan and capital structure.

Director Qualifications, and Nomination Process and Diversity Policy

We believe that each director should possess high personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, an inquiring and independent mind as well as practical wisdom, vision and mature judgment. He or she should also have substantial training and experience at the policy-making level in business, government, or education and/or expertise that is useful to the Companycompany and complementary to the background and experience of other board members, so that an optimum balance of expertise among members on the board can be achieved and maintained. In light of other business and personal commitments, he or she should also be willing and able to devote the required amount of time to diligently fulfill the duties and responsibilities of board membership, and be committed to serve on the board over a period of years to develop knowledge about the Company’scompany’s operations.

With respect to the human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee’s evaluation of nominee candidates, including those recommended by stockholders, the committee has no formal requirement or minimum standard for the evaluation of nominees. Rather, the committee considers each candidate on his or her own merits. But in evaluating candidates, some of the specific areas of expertise and experience that we believe to be important in light of our business are listed below; ideally, these areas should be represented by at least one board member:

 

professional services, such as lawyers, investment bankers and university professors;

 

politics/government relations;

management/operating experience, such as a chief executive officer, chief operating officer or senior manager; and

 

financial/accounting experience, such as a chief financial officer, certified financial analyst or professional accountant or analyst.

The applicable aspects of each director’s experience, qualifications and skills that the board considered in their nomination in light of the foregoing are included in their individual biographies below. It is also desirable that each member of the board has recent experience as a member of the board of at least one other company, preferably a public company.

While When evaluating the performance of the board does not haveand its members, the human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee also considers tenure and board renewal aspects.

In 2020, the board adopted a formal written diversity policy theboth at board level and executive level. The board and the human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee advocate diversity in the broadest sense.sense, including diversity of experience, expertise and personal characteristics, such as the representation of men and women at the board level. Diversity is important because we believe a variety of points of view contribute to a more effective decision-making process. Although not specifiedWhile maintaining the appropriate mix of skills and experience reflecting the strategic needs of the business and the nature of the environment in which the charter,company operates, the human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee shall actively seeksseek out a broad pool of candidates for board positions from diverse ethnic, race, gender and cultural background. The board will strive to maintain a minimum of 25% representation each of men and women. Currently there are two women on the board and with the proposed candidates all being elected at the annual meeting, the board will have a 29% representation of women.

The company also considers diversity of personal characteristics an important element within its executive leadership. Accordingly, diversity, inclusive of the representation of men and women, is a key factor in the company’s talent management strategy, which seeks to identify, mentor and develop current executives and

employees for more senior positions within the organization. As part of its mandate to monitor the talent management strategy, the human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee ensures that policy objectives are applied when implementing the talent management strategy and when identifying and evaluating internal or external candidates for executive leadership positions.

Stockholders who wish to submit director candidates for consideration by our human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee at the 20172022 annual meeting may do so by submitting in writing such candidates’ names, in compliance with the procedures and along with the other information required by our by-laws, to the corporate secretary, Resolute Forest Products Inc., 111 Duke Street,Robert-Bourassa Boulevard, Suite 5000, Montréal, Québec, CanadaMontreal, Quebec, H3C 2M1, Canada no earlier than March 3, 2017,February 20, 2022, and no later than April 2, 2017.March 22, 2022.

Meetings and Committees

The board met 11eight times in 2015.2020. No incumbent director attended fewer than 86%100% of the number of regular and special meetings of the board and no incumbent director attended fewer than 98.7 % of the aggregate number of regular and special meetings of the board and of the committees on which the director sits.

We expect each director to attend all regular board meetings, all meetings of the committee(s) on which the director sits and all annual and special meetings of stockholders. All the incumbent directors standing for reelection attended last year’s annual meeting of stockholders. For detailed attendance information for incumbent directors, please see their individual biographical information below.

The board has adopted a written charter for each of its four standing committees: the audit committee, the human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee, the environmental health and safety committee and the finance committee. Each committee’s charter is available on our website at www.resolutefp.com/about_us/corporate_governance.

Audit Committee

The members of the audit committee are: Jennifer C. Dolan, Suzanne Blanchet, Alain Rhéaume and Michael S. Rousseau (chair). Richard D. Falconer Alain Rhéaume (chair) and Michael S. Rousseau.was also a member of the audit committee until May 12, 2020. The board has determined that each member of the audit committee is “independent” in accordance with the NYSE’s corporate governance standards, our by-laws and rule 10A-3 promulgated pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the “Exchange Act.Exchange Act.” The board has determined that each member qualified as an “audit committee financial expert” in accordance with SEC rules.

The audit committee oversees our financial reporting, internal controls and audit function process on behalf of the board. Its purposes and responsibilities include:

 

Monitoring the integrity of our financial reporting process, systems of internal control and financial statements.

Monitoring the independence and qualifications of our independent registered public accounting firm.

 

Overseeing the audit of the Company’scompany’s financial statements.

 

Monitoring the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm.

 

Monitoring our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements that could have an impact on the Company’scompany’s financial statements.

 

Fostering open communications among the board, management, the independent registered public accounting firm and internal auditors.

Reviewing management’s plans to manage the Company’scompany’s exposure to financial risk and report or make recommendations on significant issues to the board.

 

Overseeing other matters mandated by applicable rules and regulations as well as listing standards of the NYSE.

The audit committee met eight times in 2015.2020.

Environmental, Health and Safety Committee

The members of the environmental, health and safety committee are: Michel P. Desbiens, Jeffrey A. HearnSuzanne Blanchet (chair), Richard D. Falconer,Randall C. Benson, Jennifer C. Dolan and Bradley P. Martin and David H. Wilkins.Martin. The environmental, health and safety committee monitors the policies, management systems and performance of the Company’scompany’s environmental and occupational health and safety matters on behalf of the board.

The primary responsibilities of the environmental, health and safety committee include:

 

Reviewing the adequacy of the environmental, health and safety programs and performance of the Company.company.

 

Reviewing annually the Company’scompany’s environmental, health and safety (i) vision and policies and (ii) strategies and objectives.

 

Reviewing outstanding and potential liabilities for environmental, health and safety matters.

 

Reviewing with management all significant environmental incidents or occupational accidents within the Companycompany and any event of material non-compliance.

 

Monitoring the Company’scompany’s relationships with external environmental, health and safety regulatory authorities and with other stakeholders.

Reviewing the company’s strategies, activities, policies and communications regarding sustainability and other related matters.

The environmental, health and safety committee met four times in 2015.2020.

Finance Committee

The members of the finance committee are: MichelRandall C. Benson (chair), Suzanne Blanchet, Bradley P. Desbiens,Martin, Alain Rhéaume and Michael S. Rousseau. Richard D. Falconer (chair), Bradley P. Martin and Alain Rhéaume.was also a member of the finance committee until May 12, 2020. The primary responsibilities of the finance committee include:

 

Reviewing as needed the adequacy of management’s plans to manage the Company’scompany’s exposure to financial risk and insurance principles and coverage, including those associated with the use of derivatives, currency and interest rate swaps and other risk management techniques.

 

Reviewing as needed the actual and projected financial situation and capital needs of the Company.company.

 

Reviewing at least annually the Company’scompany’s tax situation and tax strategy.

 

Reviewing as needed the Company’scompany’s investor profile and related investor relations and stockholder services of the Company.company.

 

Reviewing potential merger, acquisition, divestiture, joint venture and other similar transactions and capital expenditure projects to be submitted to the board.

 

Reviewing at least once a year a report prepared by management on the financial health, from an actuarial perspective, of the benefit plans of the Company’scompany’s subsidiaries, and related funding obligations.

OurThe finance committee met four times in 2015.2020.

Human Resources and Compensation/Nominating and Governance Committee

The members of the human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee are: Randall C. Benson, Jennifer C. Dolan, Jeffrey A. Hearn,Alain Rhéaume (chair) and Michael S. Rousseau (chair)Rousseau. Richard D. Falconer was also a member of the human resources and David H. Wilkins.compensation/nominating and governance committee until May 12, 2020. The human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee’s primary responsibilities include:

 

 

Human resources and compensation

 

Reviewing from time to time and approving the structure of the Company’scompany’s executive compensation to ensure the structure is appropriate to achieve the Company’scompany’s objectives.

 

Evaluating annually the chief executive officer’s performance and compensation, and participating in such evaluation as it relates to other executive officers of the Company.company.

 

At least annually, working with the chair of the board and the chief executive officer to plan for chief executive officer succession and reviewing the succession planning with the board.

 

Recommending to the board the appropriate structure and amount of compensation for non-employee directors.

 

Periodically evaluating the Company’scompany’s executive incentive plans and approving proposed amendments to executive benefit plans.

 

Reviewing and approving employment, severance and change in control agreements.

 

Considering the impact of the Company’scompany’s executive compensation program and the incentives created by compensation awards on the Company’scompany’s risk profile, and reviewing all of the Company’scompany’s compensation policies and procedures.

 

Recommending to the board nominees to serve as officers of the Company.company.

 

 

Corporate governance

 

Overseeing and monitoring compliance with the Company’scompany’s code of business conduct.

 

Reviewing and overseeing related party transactions and conflicts of interest situations involving the Company,company, its directors, executive officers, the chief accounting officer, and related persons, in consultation with the audit committee as appropriate.

 

Developing and recommending the Company’scompany’s corporate governance principles to the board.

 

Making recommendations to the board regarding stockholder proposals and any other matters relating to corporate governance.

 

 

Board of directors and board committees

 

Annually evaluating the size and composition of the board.

 

Making recommendations to the board regarding any resignation tendered by a director that fails to receive a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election.

Identifying and recommending qualified director candidates to the board and submitting a slate of nominees for election by stockholders at the annual meeting.

 

Considering director candidates proposed by stockholders in accordance with the Company’s company’s by-laws.

 

Ensuring a process by which the board can assess its performance.

 

Assessing the performance of each board committee annually, including a review of board committee charters.

The human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee met fourfive times in 2015.2020.

Director CompensationDIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Director Compensation for 20152020

 

Name

  Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash(1)(2)
  Stock
Awards(3)
  Option
Awards
   Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
   Change in
Pension

Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
  All Other
Compensation
  Total 

Michel P. Desbiens

  $75,000   $75,000(6)  $—     $—     $—    $—    $150,000  

Jennifer C. Dolan

   75,000    75,000(7)   —      —      —     —     150,000  

Richard Falconer

   90,000(4)   75,000(6)   —      —      3,346(8)   —     168,436  

Richard Garneau (5)

   —     —     —      —      —     —     —   

Jeffrey A. Hearn

   90,000(4)   75,000(7)  —      —      —     9,993(9)   174,993  

Bradley P. Martin

   225,000(4)   75,000(6)  —      —      16,715(8)   —     316,715  

Alain Rhéaume

   120,000(4)   75,000(6)   —      —      —     —     195,000  

Michael Rousseau

   90,000(4)   75,000(6)  —      —      —     —     165,000  

David Wilkins

   75,000    75,000(7)   —      —      —     —     150,000  

Name

 Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash(1)(2)
  Stock
Awards
  Option
Awards
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(3)
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(4)
  All Other
Compensation
  Total 

Randall C. Benson

 $86,625(7)  $—    $—    $75,000(8)  $21,687  $—    $183,312 

Suzanne Blanchet

  86,625(7)   —     —     75,000(8)   —     —     161,625 

Jennifer C. Dolan

  72,188   —     —     75,000(9)   —     —     147,188 

Richard D. Falconer(5)

  34,688   —     —     75,000(8)   13,361   —     123,049 

Yves Laflamme(6)

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Bradley P. Martin

  216,563(7)   —     —     75,000(8)   54,217   —     345,780 

Alain Rhéaume

  105,875(7)   —     —     75,000(8)   —     —     180,875 

Michael S. Rousseau

  96,250(7)   —     —     75,000(8)   —     —     171,250 

 

1.

Retainer fees of all directors were payable in cash, except those of Messrs. Benson, Falconer and Martin, who elected to defer $45,000 and $225,000, respectively,all of their cash fees under the Resolute Forest Products Outside Director Deferred Compensation Plan or “director deferred compensation planplan.. The amounts shown reflect a 15% reduction in fees for the second quarter of 2020.

 

2.

The director fees are paid quarterly.

 

3.

These amounts represent cash-settled awards granted to each outside director. On February 16, 2015,11, 2020, each outside director was granted an equity award with an aggregate grant datea fair value of $75,000 each under FASB ASC Topic 718 and covering 4,072 shares of Company common23,734 stock units, subject to the Resolute Forest Products Equity Incentive Plan or equity“equity incentive plan.” The Companycompany determined the number of sharesunits by dividing the award value by the volume weighted average of the highest and lowest prices per share at which the Company’scompany’s common stock was traded on the NYSE on each of the five business days immediately before the February 16, 201511, 2020 grant date, or $18.42.$3.16.

Canadian directors received the award in the form of deferred stock units, or “DSUs,” and U.S. directors received the award in the form of restricted stock units, or “RSUs” (collectively, “2020 cash-settled awards”). The 2020 cash-settled awards vested in 25% tranches on the last day of each calendar quarter of 2020. The 2020 cash-settled awards for all directors active as of December 31, 2020, were fully vested. The value of each director’s 2020 cash-settled award based on the per-share closing trading price on the NYSE of shares of the company’s common stock on the last trading day of the year, December 31, 2020, or $6.54, is shown below in the table under “Equity Award Component.”

 

4.Canadian directors received

These amounts represent “premium stock units” credited to the award inaccounts of Messrs. Benson, Falconer and Martin under the formdirector deferred compensation plan as a result of deferredthe deferral of their 2020 fees under this plan. The amount of the premium stock units or “DSUs,” and U.S. directors received the award in the form of restricted stock units, or “RSUs” (collectively, “2015 equity awards”). For each director, the 2015 equity awards vested in 25% tranchesis based on the last day of each calendar quarter of 2015. As of December 31, 2015, the 2015 equity awards for all directors were fully vested. Each director’s vested equity award had a fair market value of $30,825 on December 31, 2015 (based on the per-share closing trading price on the NYSE of shares of the Company’scompany’s common stock on the last trading day of the year, December 31, 2015,2020, or $7.57).$6.54.

 

4.5.

Mr. Falconer resigned from the board effective May 12, 2020, due to retirement and his RSUs continued to vest through June 30, 2020.

6.

As permitted under SEC rules, all of Mr. Laflamme’s compensation from the company for 2020 is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table because he was a named executive officer in 2020. Mr. Laflamme did not receive any additional compensation for his service on the board.

7.

Mr. Martin serves as chair of the board. However, because Mr. Martin is not an independent director under SEC standards, the board appointed Mr. Rhéaume as lead director and approved an additional retainer for his service in this capacity. The “Fees Earned or Paid in Cash” column reflectreflects the additional fees

Messrs. Martin and Rhéaume received in 20152020 for these roles and additional fees Mr. Rhéaume receives as committee chair. The fees for Ms. Blanchet and Messrs. Falconer, HearnBenson and Rousseau reflect the additional fees for their roles as committee chairs.

 

5.8.As permitted under SEC rules, all of Mr. Garneau’s compensation from the Company for 2015 is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table because he was a named executive officer in 2015.

6.The 2015 equity2020 cash-settled awards to Ms. Blanchet and Messrs. Desbiens,Benson, Falconer, Martin, Rhéaume and Rousseau were in the form of cash-settled DSUs.

7.The 2015 equity awards to Ms. Dolan and Messrs. Hearn and Wilkins were in the form of RSUs.

8.These amounts represent “premium stock units” credited to Messrs. Falconer’s and Martin’s accounts under the director deferred compensation plan (as described below underResolute Forest Products Outside Director Deferred Compensation Plan) as a result of the deferral of their 2015 fees under such plan.

 

9.This amount represents fees for consulting services Mr. Hearn performed on strategic projects, as authorized by

The 2020 cash-settled award to Ms. Dolan was in the board.form of cash-settled RSUs.

Cash Component

Compensation payable to the non-employee directors is based on an annual retainer fee, payable in cash in equal quarterly installments. The annual retainer fee has remained unchanged since 2011 at $75,000. In recognition of their added accountabilities, the board chair, lead director and committee chairs receive additional annual fees, payable in cash in equal quarterly installments. The additional annual fees also remained unchanged since 2011 at $150,000 for the board chair, $25,000 for the audit committee chair and $15,000 for the other committee chairs. The lead director receives an additional annual fee of $20,000. The Companycompany reimburses all directors for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attending board and committee meetings. In response to the company’s capacity reduction for its wood products and paper segments due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the compensation committee recommended, and the independent members of the board approved, a quarterly retainer fee reduction of 15% for the non-employee directors for the second quarter. Effective for the third quarter, the full quarterly retainer fee was reinstated. The directors did not receive any additional fees to make-up for the 15% fee reduction during the second quarter.

Resolute Forest Products Outside Director Deferred Compensation Plan

Non-employee directors hadhave an opportunity to defer all or a portion of their cash fees under the director deferred compensation plan. Fees deferred pursuant to the director deferred compensation plan are credited as DSUs for Canadian directors and as RSUs for U.S. directors. The number of deferred compensation DSUs and RSUs is determined by dividingmultiplying 110% oftimes the amount of fees deferred and dividing this amount by the volume weighted average of the highest and lowest prices per share at which the Company’scompany’s common stock was traded on the NYSE on each of the five business days immediately before the date the fees would otherwise be paid, resultingpaid. This formula results in a 10% incentive (referred to in the director deferred compensation plan as the premium“premium stock unitsunits”).

The following table describes how DSUs and RSUs are vested and paid under the director deferred compensation plan:

 

Key Provisions

 

DSUs under Director Deferred Compensation Plan

  

RSUs under Director Deferred Compensation Plan

Vesting

 

•  Non-premium DSUs and RSUs are always 100% vested

 

•  Premium DSUs and RSUs vest one-third on March 31 of the first three calendar years following the year in which they are credited, but with automatic 100% vesting upon termination of board service for any reason other than cause

Form of

Payment

 Lump sum payment in cash  Installment payments in cash

Timing of

Payment

 

•  All If the director is subject to Code Section 409A, all non-premium DSUs and vested premium DSUs are paid as soon as administratively feasible after a termination of board service unless director is subject to Section 409A of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, the “Code

 

•  If the director is not subject to Code Section 409A, all non-premium DSUs and vested premium DSUs are paid by December 15 of the calendar year following the calendar year of his or her termination of board service, unless the director provides advance written notice specifying an earlier settlement date

  

•  Generally, one-third of all non-premium RSUs and all vested premium RSUs are paid as soon as administratively feasible after each premium RSU vesting date

 

•  All non-premium RSUs and vested premium RSUs are paid as soon as administratively feasible after termination of board service for any reason other than cause before scheduled payment dates

Definition

Equity Award Component

of “Cause”

•     Commission of a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude, or other material act or omission involving dishonesty or fraud

•     Engaging in conduct that would bring or is reasonably likely to bring the Company or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries into public disgrace or disrepute, or that would affect the Company’s or any affiliate’s or subsidiary’s business in any material way

•     Failure to perform duties as reasonably directed by the Company (which, if reasonably curable, is not cured within 10 days after notice thereof is provided to the director)

•     Gross negligence, willful malfeasance or a material act of disloyalty or other breach of fiduciary duty with respect to the Company, its affiliates or subsidiaries (which, if reasonably curable, is not cured within 10 days after notice is provided to the director)

Equity Component

In addition to the cash fee component of the directors’ compensation, to ensure the directors’ interests are aligned with those of the stockholders, we grant an annual equity-based awardsaward to each director. The 2015 annual2020 equity award was granted on February 16, 2015.settles in cash. The Human Resourceshuman resources and Compensation/Nominatingcompensation/nominating and Governance Committeegovernance committee (“compensation committee”) adheres to a policy that sets the annual grant date for director equitythe annual awards (whether granted as a stock-settled award or cash-settled award) as the eighth trading date after the release of fourth quarter earnings. For the 2020 cash-settled award, the grant date was February 11, 2020.

The 20152020 annual equitycash-settled award and its terms are highlighted in the Director Compensation table above and the accompanying footnotes. In addition to the terms noted above, the following table describes how the 20152020 annual equitycash-settled award is vested and settled:

 

Key Provisions

 

DSU Awards

  

RSU Awards

Vesting upon

Termination

of Service

 

•  Upon failure to be re-elected or mandatory retirement,pro ratavesting of unvested DSUs or RSUs based on months of service in 20152020 unless the board determines otherwise

 

•  Upon death or disability, accelerated vesting of the tranche of DSUs or RSUs scheduled to vest at the end of the calendar quarter of the director’s termination date

 

•  Upon termination for cause, forfeiture of all vested and unvested DSUs or RSUs

 

•  Upon any other termination (including resignation), forfeiture of all unvested DSUs or RSUs

Form of

Settlement

 Lump sum payment in Company stockcash  Installment payments in Company stockcash

Timing of

Settlement

 

•  Vested DSUs will be settled upon termination of board service

  

•  Generally, vested RSUs will be settled in one-third increments on March 31 of 2016, 20172021, 2022 and 20182023

 

•  Accelerated settlement upon termination of service for any reason other than cause

Definition

of “Cause”

Cash Amount
 

•  CommissionAmount payable in cash based on the volume weighted average of a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude, or other material act or omission involving dishonesty or fraud

•    Engaging in conduct that would bring or is reasonably likely to bring the Company or anyhighest and lowest prices per share at which the company’s common stock was traded on the NYSE on each of its affiliates or subsidiaries into public disgrace or disrepute, or that would affect the Company’s or any affiliate’s or subsidiary’sfive business in any material way

•    Failure to perform duties as reasonably directed bydays immediately before the Company (which, if reasonably curable, is not cured within 10 days after notice thereof is provided to the director)

•    Gross negligence, willful malfeasance or a material act of disloyalty or other breach of fiduciary duty with respect to the Company, its affiliates or subsidiaries (which, if reasonably curable, is not cured within 10 days after notice is provided to the director)settlement date

Definition of

“Disability”

If the director was an employee, he or she would satisfy the criteria for long-term disability benefits under a Company-sponsored plan

The following table shows the total outstandingannual awards held by the directors at December 31, 2015. The option award represents the award granted to all directors except Ms. Dolan and Messrs. Desbiens and Martin upon the Company’s emergence from creditor protection proceedings. It was a one-time option grant and is not a part of the directors’ annual compensation program. The remaining awards were in the form of DSUs(DSUs for Canadian directors and RSUs for U.S. directors.directors) granted to the directors since their appointment on the board and the market value of each award at December 31, 2020. Each award had an initial grant value of $75,000. All awards are vested. At December 31, 2020, each active director continues to hold all shares settled for awards granted in prior years.The number of units below reflect the number awarded at grant plus dividend equivalents that were issued.

 

   Grant
Date
  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
   Number of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised Options
  Option
Exercise
Price
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have
Vested
  Market
Value of
Shares or Units
That Have
Vested(2)
 

Name

  Exercisable  Unexercisable     

Each Director at 12/31/15, except Ms. Dolan, Mr. Desbiens and Mr. Martin(1)

  01/09/11    9,302    —     $23.05    01/09/2021    —     $—    
  04/08/11    —      —      —      —      2,711    20,522  
  02/27/12    —      —      —      —      4,889    37,010  
  02/18/13    —      —      —      —      5,459    41,325  
  02/11/14       3,872    29,311  
  02/16/15    —      —      —      —      4,072    30,825  

Mr. Martin at 12/31/15

  08/06/12    —      —      —      —      3,290    24,905  
  02/18/13    —      —      —      —      5,459    41,325  
  02/11/14       3,872    29,311  
  02/16/15    —      —      —      —      4,072    30,825  

Ms. Dolan and Mr. Desbiens at 12/31/15

  08/07/13    —      —      —      —      2,835    21,461  
  02/11/14       3,872    29,311  
  02/16/15    —      —      —      —      4,072    30,825  

Name(1)                                                                                      

  Grant
Date
   Number of
Stock Units and
Dividend
Equivalents(2)
   Market Value
at 12/31/20(3)
 

Messrs. Falconer, Rhéaume and Rousseau
at 12/31/20

   04/08/11    3,188   $20,850 
   02/27/12    5,749   $37,598 
   02/18/13    6,419   $41,980 
   02/11/14    4,553   $29,777 
   02/16/15    4,788   $31,314 
   02/15/16    21,199   $138,641 
   02/13/17    19,171   $125,378 
   02/12/18    11,292   $73,850 
   02/12/19    9,352   $61,162 
    02/11/20    23,734   $155,220 

Ms. Blanchet at 12/31/20

   02/12/19    9,352   $61,162 
    02/11/20    23,734   $155,220 

Mr. Martin at 12/31/20

   08/06/12    3,869   $25,303 
   02/18/13    6,419   $41,980 
   02/11/14    4,553   $29,777 
   02/16/15    4,788   $31,314 
   02/15/16    21,199   $138,641 
   02/13/17    19,171   $125,378 
   02/12/18    11,292   $73,850 
   02/12/19    9,352   $61,162 
    02/11/20    23,734   $155,220 

Ms. Dolan at 12/31/20

   08/07/13    2,835   $18,541 
   02/11/14    3,872   $25,323 
   02/16/15    4,072   $26,631 
   02/15/16    19,085   $124,816 
   02/13/17    18,215   $119,126 
   02/12/18    11,292   $73,850 
   02/12/19    9,352   $61,162 
    02/11/20    23,734   $155,220 

Mr. Benson at 12/31/20

   08/14/17    9,564   $62,549 
   02/12/18    11,292   $73,850 
   02/12/19    9,352   $61,162 
   02/11/20    23,734   $155,220 

 

1.

Mr. Garneau’sLaflamme’s equity awards are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table as permitted under SEC rules.

 

2.

Vested awards for the Canadian directors will be settled either in shares of common stock or cash upon termination from board service pursuant to the award agreements. Shares under the vested awards for the U.S. directors are being settled either in shares of common stock or cash pursuant to the award agreements, which provide for one-third of each award to be settled each year, beginning with the year after the award is vested.

3.

The fair market value shown is based on the per-share closing trading price on the NYSE of shares of the Company’scompany’s common stock on December 31, 2015,2020, or $7.57.$6.54.

In addition, on January 9, 2011, and upon the company’s emergence from creditor protection proceedings, Messrs. Falconer, Rhéaume and Rousseau received a one-time option grant. The option award covered 9,302 shares with a $23.05 exercise price. The option was fully exercisable, but expired on January 9, 2021. Option awards are not a part of the directors’ annual compensation program.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We have established stock ownership guidelines for directors to ensure that they are also stockholders, thereby aligning their interests with those of other Companycompany stockholders. Under the guidelines, each director must own shares or share equivalents of Companycompany stock equal to three times the annual cash retainer fee ($225,000 in total as of December 31, 2015)2020). For purposes of the guidelines, all shares directly owned and deferred stock units (whether DSUs or RSUs, and whether vested or unvested)unvested, and cash or stock-settled) are included in the calculation. Unexercised stock options are not included in the calculation. Until the stock ownership requirement is met, the guidelines require directors to hold all shares received upon settlement of stock units (excluding shares withheld for taxes)sold to pay taxes associated with settled shares) and a number of shares equal to 50% of any gain realized upon option exercise. In 2017, the compensation committee updated the guidelines to require a director who does not meet the guidelines to purchase shares or share equivalents with the net proceeds of any cash-settled awards. To determine whether a director has met the stock ownership requirement, the shares or share equivalents held by each director will beare calculated on the basis of the higher of the (i) price at time of settlement and (ii) fair market value of the common stock at the time of measurement, while share equivalents are calculated on the basis of the higher of the (i) price at time of grant and (ii) fair market value of the common stock at the time of measurement.

As of December 31, 2015, Messrs. Falconer and Martin2020, all members of the board of directors, except Ms. Blanchet, own sufficient shares or share equivalents to meet the stock ownership requirement, based on the December 31, 2020 per-share closing price of $7.57.$6.54. Ms. Dolan and Mr. Desbiens continueBlanchet continues to hold theirher shares or share equivalents pursuant to the guidelines, but did not meet the stock ownership requirement as of December 31, 20152020, given theirher shorter tenure on the board and the change in stock price. The

board.

remaining directors, Messrs. Hearn, Rhéaume, Rousseau and Wilkins, met the stock ownership requirement as of December 31, 2014 but, despite continuing to hold their shares, did not meet the stock ownership requirements as of December  31, 2015 given the decrease in the price of Company stock in 2015.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company’scompany’s corporate governance principles provide the framework under which we consider “related party transactions,” which are generally relationships and transactions involving more than $120,000 in any fiscal year in which the Companycompany is a participant and in which any director, executive officer, holder of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock or any of their immediate family members has a direct or indirect material interest. The human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee, in consultation with the audit committee when appropriate, is responsible for implementing and overseeing policies and procedures for related party transactions and conflict of interest situations, and also reviews all related party transactions or potential conflict of interest situations involving the Company,company, its directors, executive officers, the chief accounting officer and related persons. The board may also create special independent committees from time to time to review certain transactions, including related party transactions. The corporate governance principles provide that directors may not enter into a transaction with the Companycompany without first disclosing the transaction and obtaining advance approval by the board and the human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee, and the director must recuse himself or herself from board consideration and decision on any such transaction.

According to a Schedule 13G filing made with the SEC, BlackRock, Inc. ceased to be a holder of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock as of January 31, 2015. Under a previously established business relationship, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited, a subsidiary of BlackRock, Inc., provided investment management services for the benefit of our pension plans. In 2015, we paid BlackRock approximately $281,857 (converted from Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars based on the average exchange rate for 2015, or $0.7291) in fees for providing such investment management services. The engagement of BlackRock has been on terms no more favorable to it than terms that would be available to unaffiliated third parties under similar circumstances.

On June 8, 2015, Resolute Forest Products Inc. acquired 2,749,127 shares of its common stock in a single open market block transaction under its existing share repurchase program. The total purchase price was approximately $31.4 million. According to a Form 4 filed on June 9, 2015, the seller was Steelhead Navigator Master L.P. and, prior to such transaction, beneficially held 10% or more of the shares of common stock of the Company then outstanding.

On September 16, 2015, Resolute Forest Products Inc. acquired 2,000,000 shares of its common stock in a single open market block transaction under its existing share repurchase program. The total purchase price was $18.7 million. According to a Schedule 13G/A filed on September 16, 2015, the seller was Steelhead Navigator Master L.P., a beneficial holder of approximately 7.7% of our shares of common stock then outstanding after giving effect to the transaction.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis

Executive Summary

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis, or CD“CD&A,,” summarizes our executive compensation philosophy and programs, the decisions made under those programs and any changes made to reflect our business objectives. While the executive compensation program is generally applicable to the president and chief executive officer and allthe senior vice presidents,management, this CD&A focuses on the compensation of our “named executive officers” for 2015:2020:

 

Richard Garneau,Yves Laflamme, president and chief executive officer

 

Jo-Ann Longworth,Remi G. Lalonde, senior vice president and chief financial officer

 

Yves Laflamme, senior vice president, wood products, procurement and information technology

André Piché, senior vice president, tissue group (formerly,John Lafave, senior vice president, pulp and paper operations)sales and marketing

 

Richard Tremblay, senior vice president, pulp and paper group (formerly,operations

Jacques Vachon, senior vice president, pulpcorporate affairs and paper operations)chief legal officer

Messrs. PichéMr. Laflamme stepped down and Tremblay joinedretired from the Company’sposition of president and chief executive teamofficer effective as of 11:59 PM on February 5, 2014, each as senior vice president, pulp28, 2021. On March 1, 2021, Mr. Lalonde was appointed to this position. These events were disclosed in a Form 8-K filed on November 10, 2020. Mr. Lalonde and paper operationsthe company finalized the terms of his employment and shared oversight ofchange in control agreements after the Company’s pulpcompany’s Form 10-K was filed on March 1, 2021. In accordance with SEC rules, this CD&A and paper operations until June 1, 2015, reporting to Mr. Garneau. In connection with the Company’s announcement on June 1, 2015 to enter the North American consumer tissue market, the Company made some changes to the executive team. The board of directors appointed Mr. Piché as senior vice president for the tissue group giving him the responsibility to lead the Company’s new strategic business while continuing to oversee three pulp and paper mills. The board of directors appointed Mr. Tremblay as senior vice president for the pulp and paper group and significantly expanded his responsibilities and team. They both continue to report to Mr. Garneau.

The human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee (referred to as the compensation committee in this Executive Compensation section) maintained the executive compensation program for 2015 as highlightedinformation provided in the “Tabular Disclosure of Executive Compensation” following tablethe CD&A describe the compensation in effect for their respective positions in 2020. However, because Mr. Laflamme stepped down and discussedretired in greater detail2021 and the announcement was made in this CD&A.2020, the information provided under “Severance and Change in Control Arrangements” describes the actual payments made upon his termination.

Total Direct Compensation

Indirect
Compensation

Program

Base Salary

Annual Incentive
Compensation

Long-term Incentive
Compensation

DC Make-Up
Program

Perquisites and
General Benefits

Purpose

•   Attracts and retains executives with an assured level of cash

•   Reviewed annually and adjusted for increased accountabilities and performance

•   Rewards attainment of specific, measurable and bottom-line oriented company performance measures

•   Set at a percentage of base salary with threshold, target and maximum payout opportunities

•   Rewards demonstrated individual effectiveness and remarkable initiatives namely behaviors that enhance overall corporate performance

•   Motivates and retains executives to achieve long-range goals

•   Aligns executives with shareholder interests

•   Award values based on a target percentage of salary

•   50%/50% mix between RSUs and PSUs

•   RSUs vest ratably over 4 years

•   PSUs payable upon attainment of performance measures and employment on vesting date

•   Provides, on a current basis, an amount in cash, equal to the company contributions in excess of statutory limits under the tax-qualified defined contribution plans

•   For Canadian executives, also provides an amount equal to the employer contribution for the STIP, which is not pensionable pursuant to the Canadian registered tax-qualified defined contribution plans

•   Absence of deferral feature and ability to accumulate retirement income

•   Fixed perquisite allowance to give executives flexibility in selecting perquisites that suit their individual situations

•   Allowance caps the cost of perquisites

•   Tax-equalization program for non-Canadian executives

•   Offers competitive benefits that include benefits offered to all full-time employees

PerformancePeriod-1 Year3 Years (PSUs)--
LOGOLOGO

Payout Moderately

at Risk

Payout Highly

at Risk

ObjectivesOverview of Compensation Program

Our executive compensation program is designed to meet the following objectives:

 

Attract and retain team members with superior management ability, insight and judgment who will pursue the re-positioningrepositioning of the Companycompany for long-term growth, with a focus on operational excellence and the creation of a sustainable and diversified portfolio of products;

 

Motivate and reward the president and chiefnamed executive officer and all senior vice presidentsofficers for their contributions to the Company’scompany’s growth and profitability on a short- and long-term basis by linking a significant portion of the compensation package to the achievement of specific financial measures and other Companycompany goals and objectives;

 

Encourage superior individual performance by recognizing individual performance in the short-term incentive plan and rewarding, through limited discretionary cash awards, demonstrated effectiveness and remarkable initiatives, namely behaviors that enhance overall corporate performance; and

 

Ensure a strong alignment between executivesnamed executive officers and all stockholder interests.

To further these objectives, the following chart shows the primary compensation elements, which are further detailed under “Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program.”

LOGO

In developing the executive compensation program, the compensation committee incorporates best practices, including the following:

Pay-for-performance philosophy

Use of an independent compensation consultant

Rigorous leadership assessments

Regular comparator group reviews for compensation benchmarking purposes

Target compensation in line with median level for comparator group

Formula to cap annual incentive compensation paid to the named executive officers and other senior vice-presidents

LTIP design with multiple, long-term and both absolute and relative measures, including total shareholder return
Stock ownership guidelines

A significant portion of the named executive officers’ direct compensation at risk

Double-trigger change in control provision for named executive officers

Recoupment policy in place

Annual say-on-pay vote by shareholders regarding executive compensation

Anti-hedging and anti-pledging policy in place

Executive Compensation Process

Role of the Compensation Committee

The compensation committee independently assesses the performance goals and objectives of the president and chief executive officer and makes recommendations to the board as to the amounts and individual elements of his total compensation. The independent directors of the board ultimately approve the final compensation package for the president and chief executive officer. For the senior vice presidents,other named executive officers, the compensation committee evaluates and approves all elements of total compensation. The compensation committee exercises discretion as needed for a given executive’s compensation.

Since 2014, the company implemented and uses an integrated leadership system designed to increase organizational capabilities. The leadership system is designed to:

Optimize the organization’s structure;

Clarify each employee’s role and accountabilities;

Provide a robust approach to evaluating employees’ demonstrated effectiveness and long-term potential;

Improve leadership practices to enhance each employee’s opportunity to drive success individually and, ultimately, for the company;

Better link compensation to individual performance; and

Improve the succession-planning process.

By focusing on providing the right tools for individual success, the company strives to provide its employees with the means to reach their full potential and, therefore, enhance shareholder value, product quality for our clients, and the health and safety of our employees.

As part of this system, each year, the named executive officers reporting to the president and chief executive officer are appraised on three elements: mastery of their basic roles, remarkable initiatives and behaviors that can have an adverse effect on their own effectiveness or on the team. The appraisal reviews also identify areas for improvement. These reviews influence the adjustments made to the compensation amounts of these named executive officers.

Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant

Consistent with its authority under its charter, the compensation committee selects and retains its own independent advisors to provide guidance on the competitiveness and appropriateness of the compensation programs for the president and chiefnamed executive officer and all senior vice presidents.officers. For 2015,2020, the compensation committee retained Hugessen Consulting to provide this advice. In 2015,2020, Hugessen Consulting’s aggregate fees were $16,202$19,688 (converted from Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars based on the average exchange rate for 2015,2020, or $0.7816)$0.7462).

As more fully described below, Hugessen Consulting assists the compensation committee in benchmarking certain elements of the executive compensation program against the Company’scompany’s comparator groups (described below) and advises on the risk elements of the program. Hugessen also provides management advice on these matters, as directed by the chair of the compensation committee. While internal and external information and advice have been used in the ongoing assessment of the executive compensation programs, the compensation committee and the independent members of the board retained the full responsibility for all decisions related to the Company’scompany’s compensation programs and plans as well as their implementation.

To this end,Role of Management

The compensation committee and the president and chief executive officer meet to discuss his performance against the objectives established for him in the beginning of the year. The compensation committee reviews his performance and shares its evaluation with the president and chief executive officer.

The president and chief executive officer provides the compensation committee with his feedback on the performance of the other named executive officers. While the compensation committee considers the president and chief executive officer feedback and any recommendations, the compensation committee makes the final determinations of the compensation decisions for the named executive officers.

Timing of Compensation Decisions

The compensation committee evaluates total direct compensation (comprising of base salary and short-term and long-term incentives) against the median level of the Company’scompany’s comparator groups. It makes its compensation decisions on various elements at different times in the year:

 

February 2015January 2020 

       Assessed Mr. Garneau’s performance for 2014

•       

Recommended for approval and the independent members of the board of directors approved, the 2014 STIP2019 short-term incentive plan (“STIP”) payout, discretionary awards for all members of the executive team, and the terms of the 20152020 STIP

and payout of the 2016 performance stock unit award

February 2020Reviewed the main elements of the executive compensation program, including perquisites, to assess any changes to the program

Reviewed named executive officers’ compliance with stock ownership guidelines
May 20152020 

       Reviewed and approved recommendations to the board of directors of executive team changes in response to the Company’s strategic decision to enter the tissue business

•       Approved recommendations to the board of directors of related base salary adjustments for the reconstituted executive team

June 2015  

•       Recommended for approval and the independent members of the board of directors approved changesbase salary reductions for the second quarter in response to negative COVID-19 impacts on the executive teamcompany.

Recommended for approval and certainthe independent members of the board approved base salary adjustments for the president and chiefcertain named executive officer and all senior vice presidents

officers effective for August 1, 2020
October 20152020 

Recommended for approval and the independent members of the board approved the annual equity grant for management

named executive officers

       Assessed all senior vice presidents’ performance

•       Approved a relocation package for Mr. Tremblay following

Reviewed the Company’s request for Mr. Tremblay to relocate closer toassessment, made by the Company’s Montreal headquarters

president and chief executive officer, of the performance of the other named executive officers
December 20152020 

•       Assessed Mr. Garneau’s performance for 2015

•       Reviewed and discussed succession planning for Mr. Garneau and all senior vice presidents

•       Conducted��

Evaluated the compensation risk assessment

February 20162021 

Recommended for approval and the independent members of the board of directors approved the 20152020 STIP payout, and the terms of the 20162021 STIP

•       At management’s recommendation, discussed and decided not to approve discretionary awards topayout of the executive team

2017 performance stock unit award

2015 2020 Say-on-Pay Vote

Stockholders approved our executive compensation with over 99%91.67% of the votes cast in favor of the non-binding resolution approving executive compensation, or the “say-on-pay”“say-on-pay” vote, at the 20152020 annual meeting of stockholders.

Setting Compensation Levels—Levels — Benchmarking Data

Our executive compensation structure adheres to a pay-for-performance framework with a mix of cash and non-cash elements. There is no formal policy for allocating a certain percentage of pay between cash and non-cash or short-term or long-term pay. The compensation committee favors a mix that is more weighted to variable pay through a short-term cash incentiveSTIP and a long-term, equity incentive,LTIP, which puts a significant portion of compensation at-risk.at risk. The following shows the intended mix for the three main elements of pay since 2011. pay.

President and Chief Executive OfficerAll Other Named Executives
LOGOLOGO

The weighted mix, as shown below,above, is based on the following assumptions: (i) base salary is the salary in effect at December 31, 2015;2020; (ii) the 2015a 2020 STIP at target payout of 100% of base salary; (iii) the value of the annual equity grants (described below) is based on 125% of base salary (225% for the president and chief executive officer)officer (including Mr. Lalonde in anticipation of his March 1, 2021, appointment)); and (iv) parityassuming a fixed exchange rate between the Canadian and U.S. dollars.dollars throughout the year.

   Total Direct Compensation 

Level

  Base Salary  Short-Term
Incentive
(at Target Payout)
  Long-
Term
Incentive
 

President and chief executive officer

   23.5%  23.5  53.0%

All other named executive officers

   31.0%  31.0%  38.0%

The compensation committee annuallyregularly assesses the competitiveness of aggregate total direct compensation (base salary, target short-term incentive and long-term incentives) and each element individually for the president and chiefnamed executive officer and all senior vice presidents.officers. To make this assessment, the compensation committee uses market data based on two comparator groups. In 2014, the compensation committee worked with Hugessen to review the comparator groups and provide market data for benchmarking aggregate total direct compensation and each individual element. The compensation committee historically updated the market data every year, but beginning in 2015, the compensation committee will update the information every two years. As a result, for 2015, in consultation with Hugessen, the compensation committee used the 2014 market data, adjusted by 3%. The compensation committee will reassess the comparator groups and update the market data in 2016.

For reference in 2014, the primary comparator group consisted of 10 industry peers (“industry comparator group”). The second comparator group consisted of a blend of 14 Canadian companies and 38 U.S. companies that were part of Willis Towers Watson’s databank and selected based on industry (the forest and paper products industry) and revenues in certain commodity and other industrial industries (“blended comparator group”). Three companies appeared in both the Canadian and U.S. company comparator groups. The 38 U.S. companies in the blended comparator group also included four of thegroups: an industry comparator group companies.

The industryand a blended comparator group for 2014 was comprised of the following eight U.S. companies and two Canadian companies in the pulp and paper, wood products and packaging sectors:group.

 

Industry Comparator Group

Blended Comparator Group

12 industry peers (3 Canadian companies and 9 U.S. companies)1:

48 companies representing a blend of 15 Canadian companies and 33 U.S. companies,2 based on Willis Towers Watson’s databank, selected based on the forest and paper products industry and revenues in certain commodity and other industrial industries

Bemis Company Inc.

Canfor Pulp Products, Inc.

Cascades Inc.

Clearwater Paper Corporation

Domtar Corporation

Graphic Packaging Holding Company

  

KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation

Louisiana-Pacific Corporation

Rock-Tenn Company
Cascades Inc.MeadWestvaco Corp.Sonoco Products Company
Domtar Corporation

Packaging Corporation of America

Weyerhaeuser

P. H. Glatfelter Company

Graphic Packaging Holding

Sonoco Products Company

Western Forest Products Inc.

  

1.

The comparator group was initially developed by focusing on publicly traded companies with headquarters, operations and sales in Canada and the U.S. that are in the paper packaging, paper or forest products industry. To further narrow the industry comparator group, the company identified the companies with revenue and a total enterprise value between 1/3 to three times that of the company’s revenue and total enterprise value. Finally, the group was refined to its final 12 companies based on peer size with a focus on paper products and packaging companies that have a majority of U.S.-based sales and substantial sales of coated papers, wood products and pulp products. While revenue size is a primary criteria for narrowing the industry comparator group and Western Forest Products Inc. is outside of the revenue criteria, its focus on specialty paper and as lumber producer located in Canada made it an appropriate industry peer.

2.

In the blended comparator group, only one company appeared in both the Canadian and U.S. company groups. The 25 U.S. companies and 15 Canadian companies in the blended comparator group also included nine of the industry comparator group companies.

The compensation committee updates the information regularly, with the last update in 2018. In consultation with Hugessen, because the compensation committee reassessed the comparator groups and market data in 2018, the compensation committee used the 2018 comparator group market data, as adjusted for 2019. The adjusted 2019 was increased by 1.75% when making its compensation assessments in 2020.

While total direct compensation for each named executive officer was compared against both comparator groups each time a comparable position existed in both groups, the compensation committee assessed compensation adjustments against the industrya given comparator group for the following positions: president and chiefeach named executive officer; senior vice president, pulp and paper group; and senior vice president, wood products, procurement and information technology. The industry comparator group was appropriate for these positions because the positions require specific knowledge of the forest products industry to implement the Company’s strategic plans. Whenofficer. In addition, when benchmarking to the industry comparator group, the position for the president and chief executive officer was matched with the chief executive officer at the comparator companies. The senior vice president, pulp and paper group and senior vice president, wood products, procurement and information technology were matched with the next two highest paid named executive officers (after the chief executive officer and chief financial officer) among the comparator companies as well as on position.

The blended comparator group was used for the senior vice president and chief financial officer because this position performs corporate functions and has a skill set that is transferable across industries. As a result, the blended comparator group was appropriate for this position. When benchmarking to the blendedeither comparator group, the comparison was made based on position.

In addition,position, on a currency neutral basis, and against the blended comparator group was usedmedian for the senior vice president, tissue group, because a comparable position was not available in the industryrespective comparator group.

The following chart shows the resulting comparisons against the respective comparator group, using salary levels in effect beforeafter the June 2015August 2020 base salary adjustments described further below underBase Salary.

 

Level

  Comparator
Group
 Base
Salary
  Short-TermShort-
Term
Incentive

(at Target
Payout)
  Target
Total Cash
  Equity
Award
Value
  Total Direct
Compensation

President and chief executive officer

  Industry1 Below
Median
  Below
Median
  Below
Median
  Below
Median
  Below
Median

Senior vice president and chief financial officer

  BlendedBelow
Median
Above
Median
Above
Median
Below
Median
Below
Median

Senior vice president, wood products, procurement and information technology

Industry2 Below
Median
  Above
Median
  Below
Median
  Below
Median
  Below
Median

Senior vice president, pulp and paper sales and marketing

Blended2In Line
Median
Above
Median
Above
Median
Above
Median
Above
Median

Senior vice president, pulp and paper operations

  Industry1 Below
Median
Above
Median
Above
Median
Below
Median
Above
Median

Senior vice president, corporate affairs and chief legal officer

Blended2Below
Median
Above
Median
  Above
Median
  Below
Median
  Below
Median

1.Below
Median

SeniorThe industry comparator group was appropriate for these positions because the positions require specific knowledge of the forest products industry to implement the company’s strategic plans. The position for the president and chief executive officer was matched with the chief executive officer at the comparator companies. The positions of senior vice president, pulp and paper operations was matched with the business unit group head among the comparator companies.

IndustryBelow
Median
Above
Median
Below
Median
Below
Median
Below
Median

2.

The blended comparator group was appropriate for these positions because each of these positions perform corporate functions and have a skill set that is transferable across industries.

Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program

The following highlights the elements of the Company’scompany’s executive compensation program and the basis for the elements:elements.

Base salary

We provide senior managementnamed executive officers with a level of assured cash compensation in the form of base salary. The compensation committee considers future adjustments in base salary as a result of changes in accountabilities and performance, including progression in mastery of the defined roles, or if other circumstances warrant a change in base salary. When considering base salary adjustments, the compensation committee takes into account each named executive officer’sthe demonstrated effectiveness appraisal rating for performingof the expected duties of their defined roles. Among other things, the appraisal reviews and assesses each named executive officer’s masteryofficers reporting to the president and chief executive officer.

In response to the company’s capacity reduction for its wood products and paper segments due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the compensation committee recommended, and the independent members of his or her roles and identifies areasthe board approved, base salary reductions ranging from 5% to 15% for improvement.the named executive officers effective from April 1, 2020 through June 30, 2020. Effective July 1, 2020, the base salary levels that were in effect before April 1, 2020 were reinstated. The named executive officers did not receive any additional base salary to make-up for the base salary reductions that were in effect during the second quarter.

When assessing the annual adjustments, the compensation committee also considers the base salary ranges for ourthe comparator groups to assess each officer’s proximity to the median for the comparator groups. As noted above, when determining the 2015 base salary adjustments, the compensation committee reviewed the 2014 market data, adjusted by 3%. The benchmarking data showed that the base salary levels continued to be below the median level, based on the respective comparator group, for all named executive officers.

Following the compensation committee’s review of the benchmarking data and itsthe performance assessment for all named executive officers, the compensation committee recommended, and the independent members of the board approved, effective JuneAugust 1, 2015,2020, base salary adjustments for the named executive teamofficers as follows: a 10%1.75% base salary increase for Messrs. Laflamme and Vachon, a 1.50% base salary increase for Messrs. Lafave and Tremblay and a 11.89% base salary increase for Mr. Garneau, 4%Lalonde. When Mr. Lalonde was appointed senior vice president and chief financial officer in 2018, his base salary increase for Ms. Longworth, and 5%was established at a level materially lower than the peer group benchmark. While a further adjustment was made in 2019, Mr. Lalonde’s base salary increase forremained materially lower than the peer group. The 2020 salary adjustment was intended to narrow the gap between Mr. Laflamme. Messrs. Piché and Tremblay receivedLalonde’s base salary increases of 9.2% and 17.6%, respectively, primarily for recognition of their increased responsibilities. Specifically, Mr. Piché’s base salary increase recognized his new role in leading the tissue group, the Company’s new strategic business, and his continued oversight of three pulp and paper mills, while Mr. Tremblay’s base salary increase recognized that his responsibilities were significantly expanded to include oversight of the pulp and paper business unit (namely, with the exception of the pulp and paper mills under Mr. Piché’s direction, the remaining pulp and paper mills as well as pulp and paper sales and marketing). In addition, Mr. Tremblay’s responsibilities include a range of operational support functions such as operational excellence, engineering, energy, production planning, logistics, and customer service for the pulp and paper operations.

Because the executive team resides in Canada and the U.S.,benchmark.

The compensation committee established a currency policy in 2014 the independent members of the board of directors approved a new currency policy to address currency fluctuations that can impact parity among its named executive team. It also allows for smoother benchmarking to comparator companies that are paid in U.S. dollars. Specifically, baseofficers. Base salary is established assuming parity in the Canadian and U.S. dollars, with a portion paid in Canadian dollars and a portion paid in U.S. dollars based on the geographic location of the Company’scompany’s pulp, paper and papertissue production capacity as of the prior December 31. As a result, for 2015, 52%2020, 68.9% of an executive’s salary was paid in Canadian dollars and 31.1% in U.S. dollars. Except for Mr. Laflamme who is paid in U.S. dollars, and 48% in Canadian dollars. Thethe numbers shown in the Summary Compensation Table have been converted to U.S. dollars at exchange rates disclosed in the footnotes to the table. For 2016,2021, the portion of base salary paid in Canadian dollars versus U.S. dollars versus Canadian dollars changed slightly to 53%will be 63.5% and 47%36.5%, respectively, based on the geographic mix of the Company’scompany’s pulp, paper and papertissue production capacity as of December 31, 2015.2020.

20152020 STIP

The annual short-term incentive plan awards allrewards the eligible named executive officers for the achievement of the following performance measures that reflect the Company’scompany’s business strategy and factors driving shareholder value:

 

Generating targeted income from operations;

 

Controlling sales and general administration costs, or “SG&A costs”;

Controlling selling, general and administration costs, or “SG&A costs;”

 

Improving safety performance; and

 

Improving environmental performance.

As in past years, the 2015

The 2020 STIP did not reward individual performance and instead remainedprimarily focused on rewarding corporate performance. The 2015 STIP mirrored the 2014 STIP in design. A key feature of the 2015 STIP balanced stockholder return with rewarding individuals for achieving our business objectives. Specifically,objectives while balancing stockholder return.

To determine the 2015full STIP contained an overall limitpayout, two amounts are determined – one amount is attributable to achievement of company performance goals and a second amount is attributable to individual performance. The two amounts are added together for a final STIP payout amount.

To determine the amount attributable to achievement for the company performance goals, the eligible named executive officer’s STIP compensation target is first multiplied by the actual percentage payout for the company performance metrics. This amount is further multiplied by 85%.

To determine the amount, if any, attributable to individual performance, the eligible named executive officer’s STIP compensation target is multiplied by the actual percentage payout for the company performance metrics and by a percentage up to 30% reflecting the executive’s individual payout factor. The individual payout factor is qualitative and is based on the executive’s achievement of goals, exceptional personal or team contribution or results, level of demonstrated effectiveness in the role and remarkable initiatives, subject to the individual performance STIP pool. For the eligible named executive officers and other senior vice presidents, the individual performance STIP pool is the sum of all eligible executives’ base salary, multiplied by the actual achievement of the company performance metrics, further multiplied by 15%.

For 2020, the total amount that could be paidpayable to allthe eligible named executive officers and the other senior vice presidents, as well to certain other eligible employees as a short-termfor the portion of their incentive attributable to the achievement of business objectives, is further limited to 5% of free cash incentive under the planflow. The limit applied even if performance was met. This limit remained set at 7% oflevels were achieved. For this purpose, free cash flow which is defined as net cash provided by operating activities, less asset maintenance safety and environmental capital expenditures, adjusted for cash reorganizationspecial items.

Unless the compensation committee determines otherwise, named executive officers remain eligible for prorated awards if they retire during the year or are terminated other than for cause after July 1, 2020. Named executive officers who voluntarily resign or are terminated for cause before payment is made will not be eligible. The company may adjust financial and restructuring costs, additional pension contributions toward past servicecost metrics, and may adjust any and all awards in its discretion. Awards are discretionary and subject to modification until they are made, including increases, decreases, cancellations, deferrals and other special items.

conditions, even if performance levels have been met. For the president and chief executive officer and all senior vice presidents, including alleligible named executive officers, payout levels were established as a percentage of base salary (as in effect on December 31, 2015)2020). No officer or individual was guaranteed a minimum payout under the 20152020 STIP. The 20152020 STIP also provided authority to the compensation committee to adjust or cancel awards under the 20152020 STIP at its discretion.

 

2015 STIP Payout Levels

Threshold

TargetMaximum
50% of base salary at 12/31/15100% of base salary at 12/31/15150% of base salary at 12/31/15

2020 STIP Payout Levels

(Percentage of Base Salary at 12/31/20)

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

42.5% 100% 172.5%

In establishing the payout percentages, the compensation committee used benchmarking data from its comparator groups. The payout percentages have remained the same since the 2011 STIP. In general, the incentive target threshold of 100% is above the median for our comparator groups, but, combined with the 5% of free cash flow limit on STIP payments described above plus lower base salary levels in its comparator groups, reflects the compensation committee’s adherence to conditioning a significant portion of pay on Companycompany performance. The 42.5% threshold payout level assumes a percentage payout for the company performance metrics of 50% multiplied by 85% attributable to achievement of business objectives and no amount attributable to individual performance. The 172.5% maximum payout level assumes a percentage payout for the company performance metrics of 150% multiplied by 115%, 85% being attributable to achievement of business objectives and 30% being attributable to individual performance.

The table below sets forth the performance measures approved by the compensation committee for the 20152020 STIP that apply to the eligible named executive officers, the associated weight given to each measure and the business objective to which it relates.

 

Performance Measure

 WeightWeighting  

Business Objective/Core Value

Income from operations

  5055 Maximizing profitability

SG&A cost control

  2520 Maximizing profitability

Safety Frequency Rate (15%) and Severity Rate (5%) of Incidents

  20 Continuous improvement of safety performance

Environmental incidentsIncidents

  5 Continuous improvement of environmental performance

AllThe eligible named executive officers earned a 2015 STIP2020 award at 58.25%139% of their annual base salary based on weighted company performance measures. As a result of the overall limit of 7%5% of free cash flow limit on the 2015STIP payout to certain eligible employees, the respective 2020 STIP payouts based on company performance metrics were reduced to 47.82%as shown in the table below. The STIP amounts set forth in the Summary Compensation Table reflect the full value of each eligible named executive officer’s annual base salary.STIP award, including the amount attributed for individual performance.

 

Performance Measure

 

Target

Performance

 Actual
Performance
 Actual Payout
Percentage by
Performance
Measure
 Adjusted Payout
Percentage by
Performance
Measure
 Weight Weighted  Payout
Percentage

Before Overall
Cap of Free
Cash Flow (1)
 Weighted Payout
Percentage After
Overall Cap
of Free
Cash Flow (1)
  

Threshold
Performance

 Target
Performance
 Maximum
Performance
 Actual
Performance
 Actual
Payout
Percentage by

Performance
Measure
 Weight Weighted
Payout
Percentage
Before Overall

Cap of Free
Cash Flow(1)
 Weighted
Payout
Percentage

After
Overall
Cap of
Free Cash
Flow(1)
 

Income from operations

 $197 million 78 million  0%            —    50%    0%    0%   $105.3M $131.6M  $157.9M  $179.2M  150%  55%  83%  75% 

SG&A cost control

 $141 million 142.7 million  83%        25%    20.75%    17.03%   $129.0M $125.0M  $122.0M  $110.6M  150%  20%  30%  27% 

Safety – Frequency Rate(2)

 .95 .66  150%        15%    22.5%    18.47%  

Safety – Severity Rate(3)

 27 23  150%        5%    7.5%    6.16%  

Safety — Frequency Rate(2)

 0.70 0.60  £.50  0.62  93%  15%  14%  13% 

Safety — Severity Rate(3)

 20 17  £15  16.8  103%  5%  5%  5% 

Environmental Incidents(4)

 8% 54%  150%     5%    7.5%    6.16%   20 18  £15  13  147%  5%  7%  7% 
 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

All measures

                58.25%    47.82%        100%   

 

1.

Expressed as a percentage of annual base salary.

 

2.

The frequency of safety incidents is the OSHA incident rate measured by the number of recordable incidents (lost time plus temporary assignments or restricted work plus medical treatments), multiplied by 200,000 and divided by the total number of hours worked. The payout is the weighted average of the operations’ results.

 

3.

The severity of safety incidents is measured by the number of days lost due to lost time incidents and incidents resulting in temporary assignments or restricted work, multiplied by 200,000 and divided by the total number of hours worked. The payout is the weighted average of the operations’ results.

 

4.

Environmental incidents isare measured by a year-over-year improvement for reducing the number of Class 1 & 2 environmental incidents. Class 1 environmental incidents as defined by ourare high severity incidents with risk of significant adverse environmental policy.impact, contamination, liability, damage to the company’s reputation and/or legal action and fines. Class 2 environmental incidents are reportable incidents, non-administrative infractions, regulatory audit findings and conditions that have a moderate risk of potential adverse impact, contamination, liability or damage to the company’s reputation. The payout is the weighted average of the operations’ results.

Since 2013, Mr. Garneau has accepted payment of his STIP awards. However, in his initial years of serving as president and chief executive officer, he declined payment of an aggregate $1,202,712, which representedOn February 3, 2021, the amount he earned for his 2011 and 2012 STIPs.

The compensation committee designed the 2015 STIP to reward corporate performance only and decided not to have any portionindependent members of the 2015board approved the 2021 STIP payable on individual performance measures. The 2016 STIP mirrors the 2015 STIP for corporate performance based onwith substantially the same performance measures and associated weightings.for corporate performance as the 2020 STIP. For the 2021 STIP, income from operations

Integrated Leadership System

In 2014,was retained as a performance measure but with a reduced weighting, from 55% to 40%. The independent members of the Company launched a strategic organization initiative focused on implementing an integrated leadership system designed to increase organizational capabilities.

The new leadership system is designed to:

Optimize the organization’s structure;

Clarify each employee’s role and accountabilities;

Provide a robust approach to evaluating employees’ demonstrated effectiveness and long-term potential;

Improve leadership practices to enhance each employee’s opportunity to drive success individually and, ultimately, for the Company;

Better link compensation to individual performance; and

Improve the succession-planning process.

By focusing on providing the right tools for individual success, the Company strives to provide its employeesboard approved three additional metrics with the means to reach their full potentialfollowing weightings: productivity (7%), fixed costs (4%), and therefore, enhance shareholder value, product quality for our consumers, and the health and safetyusage of our employees.variable components (4%).

As part of this system, each year, the named executive officers are appraised on three elements: mastery of their basic roles, remarkable initiatives and behaviors that can have an adverse effect on their own effectiveness or of the team (known as “disruptive behaviors”). They are provided a rating from 0 to 3 for each element called “Demonstrated Effectiveness Appraisal” or DEA rating. Definitions and criteria have been developed to assess the appropriate rating. A named executive officer’s DEA rating for mastery of their basic role and disruptive behaviors can impact their annual base salary adjustments. However, while the DEA rating for remarkable initiatives does not drive base salary increases, it can be the basis for an individual discretionary award.

Individual Discretionary Awards

The independent members of the board of directors have historically focused on rewarding achievement of certain levels of performance based on corporate measures under the short-term incentive plan. With the implementation of an integrated leadership system, they have decided toconsidered whether they should exercise their discretion in granting cash awards for individual performance on a limited basis. When granted, the awards are discretionary and intended to reward those who have a high DEA rating foreffectiveness in an individual’s role and/or remarkable initiatives. Remarkable initiatives are measured based on three criteria: intensity, integration and innovation. However, atAt management’s recommendation, the committee did not approve any individual discretionary awards be granted to the named executive team membersofficers for 2015.2020.

Equity AwardsLTIP

The compensation committee grants equity awards as a long-term incentive and a significant portion of an executive’s total compensation package. With a significant portion of compensation tied to equity, executivesthe compensation committee believes that named executive officers can stay focused on maximizing stockholder value over the long term. UntilSince 2014, the compensation committee favored an equity mix of 50% in stock options and 50% in RSUs. Stock options allowed executives to share in the appreciation of the stock price and align their interests with shareholders. In 2014, to further align the compensation program with best practices and enhance its pay for performance philosophy, the compensation committee replaced stock options with PSUs and retained the grant of RSUs. As a result, the 2015 annual equity award consists of an equity mix of 50% in RSUs and 50% in PSUs.performance share units (“PSU”s). This combination emphasizes (i) the retention element of RSUs and PSUs and, in addition, for PSUs,the equity awards, (ii) the “at risk” nature of a portion of athe equity awards, and (iii) the tie to company performance for the PSUs.

For the named executive officer’s compensation.officers, the compensation committee made an annual equity award grant at its October 2020 meeting. It has a policy to set the grant date for annual awards in advance without regard to anticipated earnings or other major announcements and as a precaution against potential claims that equity awards are made at a time when the company and named executive officers are in possession of material non-public information. The compensation committee policy sets the grant date for the named executive officers’ annual awards as the eighth trading date after the release of third quarter earnings. This year’s annual equity award was approved by the independent members of the board with a November 16, 2020 grant date.

The size of the equity awards areis based on a percentage of salary taking into account market data.salary. While the compensation committee has discretion to adjust the size of the equity awards for an executive’s performance, the compensation committee chose not to exercise this discretion in respect of the 20152020 annual equity award. Since 2013, based on the compensation committee’s recommendation to the board and theThe independent members of the board approval,granted Mr. Garneau has acceptedLaflamme an annual equity award with a value equal to 225% of his base salary. However, similar to the 2011salary and 2012 STIP awards, Mr. Garneau requested that the compensation committee not recommend an equity award for him in either 2011 or 2012. The compensation committee honored those requests. The independent members of the board granted the other named executive officers, except Mr. Lalonde, equity awards with a value equal to 125% of their base salaries.

Since 2011, the compensation committee has made In recognition of Mr. Lalonde’s appointment as chief executive officer, Mr. Lalonde received an annual equity award grant at its October meeting. This year’s annual equity award was approved with a November 9, 2015 grant date.value equal to 225% of the base salary established for his new role.

The equity awards for the named executive officers are stock-settled and are subject to certain individual stock limits under the LTIP as an anti-dilution measure. The number of RSUs and PSUs awarded under the 20152020 annual equity grant for the named executive officers was determined by dividing 50% of the dollar value of the equity award by the volume weighted average of the highest and lowest prices per share at which our common stock was traded on the New York Stock Exchange on each of the five business days immediately before the November 9, 201516, 2020 grant date.date, or $4.97. However, using this formula, the number of RSUs and PSUs covered by Mr. Laflamme’s equity award would have exceeded the LTIP individual stock limits. As a result, Mr. Laflamme’s awards for 2020 were limited to 200,000 RSUs and 200,000 PSUs. To allow Mr. Laflamme to realize the full potential of his award value, the independent members of the board also granted Mr. Laflamme a cash-settled RSU award covering 24,940 RSUs.

The compensation committee favors grantingstock-settled RSU award will vest 25% on December 1 of each of the award later infour calendar years after the year to allowof grant for a 48 month vesting period. Mr. Laflamme’s cash-settled RSU will vest, ratably, on December 1 of each of the management team to demonstrate effectiveness before receiving an equitythree calendar years after the year of grant and hasfor a policy to set36 month vesting period (see the annual grant date in advance without regard to anticipated earnings or other major announcements and asPotential Payments Upon Termination” for a precaution against potential claims thatdescription of the applicable terms of the equity awards are madein connection with Mr. Laflamme’s departure on February 28, 2021). The three calendar year vesting period for cash-settled RSUs is intended to comply with Canadian tax law. For each vested cash-settled RSU at a time whensettlement, Mr. Laflamme will receive an amount in cash equal to an average market value. For this purpose, average market value is equal to the Company and named executive officers are in possession of material non-public information. The compensation committee policy sets the annual grant date for management awards as the eighth trading date after the releasevolume weighted average of the third quarter earnings.

    2015 Annual Equity Awards 

Named Executive Officer

  Performance  Share
Units
   Restricted  Stock
Units
 

Mr. Garneau

   148,873     148,873  

Ms. Longworth

   35,222     35,222  

Mr. Laflamme

   30,473     30,473  

Mr. Piché

   28,499     28,499  

Mr. Tremblay

   30,692     30,692  

The RSU award vests 25%highest and lowest prices per share at which our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange on each of the four anniversaries of the grant date, even though a three yearfive business days immediately preceding each vesting approach is more common. The longer vesting period is intended to emphasize the retention element of the awards.date.

In contrast, the 20152020 PSU award will vest on February 28, 20192024, and will be earned and payable as follows. Payout of the 2020 PSU award is based on achievement of the following two metrics which have different weightings. Multiple metrics balances both market performance and financial performance. Each performance measure has a payout range of 0% to 200%.

Performance Measure

Weight

Business Objective

Total shareholder return (“TSR”)

50Relative measure to peers; tracks shareholder experience

Return on strategic investments

50Direct link to financial priorities and efficient use of capital

TSR will be measured against a peer group and will payout depending on relative performance as follows:

 

TSR vs. Peers During
the Performance
Period

  20 percentage
points below
median
  10 percentage
points below
median
  Median  10 percentage
points above
median
  20 percentage
points above
median
 

Payout

   0  50  100  150  200

LOGORelative TSR will be measured each calendar year in the performance period. The payout levels for each calendar year will be divided by three to determine final payout of the TSR measure. However, if the company’s TSR is negative over the performance period, payouts that otherwise would have been more than 100% of target will be capped at 100% of target.

The peer group for measuring relative TSR includes the following companies, which has and may be adjusted as the compensation committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate. The peer group was determined by focusing on Canadian and U.S. public companies in the same business segments with more than 50% of sales generated from pulp, lumber, paper and/or tissue to provide alignment with our segment mix and business exposure. The peer group was calibrated to limit overexposure to any one segment. This peer group is different from the peer group used for compensation benchmarking which focuses on peers in similar industries with revenues and total enterprise value within a reasonable range of those of the company.

 

Canfor Corp

Rayonier Advanced Materials

Clearwater Paper Corp

Verso Corp — A

Domtar Corp

West Fraser Timber Co. LTD

Interfor Corp

Western Forest Products Inc.

Mercer International Inc.

The second measure focuses on the return on investment for strategic projects approved on or after January 1, 2018. Total payout will be calculated using a weighted average. Capital projects included for this performance measure include all wood products projects with an appropriation of funds greater than $500,000, pulp and paper projects with an appropriation of funds greater than $1,000,000 and corporate projects with an appropriation of funds greater than $1,000,000 and an assigned internal rate of return.

Original internal rate
of return (“IRR”) vs.
Actual IRR

  < 80% of
original IRR
  90% of
original IRR
  100% of
original IRR
  110% of
original IRR
  > 120% of
original IRR
 

Payout

   0  50  100  150  200

The

All of the equity awards contain customary provisions for accelerating vesting upon certain terminations and events, such as death and disability, all as further described in the narratives to the Summary Compensation Table. In all cases, the number of PSUs payable will be determined by actual performance results.results, subject to an individual maximum stock payout of 200,000 shares.

In addition, if a named executive officer retires, the equity awards—awards — both RSUs and PSUs—PSUs — may continue to vest. This feature is intended to attract and retain management with significant experience and encourage executivesnamed executive officers to postpone retirement. As a result, if a named executive officer retires at least six months after the grant date, he will be permitted to continue vesting in the award. For this purpose, “retirement” means the named executive officer is at least age 58 with at least two years of service, and the sum of his age and years of service equals or exceeds 62.5. In addition, the employeenamed executive officer must not be entitled to receive a severance package.

Retirement Plans and DC Make-Up Program

For 2015,2020, the president and chiefnamed executive officer and all senior vice presidentsofficers earned retirement benefits only under a tax-qualified retirement plan, subject to either Canadian or U.S. law. The tax-qualified retirement plans are offered to all eligible employees (not just executives), but limit the pay or contributions that may be considered pursuant to the applicable tax law. named executive officers).

Since 2012, the Companycompany has not offered any supplemental retirement plan that allows executivesnamed executive officers to currently accumulate, on a tax-deferred basis, additional retirement income.

However, because Companycompany contributions are limited in amount and type under the tax-qualified plans and the Companycompany believes executivesnamed executive officers should receive the benefit of the plans without regard to the limits. For simplified administration, since 2012, under a program referred to as theDC Make-Up Program,, the Companycompany pays executivesnamed executive officers a cash payment equal to the Companycompany contributions prescribed under the applicable tax-qualified plan formulas that exceed statutory limits. In addition, Canadian executivesnamed executive officers receive a cash payment equal to the employer contribution they would have received on their annual incentive awards as if the broad-based plan had provided an employer contribution on these awards. The named executive officers other than Mr. Tremblay each received payments under the DC Make-Up Program totaling 10% of their compensation. Mr. Tremblay received payments totaling 8.5% of his compensation. The DC Make-Up Program does not allow executivesnamed executive officers to accumulate earnings on a deferred basis. The payments made pursuant to the DC Make-Up Program are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table under All Other Compensation because the contributions are not deferred compensation. The executivesnamed executive officers pay tax on the cash payment and no gross-up or other earnings are provided on these payments. When combined with the company contributions received under the tax-qualified plans, Messrs. Laflamme, Lafave and Vachon each received an aggregate 2020 defined contribution program benefit totaling 10% of their compensation. Messrs. Lalonde and Tremblay received an aggregate 2020 defined contribution program benefit totaling 9% and 9.5% of their compensation, respectively.

Even though the Companycompany does not offer any supplemental retirement benefits that accumulate on a tax-deferred basis currently to executives,named executive officers, Messrs. Laflamme and PichéVachon previously earned supplemental defined benefits under Companycompany plans that were terminated effective upon the Company’scompany’s 2010 emergence from creditor protection proceedings. The supplemental defined benefits were reinstated under new arrangements pursuant to the plans of reorganization for Messrs. Laflamme and Piché,Vachon, and other employees who waived and forfeited all claims they had or may have had in the creditor protection proceedings in respect of any terminated supplemental retirement plan. The reinstated benefits are provided solely to honor prior contractual obligations, but with all supplemental defined benefits frozen as of December 31, 2010 based on service and earnings up to that date. None of the other named executive officers have any reinstated supplemental retirement benefits.

The frozen supplemental retirement benefits are paid using our general assets. For the Canadian executives, payments under a supplemental defined benefit plan are normally scheduled to be paid in monthly payments, which can generally be secured by a letter of credit pursuant to a retirement compensation arrangement without adverse tax consequences to the executive. The Company has established protocols to secure a letter of credit for eligible executives at age 55 that guarantees their frozen supplemental retirement benefits. The Company has secured a letter of credit per its protocols for Messrs. Laflamme and Piché.

Benefits provided through defined benefit plans are described more fully under Pension Benefits “Pension Benefits”. The defined contribution plan benefits are described under DC “DC Make-Up Program Program”.

Severance and Change in Control Arrangements

We believe that the Companycompany should provide reasonable severance benefits to its employees in the event of an involuntary termination without cause. With respect to the president and chief executive officer and allthe senior vice presidents, these severance benefits should reflect the fact that it may be difficult for them to find comparable employment within a short period of time. Severance benefits should help provide an opportunity for the Companycompany and former employees to part ways in an efficient and effective manner.

In the event of a change in control, we believe that the interests of stockholders will be best served if the interests of the president and chiefnamed executive officer and all senior vice presidentsofficers are aligned with them, and providing change in control benefits should eliminate, or at least reduce, the reluctance of senior executivesnamed executive officers to pursue potential change in control transactions that may be in the best interests of stockholders.

For each named executive officer except Mr. Garneau,for Messrs. Laflamme and Lalonde, severance protection is provided pursuant to the Company’scompany’s executive severance policy. The executive severance policy provides for a severance amount determined using a formula that provides six weeks of eligible pay per each year of service. Eligible pay takes into account base salary plus the average of the last two paid regular annual incentive awards, annualized, with a cap of 125% of the executive’s target incentive for the year of termination. The executive severance policy provides for a minimum of one year of severance and a maximum of two years of severance. Change in control protection under the executive severance policy does not provide greater severance amounts, but provides severance benefits if, within 12 months following a change in control, a senior executive resigns for good reason (i.e., due to conditions tantamount to a constructive dismissal).

The executive severance policy, in both a change in control or non-change in control context, does not provide any enhanced benefits in the form of, for example, subsidized continued health coverage or tax-gross ups. The impact of a termination on the current year incentive award and outstanding equity awards are determined pursuant to the incentive award and equity award plans.

Effective upon Mr. Garneau’s commencement of employment as president and chief executive officer on January 1, 2011, the Company entered intoLaflamme’s employment and change in control agreements provide him with Mr. Garneau, which agreements provide severance protection, the terms of which have been disclosed in lieurequired SEC filings. Effective March 1, 2021, Mr. Lalonde will receive severance protection pursuant to employment and change in control agreements, the terms of coveragewhich are disclosed in required SEC filings. The severance pay and benefits offered under the executive severance policy. Mr. Garneau’spolicy and Messrs. Laflamme’s and Lalonde’s employment agreement provides similar severance pay to the executive severance policy in the event he is terminated without cause absent a change in control. Mr. Garneau’sand change in control agreement provides an enhanced severance amountagreements are described later under “Severance and Change in the eventControl Arrangements.”

Perquisites

Perquisites are a small part of a termination without cause or good reason within 24 months after a change in control. The severance amount is equal to three times the sum of (i) his base salary in the year of termination, (ii) the average of the last two earned regular annual incentive awards, annualized, with a cap of 125% of his target incentive for the year of termination and (iii) the maximum amount of contributions the Company could have made on his behalf under the defined contribution plan program for the year of termination, plus $14,452 in lieu of outplacement services. In addition, Mr. Garneau’s outstanding equity awards would fully vest as of his termination date. The change in control agreement also provides subsidized continued health and life insurance coverage for up to three years following his termination date.

Perquisites

The named executive officers compensation. They are entitleddesigned to receive angive the executive officers flexibility in selecting the perquisites that are suitable to their needs for a given year, provide additional medical coverage and, if applicable, limit the executive’s tax liability to the liability in the executive’s home country. In short, the perquisites are:

A fixed annual allowance intended to cover expenses for fiscal and financial advice, and such other perquisites as chosen by the executive. If an executive is not covered by the Company’scompany’s Frequent Business Travelers Policy, then the annual allowance may also be used for tax preparation fees. Mr. Garneau has a $39,080 annual allowance and the other named executive officers have a $9,379 allowance ($12,000 in the case of Richard Tremblay). A fixed allowance balances the market practice of providing a certain level of perquisites with controlling costs to ensure the perquisites are not excessive. An annual allowance also provides the executives flexibility in selecting the perquisites that are suitable to their needs for a given year.

 

In addition, the Company also provides named executive officers with a comprehensiveComprehensive annual medical examination as well as a medical concierge service to allow for coordination of health needs in the event of medical issues, including while traveling abroad. In addition, if

If any of these executivesthe named executive officers are subject to taxation in both Canada and the U.S. as a result of their business travel, he or she is provided a payment under the Company’scompany’s Tax Equalization Policy generally equal to the difference between his or her respective home tax liability and actual taxes paid, as well as a gross-up on that difference. This payment is intended to limit the executive’s tax liability to the liability in the executive’s home country.

The compensation committee has discretion to approve additional perquisites from time to time. The named executive officers are responsible for any tax consequences related to their use and receipt of the perquisites.

Other Compensation Policies

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The compensation committee adopted stock ownership guidelines for all its senior vice presidents,management, including each of the named executive officers, and certain of its vice presidents. The ownership guideline is a multiple of the executive’s base salary. Under the guidelines, Mr. Garneauthe president and chief executive officer must own shares or share equivalents of Companycompany stock equal to 4.5 times base salary while the other named executive officers and other senior vice presidents must own shares or share equivalents of Companycompany stock equal to 2.5 times base salary. For purposes of the guidelines, all shares directly owned and unvested RSUs are included in the calculation. PSUs and unexercised stock options are not included in the calculation. Until the stock ownership requirement is met, executivesnamed executive officers must hold all shares (excluding shares withheld for taxes) received upon settlement of RSUs and PSUs and a number of shares equal to 50% of any gain realized upon option exercise. In 2017, the compensation committee updated the guidelines to require an executive who does not meet the guidelines to purchase shares with the net proceeds of any cash-settled awards.

To determine whether a named executive officer has met the stock ownership requirement, each named executive officer’s base salary is converted to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate at the time of measurement, and themeasurement. The shares

or share equivalents held by the named executive officer are calculated on the basis of the higher of the (i) price at time of settlement and (ii) fair market value of the common stock at the time of measurement. For each unvested RSU, the higher of the (i) grant value and (ii) fair market value of the common stock at the time of measurement is used in the calculation. The compensation committee annually reviews the extent to which the named executive officers have met the stock ownership requirement. In 2015, theAs of December 31, 2020, each named executive officersofficer held their shares in compliance with the guidelines but did not meetand met the stock ownership requirement consistent with their position as of December 31, 2015.such date.

Recoupment Policy

The company has maintained a recoupment policy since 2013, which applies to the named executive officers and all other current and former Section 16 officers of the company. In general, excess incentive and/or equity compensation is subject to recoupment if the company is required to restate its financial statements due to material noncompliance with a financial reporting requirement, whether or not as a result of misconduct by one or more officers covered by the policy. The company’s recoupment policy applies a look back to recoup such compensation received during the three year period before the date on which the company is required to prepare a restatement. The company also has discretion to recoup incentive and/or equity compensation paid to an officer who engages in misconduct in the performance of his duties, regardless of whether the misconduct involves a restatement of its financial statements. The company has the discretion to make all determinations under the policy.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

The company has adopted a policy prohibiting directors, officers and employees holding a title or function of vice president and higher from engaging in hedging, pledging, short selling or monetization of the company’s securities.

Deductibility of Compensation — Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code

In order to maintain flexibility to attract and retain qualified executives,Following the Companyelimination of the performance-based exception under Section 162(m) of the Code, the company considers the deductibility rules of Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code or the “Code,” to the extent applicable, but retains the discretionwith respect to make compensation awards whether or not the compensation is deductible.in effect before 2019 and grandfathered.

Compensation Committee ReportCOMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The following report does not constitute soliciting material and is not considered filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing by Resolute Forest Products Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

The independent members of the compensation committee have reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above with management and, based on such review and discussion, the independent members of the compensation committee recommended to the board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and in the Company’scompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2020.

Michael S. RousseauAlain Rhéaume (Chair)

Jennifer C. Dolan

Jeffrey A. HearnRandall C. Benson

David H. WilkinsMichael S. Rousseau

Tabular Disclosure of Executive Compensation

The following table sets forth information concerning all compensation earned by the Company’scompany’s named executive officers for 2013, 20142018, 2019 and 2015:2020:

Summary Compensation Table

 

Name and
Principal Position

 Year  Salary (1)  Bonus  Stock
Awards  (2)
  Option
Awards
  Non-Equity
Incentive

Plan
Compen-
sation (3)
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings (4)
  All
Other
Compen-

sation (5)
  Total 

Richard Garneau,

  2015   $980,905   $—     $2,245,004   $—     $484,522   $—     $210,876   $3,921,307  

President and chief

  2014    925,820    219,924    2,165,350    —      447,178    —      199,747    3,958,019  

executive officer

  2013    873,931    —      1,010,264    1,010,264    427,070    —      157,925    3,479,454  

Jo-Ann Longworth

  2015    427,400    —      531,148    —      206,344    —      85,921    1,250,813  

Senior vice president and

  2014    429,502    66,034    541,806    —      201,405    —      89,236    1,327,983  

chief financial officer

  2013    432,439    12,532    272,611    272,611    207,434    —      97,681    1,295,308  

Yves Laflamme,

  2015    368,278    —      459,532    —      178,517    —      78,429    1,084,756  

Senior vice president,

  2014    367,975    84,862    464,192    —      172,553    300,127    79,862    1,469,571  

wood products, procurement

and information technology

  2013    374,149    47,163    233,559    233,559    177,718    44,464    91,633    1,202,245  

André Piché

  2015    338,950    —      429,764    —      166,958    46,598    70,808    1,053,078  

Senior vice president,

tissue group

       

Richard Tremblay

  2015    351,464    —      462,836    —      179,801    —      415,737    1,409,838  

Senior vice president,

pulp and paper group

  2014    338,100    48,920    417,396    —      149,206    —      61,685    1,015,307  

Name and Position

 Year  Salary(1)  Bonus  Stock
Awards(2)
  Option
Awards
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(3)
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(4)
  All Other
Compen-
sation(5)
  Total 

Yves Laflamme

  2020  $894,633  $—    $1,988,000  $—    $1,363,222  $124,732  $184,617  $4,555,204 

President and chief

executive officer

  2019   913,125   —     1,552,000   —     882,290   198,791   265,980   3,812,186 
  2018   857,989   —     2,236,826   —     1,242,147   —     411,149   4,748,111 

Remi Lalonde

  2020   362,052   —     1,556,644   —     514,704   —     67,377   2,500,776 
Senior vice president and chief financial officer  2019   325,881   —     450,236   —     146,482   —     62,630   985,229 
  2018   204,977   —     257,954   —     361,177   —     99,488   923,596 

John Lafave

  2020   307,942   —     404,747   —     380,450   —     62,230   1,155,369 
Senior vice president,  2019   —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   
Pulp and paper sales and marketing  2018   326,969   —     452,366   —     405,246   —     277,518   1,462,099 
Richard Tremblay  2020   360,867   —     474,218   —     469,213   —     148,552   1,452,850 
Senior vice president,  2019   378,363   —     474,826   —     136,092   —     116,809   1,106,090 

pulp and paper group

  2018   390,582   —     540,624   —     478,764   —     384,059   1,794,029 
Jacques Vachon  2020   338,719   —     445,232   —     462,558   236,468   67,193   1,550,170 
Senior vice president,  2019   350,621   —     444,710   —     137,794   204,368   102,228   1,239,721 
corporate affairs and chief legal officer  2018   355,600   —     493,978   —     496,574   —     299,703   1,645,855 

 

1.

As described in the CD&A, in 2015, 52% of2020 and except for Mr. Laflamme, each named executive officer’s base salary was paid 68.9% in Canadian dollars and 31.1% was paid in U.S. dollars and 48% was paid in Canadian dollars.pursuant to the currency policy. Amounts paid in Canadian dollars have been converted to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate on the applicable payroll date. Mr. Laflamme received his base salary in U.S. dollars. As described in the CD&A, due to negative impacts of COVID-19 on the company’s capacity for its wood products and paper segments, the named executive officers had base salary reductions ranging from 5% to 15% for the second quarter. During the second quarter of 2020, Messrs Lafave, Tremblay and Vachon each had a base salary reduction of 10%, Mr. Lalonde had a base salary reduction of 5% and Mr. Laflamme had a base salary reduction of 15%. Mr. Lafave was not a named executive officer in 2019 and, as such, his compensation for 2019 is not disclosed as permitted by SEC guidance. His 2018 compensation is included consistent with prior disclosures as he was a named executive officer for 2018.

 

2.

Amounts in these columns reflect the aggregate grant date fair value under FASB ASC Topic 718 of RSUs, and the target level of PSUs, respectively, awarded to the named executive officers under the 20152020 annual equity award.award that are settled in stock. As described in the CD&A, Mr. Laflamme’s 2020 stock-settled equity award grant was limited by the individual stock limit of shares. As a result, the amount in this column reflects the grant date value of Mr. Laflamme’s stock-settled annual equity award grant of 200,000 RSUs and 200,000 PSUs.

The following shows the grant date values for RSU awards and target PSU awards as well as the grant date value for the 2020 PSU awards based on the maximum level of payout. For Mr. Laflamme, the table also shows his additional grant of 24,940 RSUs that will settle exclusively in cash, as described in the CD&A.

 

Name

  2015 Annual
RSU Award
   2015 Annual
PSU Award
   Total 2015
Equity Awards
  2020 Annual
RSU Award
 2020 Annual
RSU Award-
Cash Settled
 2020 Annual Target
PSU Award
 Total 2020
Equity Awards
 2020 Annual
Maximum
(200% of
Target PSU Award)
 

Richard Garneau

  $1,122,502    $1,122,502    $2,245,004  

Jo-Ann Longworth

   265,574     265,574     531,148  

Yves Laflamme

   229,766     229,766     459,532   $994,000  $123,952  $994,000  $2,111,952  $994,000 

André Piché

   214,882     214,882     429,764  

Remi Lalonde

 778,322   —    778,322  1,556,644  994,000 

John Lafave

 202,373   —    202,373  404,747  404,747 

Richard Tremblay

   231,418     231,418     462,836   237,109   —    237,109  474,218  474,218 

Jacques Vachon

 222,616   —    222,616  445,232  445,232 

The independent members2020 annual equity awards granted to the named executive officers represents a percentage of the board approvednamed executive officer’s base salary at the 2015 annualgrant date: 225% for Messrs. Laflamme and Lalonde and 125% for the other named executive officers. With the exception of Mr. Laflamme, the number of RSUs and PSUs awarded was determined by dividing 50% of the dollar value of the equity award by the volume weighted average of the highest and lowest prices per share at which our common stock was traded on October 26, 2015 with a November 9, 2015 grant date. The RSU award will vest 25%the New York Stock Exchange on each of the first four anniversariesfive business days immediately before the November 16, 2020 grant date, or $4.97. Mr. Laflamme’s grant is described above. The number of RSUs and target PSUs granted are shown below under the grant date. The“Grants of Plan-Based Awards.” Each 2020 PSU award will vest on February 28, 2019. For all named executive officers, both awards areis subject to a named executive officer’s continued employment with the Companymaximum stock payout of 200,000 shares to any one individual, which is reflected for Messrs. Laflamme and customary conditions for accelerated vesting or forfeiture upon the occurrence of certain employment-related events, as further described belowLalonde in the narrative disclosure to this table.“2020 Annual Maximum” column above.

 

3.

Amounts shown for 20152020 reflect annual cash incentive awards earned under the 20152020 STIP. For all eligible named executive officers except Mr. Laflamme, amounts earned reflect a percentage of the named executive officer’s base salary as of December 31, 2015, applying the Company’s currency policy with allocations between Canadian and U.S. dollars established as of January 1, 2015. Except for Mr. Tremblay, awards to the named executive

officers were2020, paid 68.9% in Canadian dollars and have been31.1% paid in U.S. dollars pursuant to the currency policy. The portion of bonus payable in Canadian dollars was converted to U.S. dollars as of December 31, 2015,using the date of the balance sheet includedaverage exchange rate for Canadian to U.S. dollars for 2020, or $0.7462. As described in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended the same date, or $0.7226.CD&A, Mr. Tremblay was paidLaflamme received his cash incentive award in U.S. dollars anddollars. Mr. Laflamme’s STIP award was in the table showsamount of $1,239,270. The amount shown for Mr. Laflamme for 2020 also reflects the actualgrant date value of his annual cash-settled RSU award covering 24,940 RSUs in the amount paid to him.of $123,952.

 

4.Amounts

Using discount rate and life expectancy assumptions consistent with those used in this column reflect an increase inthe company’s financial statements, the actuarial present value of benefits for Mr. Piché in the amount shown in the Summary Compensation Table,Messrs. Laflamme and no change in the actuarial present value of benefits for Mr. Laflamme pursuant to SEC rules,Vachon under applicable Canadian registered (i.e.(i.e., tax-qualified) and Canadian supplemental pension plans established by Resolute FP Canada Inc. or Resolute, the pension“pension plans,. In 2015, however, the actuarial present value of Mr. Laflamme’s benefits decreased increased in the amount of $70,330. Changes in the actuarial present value of pension plan benefits were determined using discount rate$124,732 and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in the Company’s financial statements.$236,468, respectively. The values of Canadian pension plan benefits for both Messrs. Laflamme and PichéVachon were converted to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate describedprevailing as of December 31, 2020, the date of the balance sheet included in footnote (3).the company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended the same date, or $0.7859. The changes in the actuarial present value of the benefits for 20152020 for Messrs. Laflamme and PichéVachon are attributable to the change in the discount rate for 2015 and2020, the interest growth under the pension plans. The actuarial present value of Mr. Laflamme’s benefits for 2015 also changed because he exceeded age 58, which isplans and the earliest age of entitlement tocontinued employment beyond unreduced benefits under the pension plans.retirement age. All benefits under the pension plans were frozen on or before December 31, 2010. Pursuant to the plans of reorganization, as of the Company’s December 9, 2010 emergence from creditor protection proceedings, all supplemental retirement plans were terminated, and the Company established new supplemental retirement plans to reinstate the benefits for participants who waived and forfeited any and all claims they had or may have had in the creditor protection proceedings in respect of any terminated supplemental retirement plan. Additional discussion of pension benefits is provided after the “Pension Benefits for 2015”2020” table below.

5.

Amounts paid in this column2020 include the following basic company contributions allocated on behalf of the named executive officers pursuant to the Defined Contribution Retirement Plan for Non-Unionized Employees of Resolute Forest Products (the registered defined contribution plan)plans and additional cash payments to the named executive officers under the DC Make-Up Program equal to (i) company contributions under the registered plan formulas in excess of statutory limits, and (ii) the employer contribution they would have received on their annual incentive awards as if the registered plan had provided an employer contribution on these awards:

 

Name

  Basic
Company
Contribution
   Additional
Cash
Payment
   Basic Company Contribution   Additional Cash
Payment
 

Richard Garneau

  $11,020    $143,746  

Jo-Ann Longworth

   11,089     54,302  

Yves Laflamme

   11,066     47,614    $12,204   $119,289 

André Piché

   11,078     39,602  

Remi Lalonde

   12,311    35,689 

John Lafave

   12,172    31,386 

Richard Tremblay

   22,525     25,077     27,075    20,135 

Jacques Vachon

   12,214    37,776 

For all named executive officers other than Mr. Tremblay, the cash payments shown above and the perquisite allowances next described were established in Canadian dollars and have been converted to U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate for Canadian to U.S. dollars for 2015,as of December 31, 2020, or $0.7816.$0.7859. The cash payment and the perquisite allowance were paid in U.S. dollars to Mr. Tremblay.

Additional perquisites include (i) a perquisite amount of $39,080$39,295 for Mr. Garneau,Laflamme, $12,000 for Mr. Tremblay and $9,379$9,431 for all other named executive officersMessrs. Lalonde, Lafave and Vachon covering personal transportation, fiscal/financial advice, etc., (ii) a comprehensive annual medical examination with a value up to $4,690$2,358 for Mr. Garneau andLaflamme as well as his spouse and up to $2,345$1,179 for Ms. LongworthMessrs. Lalonde, Lafave, Tremblay and Messrs. Laflamme and PichéVachon and their spouses (if any), (iii) an annual medical referral with a value up to $782$786 for all named executive officers other than Mr. Tremblay and their spouses and dependents (if any), (iv) a medical concierge service with a value of $1,172$1,179 for all named executive officers other than Mr. Tremblay, (v) coverage under the company’s broad-based welfare benefit programs for salaried employees, (vi) parking for all named executive officers, and (vi)(vii) annual membership dues for two private clubs for Mr. Garneau and one private club for Ms. Longworth.

In addition, in 2015, the compensation committee approved a payment of $234,215 toMessrs. Laflamme, Lalonde, Lafave and Vachon which memberships are used for business purposes only. Mr. Tremblay in respect of the anticipated equity loss on the sale of his home in Virginia, to be incurred as a result of his agreement to relocate his residence to a U.S. location closer to the Company’s corporate headquarters. Mr. TremblayLalonde also received a paymentan allowance of $10,000 pursuant to the Resolute Forest Products Relocation Policy. According to this policy, an employee who is relocated is entitled to a miscellaneous expense allowance in the amount of one month’s base salary, up to $10,000.$566 for his personal mobile phone.

Finally, for Mr. Tremblay, the amount in this column includes a $104,543$73,766 payment under the Company’scompany’s Tax Equalization Policy, as described in the CD&A, in respect of his total compensation, which was subject to taxation in the U.S. and Canada.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 

Name

 Equity
Award
Grant

Date
 Date of
Board
Approval
of Equity
Award
 Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (1)
 Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (2)
 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares of
Stock
or Units(3)
  Grant
Date
Fair
Value

of Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)
  Equity
Award
Grant
Date
 Date of
Board
Approval
of Equity
Award
 Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)
 Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(2)
  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units(3)
 Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards(4)
($)
 
 Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
  Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
 

Richard Garneau

 11/09/2015 10/26/2015        148,873    1,122,502  
 11/09/2015 10/26/2015     74,437    148,873    223,310     1,122,502  
 n/a n/a  490,550    981,099    1,471,649       

Jo-Ann Longworth

 11/09/2015 10/26/2015        35,222    265,574  
 11/09/2015 10/26/2015     17,611    35,222    52,833     265,574  
 n/a n/a  208,911    417,821    626,732       

Yves Laflamme

 11/09/2015 10/26/2015        30,473    229,766   11/16/2020 10/29/2020       224,940  1,117,952 
 11/09/2015 10/26/2015     15,237    30,473    45,710     229,766   11/16/2020 10/29/2020     200,000  200,000   994,000 
 n/a n/a  180,738    361,476    542,214        n/a n/a 398,924  938,644  1,619,161      

André Piché

 11/09/2015 10/26/2015        28,499    214,882  

Remi Lalonde

 11/16/2020 10/29/2020       156,604  778,322 
 11/16/2020 10/29/2020     156,604  200,000   778,322 
 n/a n/a 171,234  402,902  695,007      

John Lafave

 11/16/2020 10/29/2020       40,719  202,373 
 11/09/2015 10/26/2015     14,250    28,499    42,749     214,882   11/16/2020 10/29/2020     40,719  81,438   202,373 
 n/a n/a  169,036    338,071    507,107        n/a n/a 139,893  329,159  567,799      

Richard Tremblay

 11/09/2015 10/26/2015        30,692    231,418   11/16/2020 10/29/2020     47,708  237,109 
 11/09/2015 10/26/2015     15,346    30,692    46,038     231,418   11/16/2020 10/29/2020     47,708  95,416   237,109 
 n/a n/a  182,038    364,076    546,114        n/a n/a 163,905  385,658  665,261      

Jacques Vachon

 11/16/2020 10/29/2020     44,792  222,616 
 11/16/2020 10/29/2020     44,792  89,584   222,616 
 n/a n/a 153,886  362,084  624,594      

 

1.Amounts

The amounts shown in these columns represent the “Threshold,” “Target” and “Maximum” payout potential under the 20152020 STIP before application of the aggregate payout limit of 7%5% of free cash flow, which could potentially reduce the payout on STIP awards despite achievement of the applicable performance measures. Amounts actually earned by the named executive officers under the 20152020 STIP are shown in the “Non-Equity“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table. Except for Mr. Laflamme, the payout potential is based on the named executive officers’ base salaries as of December 31, 2020, payable 68.9% in Canadian dollars and 31.1% in U.S. dollars pursuant to the currency policy. The payout potential is based on the named executive officers’ base salaries as of December 31, 20152020 (expressed in U.S. dollars based on the exchange rate for Canadian to U.S. dollars as of that date, or $0.7226)$0.7859). As described in the CD&A, Mr. Laflamme received his payout in U.S. dollars.

 

2.

Amounts shown in these columns represent the potential number of shares of Companycompany stock that could vest pursuant to the 20152020 PSU award if the average STIP payment percentage for corporate measures for 2016, 2017 and 2018 (disregarding application of the aggregate payout limit of 7% of free cash flow) meets the annual “Threshold,” “Target” or “Maximum” performance levels established for the 2016, 2017 and 2018 STIP,2020 PSU equity award are met, as further described in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis.CD&A. There is no “Threshold” payout for the 2020 PSU.

 

3.

Amounts shown in this column show the number of RSUs awarded in 2015.2020. For Mr. Laflamme, the amount in this column includes both his stock-settled and cash-settled 2020 RSU grant, as described in the CD&A.

4.

Amounts reflect grant date fair market value of RSUs and PSUs.

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following is a discussion oftable provides additional detail to the plans, policiesquantitative information and arrangements governing the compensation awarded to our named executive officers, asfootnotes set forth in the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards table above. Compensation to which a named executive officer may be entitled upon a severance from

employment, whether or not in connection with a change in control, is addressed below in Severance and Change in Control Arrangements.

For 2015, the primary elements of each named executive officer’s total compensation were base salary, cash awards pursuant to the Company’s short-term incentive plan, and long-term equity awards consisting of RSUs and PSUs granted on November 9, 2015. The DC Make-Up Program provides contributions limited under registered tax-qualified defined contribution plans in lieu of tax-deferred benefits that would otherwise be available under a supplemental defined contribution plan.

Base Salary

In 2015, 52% of each named executive officer’s base salary was paid in U.S. dollars and 48% was paid in Canadian dollars, based on the geographic location of the Company’s pulp and paper production capacity as of December 31, 2014. For reasons described in the CD&A, the Summary Compensation Table reflects an increase in base salary from the 2014 levels and shows amounts actually paid in 2015. The increases described in the CD&A resulted in annual base salaries of $981,099, $417,821, $361,476, $338,071, and $364,076 for Mr. Garneau, Ms. Longworth and Messrs. Laflamme, Piché and Tremblay, respectively, as of December 31, 2015.

Short-Term Incentive Compensation — 2015 STIP Awards

The named executive officers participated in the 2015 STIP, the material terms of which are described above in the CD&A. The threshold, target and maximum awards were 50%, 100% and 150% of base salary, respectively, and the applicable performance metrics were:

generating targeted income from operations;

control of selling, general and administrative expenses, or “SG&A cost;”

frequency of safety incidents (i.e., the OSHA incident rate — measured by the number of recordable incidents, multiplied by 200,000 and divided by the total number of hours worked);

severity of safety incidents (measured by the number of days due to lost time incidents and incidents resulting in temporary assignments or restricted work, multiplied by 200,000 and divided by the total number of hours worked); and

reduction of the number of Class 1 and 2 environmental incidents, as defined by our environmental policy (measured by year-over-year improvement).

The following table shows the threshold, target and maximum levels for each performance metric, as well as the applicable weighting assigned to each performance metric for purposes of determining awards to the named executive officers:

   Performance Level  Performance Metric Weighting
(% of  STIP award)
 

Performance Metric

  Threshold  Target  Maximum   

Income from operations

  $158 million   $197 million   $236 million   Income from operations  50

SG&A cost

  $146 million   $141 million   $136 million   SG&A cost or

profit per metric ton

  25

Safety – Frequency
(OSHA incident rate)

   1.05    0.95    £0.85 point   Safety – Frequency

(OSHA incident rate)

  15

Safety – Severity rate

   30    27    £24 points   Safety – Severity rate  5

Environmental Incidents

   4%    8%    ³12%   Environmental Incidents  5

As described in the CD&A above, the Company generated income from operations below the threshold level; had SG&A cost between the threshold and target performance levels; and achieved an OSHA rate, a severity rate and improvement in environmental incidents at the maximum performance level. However, based on these results, total payouts to all Resolute employees eligible to the 2015 STIP would have exceeded 7% of the free cash flow generated by the Company in 2015. As a result, all payouts under the 2015 STIP were reduced to meet the cap. In light of the foregoing, the compensation committee recommended, and the board approved, 2015 STIP awards to Ms. Longworth and Messrs. Garneau, Laflamme, Piché and Tremblay at a level equal to 47.82% of their respective base salaries, as of December 31, 2015, with allocations between Canadian and U.S. dollars as established for 2015.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation — Equity Awards

As described in the CD&A, on October 26, 2015, the independent members of the board approved equity awards of RSUs and PSUs to each of the named executive officers under the equity incentive plan in respect of their 2015 service with the Company.

The 2015 annual equity award granted to Mr. Garneau had a value of $2,245,004, representing 225% of his base salary. The 2015 annual equity awards granted to Ms. Longworth and Messrs. Laflamme, Piché and Tremblay had values of $531,148, $459,532, $429,764, $462,836 and $401,022, respectively, representing 125% of their base salaries as of the grant date. The 2015 annual equity award is the largest portion of an executive’s total direct compensation, representing 38% of total direct compensation for the named executive officers (except for Mr. Garneau, where the percentage is 53%).

To determine the shares under both the RSU and PSU portions of the 2015 annual equity award, the compensation committee divided (i) 50% of the total award value by (ii) the volume weighted average of the highest and lowest prices per share at which the Company’s common stock was traded on the NYSE on each of the five business days immediately before the November 9, 2015 grant date, or $7.54.

For all named executive officers, the 2015 RSU awards vest 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date as long as the executive remains employed through the applicable vesting dates. The 2015 PSU awards vest 100% on February 28, 2019 as long as the executive remains employed through that date. Additional RSUs and PSUs will be credited on unvested RSUs and PSUs, respectively, representing a number that is equivalent to any dividends that the Company may declare on its stock. RSUs and PSUs are settled in Company common stock upon vesting. In the case of PSUs, the number of shares of Company stock earned and vested will equal (i) the average of the actual payout percentage determined for achievement of the corporate measures under the STIPs for 2016, 2017 and 2018, multiplied by (ii) the number of PSUs granted in the 2015 annual equity award. The aggregate payout limit of 7% of free cash flow is disregarded when determining the actual payout percentage.

The following table describes key grant provisions of the RSUs and PSUs and the effect of a named executive officer’s termination before the applicable vesting dates:dates. See the “Potential Payments Upon Termination” for a description of the applicable terms of the equity awards in connection with Mr. Laflamme’s departure on February 28, 2021:

 

Key Provisions

  

RSU Awards

  

PSU Awards

General Provisions
Vesting and Settlement

25% on December 1 of each of the four calendar years after the year of grant as long as the executive remains employed through the applicable vesting dates

Mr. Laflamme’s cash-settled RSU award vests in one-third increments on December 1 of each of the three calendar years after the year of grant as long as he remains employed through the applicable vesting dates

100% on February 28, 2024, as long as the executive remains employed through that date
Dividend EquivalentsAdditional RSUs and PSUs will be credited in additional share units on unvested RSUs and PSUs, respectively, representing a number that is equivalent to any dividends that the company may declare on its stock
Payout Value

Each stock-settled RSU has a value equal to one share of stock

Each cash-settled RSU for Mr. Laflamme has a value equal to the volume weighted average of the highest and lowest prices per share at which our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange on each of the five business days immediately preceding the vesting date

The number of shares of company stock earned and vested will be based on the achievement of the performance measures for the three calendar year period that begins after the grant date (“performance period”), as described in the CD&A
Termination for Cause / Resignation Before Age 55 and Before Retirement Eligibility

Vesting and

Settlement

  All unsettled RSUs will be cancelledcanceled  All unsettled PSUs will be cancelledcanceled
Retirement On or After May 9, 201616, 2021 (Six Month Anniversary of Grant Date)

Vesting

  RSUs continue to vest on each anniversary of grantvesting date through November 9, 2019December 1, 2024 (December 1, 2023 for cash-settled RSUs vesting over three years)  PSUs become 100% vested on retirementcontinue to vest through February 28, 2024, as if executive remained employed through that date

Settlement

  RSUs are settled following each vesting date  PSUs are settled onimmediately following February 28, 20192024, based on average actual payout percentageachievement of the performance measures for corporate measures under STIP for 2016, 2017 and 2018the performance period

Key Provisions

RSU Awards

PSU Awards

Retirement Before May 9, 2016 / Resignation16, 2021 /Resignation On or After Age 55 / Involuntary/Involuntary Termination Without Cause

Vesting

  Pro rata vesting of RSUs equal to (i) the total number of RSUs awarded plus any dividend equivalents, multiplied by (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months elapsed sincefrom December 1 after the grant date and the denominator of which is 48 (36 for Mr. Laflamme’s cash-settled RSU award), including the portion that has already vested  Pro rata vesting of PSUs equal to (i) the total number of PSUs awarded plus any dividend equivalents, multiplied by (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months elapsed since the grant date and the denominator of which is 40

Settlement

RSUs are settled following the retirement or termination datePSUs are settled on February 28, 2019pro ratabased on average actual payout percentage for corporate measures under STIP for 2016, 2017 and 2018
Death or Disability

Vesting and

Settlement

upon Death

or Disability

from Grant Date through December 31, 2015

RSUs scheduled to vest on the next anniversary of the grant date (i.e., November 9) automatically vest on the death or disability date, and are settled by March 15 of the following year

•     Pro rata vesting of PSUs equal to (i) the total number of PSUs awarded plus any dividend equivalents, multiplied by (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months elapsed from December 1 after the grant date through December 31, 2015the retirement date or last day worked and the denominator of which is 40

•     PSUs are settled by March 15, 2016,pro ratabased on average actual payout percentage for corporate measures under STIP for 2015

Key Provisions

RSU Awards

PSU Awards

39
Vesting and Settlement upon Death or Disability On and After January 1, 2016  Same as aboveRSUs are settled following the retirement or termination date  

•    PSUs are settled on February 28, 2024, based on actual achievement of the performance measures for the performance period

Death
VestingPro rata vesting of RSUs equal to (i) the number of RSUs vested plus any dividend equivalents as of the date of death plus (ii) the RSUs scheduled to vest on the next vesting dateDuring the Performance Period: Pro rata vesting of PSUs equal to (i) the total number of PSUs awarded plus any dividend equivalents, multiplied by (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months elapsed from December 1 after the grant date through December 31 of the year of death or disability and the denominator of which is 40

•    39

On/After Grant Date and Before the Performance Period: Pro rata vesting of PSUs equal to (i) the total number of PSUs awarded plus any dividend equivalents, multiplied by (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months elapsed from December 1 after the grant date through December 31 of the first calendar year of the performance period and the denominator of which is 39
SettlementRSUs are settled following the deathPSUs are settled following the death based on estimated actual performance as of December 31 of the calendar year that contains the participant’s date of death, as approved by the immediatelycompensation committee.
Disability
VestingPro rata vesting of RSUs equal to (i) the number of RSUs settled plus any dividend equivalents as of the date of disability plus (ii) the RSUs scheduled to vest on the next vesting dateDuring the Performance Period: Pro rata vesting of PSUs equal to (i) the total number of PSUs awarded plus any dividend equivalents, multiplied by (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months elapsed from December 1 after the grant date through December 31 of the year the participant becomes disabled plus any months after the participant returns to active employment through the end of the vesting period and the denominator of which is 39

Key Provisions

RSU Awards

PSU Awards

On/After Grant Date and Before the Performance Period: Pro rata vesting of PSUs equal to (i) the total number of PSUs awarded plus any dividend equivalents, multiplied by (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months elapsed from December 1 after the grant date through December 31 of the first calendar year of the performance period plus any months after the participant returns to active employment after the first calendar year and the denominator of which is 39
SettlementThe additional tranche of the RSUs are settled as of the next scheduled vesting date after the participant’s disabilityPSUs are settled on February 28, 2024, based on actual achievement of the performance measures for the performance period

Equity Awards

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2020

      Option Awards   Stock Awards 
   Grant Date(1)  Number of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised Options
   Option
Exercise
Price
   Option
Expiration
Date
   Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units That
Have Not
Vested(2)
 

Name                                 

 Exercisable   Unexercisable 

Yves Laflamme

   01/09/2011(3)   24,092     $23.05    01/09/2021    —    $—   
   11/03/2011(3)   6,354    —      16.45    11/03/2021    —     —   
   11/08/2012(3)   21,228    —      11.41    11/08/2022    —     —   
   11/06/2013(3)   22,898    —      15.66    11/06/2023    —     —   
   11/13/2017   —      —      —      —      8,412(4)   55,013 
   11/13/2017   —      —      —      —      33,647(5)   220,051 
   11/12/2018   —      —      —      —      44,656(6)   292,050 
   11/12/2018   —      —      —      —      89,313(7)   584,107 
   11/11/2019   —      —      —      —      150,000(8)   981,000 
   11/11/2019   —      —      —      —      200,000(9)   1,308,000 
   11/16/2020   —      —      —      —      200,000(10)   1,308,000 
   11/16/2020   —      —      —      —      200,000(11)   1,308,000 

Remi Lalonde

   11/03/2011(3)   4,067    —      16.45    11/03/2021    —     —   
   11/08/2012(3)   6,328    —      11.41    11/08/2022    —     —   
   11/06/2013(3)   4,883    —      15.66    11/06/2023    —     —   
   11/28/2018   —      —      —      —      9,012(6)   58,937 
   11/28/2018   —      —      —      —      23,810(7)   155,717 
   11/11/2019   —      —      —      —      43,515(8)   284,588 
   11/11/2019   —      —      —      —      58,020(9)   379,451 
   11/16/2020   —      —      —      —      156,604(10)   1,024,190 
   11/16/2020   —      —      —      —      156,604 (11)   1,024,190 

John Lafave

   01/09/2011(3)   11,860    —      23.05    01/09/2021    —     —   
   11/03/2011(3)   11,214    —      16.45    11/03/2021    —     —   
   11/08/2012(3)   18,389    —      11.41    11/08/2022    —     —   
   11/06/2013(3)   20,319    —      15.66    11/06/2023    —     —   
   11/13/2017   —      —      —      —      6,986(4)   45,687 
   11/13/2017   —      —      —      —      27,944(5)   182,754 
   11/12/2018   —      —      —      —      9,030(6)   59,056 
   11/12/2018   —      —      —      —      18,062(7)   118,125 
   11/11/2019   —      —      —      —      39,169(8)   256,165 
   11/11/2019   —      —      —      —      52,225(9)   341,552 
   11/16/2020   —      —      —      —      40,719(10)   266,302 
   11/16/2020   —      —      —      —      40,719(11)   266,302 

Richard Tremblay

   11/03/2011(3)   11,483    —      16.45    11/03/2021    —     —   
   11/08/2012(3)   17,937    —      11.41    11/08/2022    —     —   
   11/06/2013(3)   13,435    —      15.66    11/06/2023    —     —   
   11/13/2017   —      —      —      —      8,349(4)   54,601 
   11/13/2017   —      —      —      —      33,395(5)   218,403 
   11/12/2018   —      —      —      —      10,793(6)   70,586 
   11/12/2018   —      —      —      —      21,586(7)   141,172 
   11/11/2019   —      —      —      —      45,892(8)   300,134 
   11/11/2019   —      —      —      —      61,189(9)   400,176 
   11/16/2020   —      —      —      —      47,708(10)   312,010 
   11/16/2020   —      —      —      —      47,708(11)   312,010 

      Option Awards   Stock Awards 
   Grant Date(1)  Number of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised Options
   Option
Exercise
Price
   Option
Expiration
Date
   Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units That
Have Not
Vested(2)
 

Name                                 

 Exercisable   Unexercisable 

Jacques Vachon

   01/09/2011(3)   25,203    —     $23.05    01/09/2021    —    $—   
   11/03/2011(3)   21,606    —      16.45    11/03/2021    —     —   
   11/08/2012(3)   37,064    —      11.41    11/08/2022    —     —   
   11/06/2013(3)   26,652    —      15.66    11/06/2023    —     —   
   11/13/2017   —      —      —      —      7,554(4)   49,403 
   11/13/2017   —      —      —      —      30,218(5)   197,626 
   11/12/2018   —      —      —      —      9,862(6)   64,497 
   11/12/2018   —      —      —      —      19,724(7)   128,995 
   11/11/2019   —      —      —      —      42,981(8)   281,096 
   11/11/2019   —      —      —      —      57,308(9)   374,794 
   11/16/2020   —      —      —      —      44,792(10)   292,940 
   11/16/2020   —      —      —      —      44,792(11)   292,940 

1.

The equity awards made to the named executive officers that were outstanding as of December 31, 2020, were the stock options granted in 2011 through 2013, the RSUs granted in 2017 through 2020, and PSUs granted in 2017 through 2020 under the equity incentive plan. In 2014, the compensation committee ceased granting stock options and began granting PSUs instead.

2.

The fair market value shown is based on the per-share closing trading price on the NYSE of shares of the company’s common stock on December 31, 2020, or $6.54.

3.

These awards are fully vested and exercisable.

4.

The 2017 RSU award vests ratably in one-fourth tranches on December 1 of each calendar year following March 15,pro rata basedthe year of grant: December 1, 2021. The first three tranches vested December 1, 2018, December 1, 2019, and December 1, 2020. As described in the CD&A, Mr. Lalonde was not eligible to receive an equity grant in 2017.

5.

The 2017 PSU vested on February 28, 2021, with the number of shares paid out dependent on the average actual payout percentage for corporate measures under the STIP for 2018, 2019, and 2020. Based on the completedaverage STIP payout for these years before payout

Key Definitions

“Disability”

The named executive officer’s eligibility for long-term disability benefits under a Company-sponsored plan

“Retirement”

•    Attainment(before application of age 58; and

•    Completionthe applicable free cash flow limit), 113.2% of at least two years of service; and

•    Having a combined age and years of service (counting partial years) equal to at least 62.5; and

•    Not being entitledthe PSUs granted in 2017 were paid out. As described in the CD&A, Mr. Lalonde was not eligible to receive a severance package

Employment Agreements and Offer Letters

The material terms of each officer’s employment arrangement are identified below, but any severance arrangement to which a named executive officer may be subject upon certain termination events, whether or not in connection with a change in control, is described below under Severance and Change in Control Arrangements.

Mr. Garneau

The Company entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Mr. Garneau, dated February 26, 2014. The employment agreement continues in effect until death, disability, retirement or written notice of termination by Mr. Garneau or the Company, with certain ongoing restrictive covenants as described below. Mr. Garneau’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary, subject to periodic adjustments. His base salary is evaluated annually by the compensation committee. TheBase Salary section of this narrative disclosure provides more detail regarding his 2015 base salary. Under the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Garneau is also eligible to receive an annual incentive, as approved by the independent members of the board, under the Company’s annual short-term incentive plans adopted from time to time. In addition, under his employment agreement, Mr. Garneau is eligible to receive awards under the equity incentive plan and other benefits and perquisites.

Mr. Garneau is subject to a covenant not to disclose confidential information during the term of the agreement and for five years thereafter. In addition, Mr. Garneau is subject to covenants not to compete with the Company, solicit customers of the Company or interfere with suppliers of the Company during the term of the agreement and, except as provided in his change in control agreement, for nine months thereafter (12 months in the case of a termination for “cause” (as defined under the employment agreement)).

Ms. Longworth and Messrs. Laflamme, Piché and Tremblay

Ms. Longworth and Messrs. Laflamme, Piché and Tremblay were employed pursuant to the following offer letters entered into with the Company:

Name

Effective Date

Position on Effective Date

Jo-Ann Longworth

August 31, 2011Senior vice president and chief financial officer

Yves Laflamme

January 17, 2011Senior vice president, wood products, procurement and information technology

André Piché

February 4, 2014Senior vice president, pulp and paper operations

Richard Tremblay

February 4, 2014Senior vice president, pulp and paper operations

The offer letters entered into with Ms. Longworth and Messrs. Laflamme, Piché and Tremblay provide for an annual base salary. Base salaries are evaluated annually by the compensation committee. TheBase Salary section of this narrative disclosure provides more detail regarding the 2015 base salaries for Ms. Longworth and Messrs. Laflamme, Piché and Tremblay.

Under their offer letters, Ms. Longworth and Messrs. Laflamme, Piché and Tremblay were eligible to receive annual incentives under the annual short-term incentive plans adopted by the Company from time to time, with a target payout of 100% of base salary. In 2015, they participated in the 2015 STIP with the same payout potential. They were also eligible to receive awards under the equity incentive plan, as determined by the board. Additionally, throughout their periods of employment in 2015, Ms. Longworth and Messrs. Laflamme, Piché and Tremblay were eligible for other benefits and perquisites.

Equity Awards

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2015

The equity awards made to the named executive officers that were outstanding as of December 31, 2015 were the stock options granted in 2011 through 2013, the RSUs granted in 2012 through 2015, and PSUs granted in 2014 and 2015 under the equity incentive plan. The terms of the 2015 annual equity award are described in the narrative disclosure to the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards table. The 2011 and 2012 annual equity awards have the same terms. The 2013 annual equity award generally mirrors the 2011 and 2012 annual equity award. As described in the CD&A, in 2014, the compensation committee retained the grant of RSUs on generally the same terms as the 2011 through 2013 awards, but replaced stock options with PSUs. RSUs and PSUs were again granted in 2015 on generally the same terms as the 2014 awards.

       Option Awards   Stock Awards 
       Number of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised Options
  Option
Exercise
Price
   Option
Expiration
Date
   Number of
Shares or
Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units
That Have
Not
Vested(8)
 

Name

  Grant
Date
   Exercisable   Unexercisable       

Richard Garneau

   01/09/2011     9,302     —  (1) $23.05     01/09/2021     —     $—    
   11/06/2013     66,031     66,030(3)   15.66     11/06/2023     —      —    
   11/06/2013     —       —      —       —       32,256(3)   244,178  
   11/06/2014     —       —      —       —       43,632(4)   330,294  
   11/06/2014     —       —      —       —       58,177(5)   440,400  
   11/09/2015     —       —      —       —       148,873(6)   1,126,969  
   11/09/2015     —       —      —       —       148,873(7)   1,126,969  

Jo-Ann Longworth

   11/03/2011     26,166     —  (1)  16.45     11/03/2021     —      —    
   11/08/2012     36,283     12,094(2)  11.41     11/08/2022     —      —    
   11/08/2012     —       —      —       —       5,925(2)  44,852  
   11/06/2013     17,818     17,817(3)   15.66     11/06/2023     —      —    
   11/06/2013     —       —      —       —       8,704(3)   65,889  
   11/06/2014     —       —      —       —       10,917(4)   82,642  
   11/06/2014     —       —      —       —       14,557(5)   110,196  
   11/09/2015     —       —      —       —       35,222(6)   266,631  
   11/09/2015     —       —      —       —       35,222(7)   266,631  

Yves Laflamme

   01/09/2011     24,092     —  (1)  23.05     01/09/2021     —      —    
   11/03/2011     6,354     —  (1)  16.45     11/03/2021     —      —    
   11/08/2012     10,614     10,614(2)  11.41     11/08/2022     —      —    
   11/08/2012     —       —      —       —       5,200(2)  39,364  
   11/06/2013     7,633     15,265(3)   15.66     11/06/2023     —      —    
   11/06/2013     —       —      —       —       7,456(3)   56,442  
   11/06/2014     —       —      —       —       9,354(4)   70,810  
   11/06/2014     —       —      —       —       12,472(5)   94,413  
   11/09/2015     —       —      —       —       30,473(6)   230,681  
   11/09/2015     —       —      —       —       30,473(7)   230,681  

André Piché

   01/09/2011     9,868     —  (1)  23.05     01/09/2021     —      —    
   11/03/2011     9,569     —  (1)  16.45     11/03/2021     —      —    
   11/08/2012     13,149     4,382(2)  11.41     11/08/2022     —      —    
   11/08/2012     —       —      —       —       2,147(2)  16,253  
   11/06/2013     6,303     6,303(3)   15.66     11/06/2023     —      —    
   11/06/2013     —       —      —       —       3,078(3)   23,300  
   11/06/2014     —       —      —       —       8,410(4)   63,664  
   11/06/2014     —       —      —       —       11,214(5)   84,890  
   11/09/2015     —       —      —       —       28,499(6)   215,737  
   11/09/2015     —       —      —       —       28,499(7)   215,737  

Richard Tremblay

   11/03/2011     11,483     —  (1)  16.45     11/03/2021     —      —    
   11/08/2012     13,453     4,484(2)  11.41     11/08/2022     —      —    
   11/08/2012     —       —      —       —       2,197(2)  16,631  
   11/06/2013     6,718     6,717(3)   15.66     11/06/2023     —      —    
   11/06/2013     —       —      —       —       3,281(3)   24,837  
   11/06/2014     —       —      —       —       8,410(4)   63,664  
   11/06/2014     —       —      —       —       11,214(5)   84,890  
   11/09/2015     —       —      —       —       30,692(6)   232,338  
   11/09/2015     —       —      —       —       30,692(7)   232,338  

1.These awards are fully vested and exercisable.

2.Vests ratably in one-fourth tranches on each anniversary of the grant date: November 8, 2016. The first tranche vested November 8, 2013, the second tranche vested November 8, 2014 and the third tranche vested November 8, 2015.2017.

 

3.6.Vests

The 2018 RSU award vests ratably in one-fourth tranches on December 1 of each anniversary of the grant date: November 6, 2016calendar year: December 1, 2021, and November 6, 2017.December 1, 2022. The first tranchetwo tranches vested November 6, 2014December 1, 2019, and the second tranche vested November 6, 2015.December 1, 2020.

 

4.7.Vests ratably in one-fourth tranches on each anniversary of the grant date: November 6, 2016, November 6, 2017 and November 6, 2018.

The first tranche vested November 6, 2015.

5.Unvested2018 PSU award is unvested until February 28, 2018.2022. The award will become 100% vested on February 28, 2018,2022, with the number of shares paid out dependent on performance conditions as described in the narrative disclosure toCD&A for the Summary Compensation Table.2018 proxy.

 

6.8.Vests

The 2019 RSU award vests ratably in one-fourth tranches on December 1 of each anniversary of the grant date: November 9, 2016, November 9, 2017, November 9, 2018calendar year: December 1, 2021, December 1, 2022, and November 9, 2019.December 1, 2023. The first tranche vested December 1, 2020.

 

7.9.Unvested

The 2019 PSU award is unvested until February 28, 2019.2023. The award will become 100% vested on February 28, 2019,2023, with the number of shares paid out dependent on performance conditions as described in the narrative disclosure toCD&A for the Summary Compensation Table.2019 proxy.

 

8.10.

The fair market value shown2020 RSU award vests ratably in one-fourth tranches on December 1 of each calendar year: December 1, 2021, December 1, 2022, December 1, 2023, and December 1, 2024.

11.

The 2020 PSU award is basedunvested until February 28, 2024. The award will become 100% vested on February 28, 2024, with the per-share closing trading price on the NYSEnumber of shares ofpaid out dependent on performance conditions as described in the Company’s common stock on December 31, 2015, or $7.57.CD&A.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested for 20152020

The options that were exercisable in 20152020 were those awarded under the emergence equity award, approved upon emergence with a January 9, 2011 grant date, and under the 2011 through 2013 annual equity awards. The options approved on January 9, 2011 expired on January 8, 2021. None of the named executive officers exercised options in 2015.2020.

The number of shares acquired on the vesting of outstanding RSUs granted under the 20112016 through 20142019 annual equity awards, and the value realized on the applicable vesting dates, are set forth in the following table. For the 2016 annual equity award, the table also includes the number of shares acquired and value realized upon vesting of the PSUs in 2020.

 

 Stock Awards  Stock Awards 
 2011 Annual
Equity Award
 2012 Annual
Equity Award
 2013 Annual
Equity Award
 2014 Annual
Equity Award
  2016 Annual
Equity Award
 2017 Annual
Equity Award
 2018 Annual
Equity Award
 2019 Annual
Equity Award
  Aggregate
number
of shares
acquired
on vesting
in 2020
 Aggregate
value
realized on
vesting in
2020
 

Name

 Number of
shares
acquired on
vesting
 Value
realized on
vesting
 Number of
shares
acquired on
vesting
 Value
realized
on vesting
 Number of
shares
acquired on
vesting
 Value
realized
on vesting
 Number
of shares
acquired
on vesting
 Value
realized
on vesting
  Number
of shares
acquired
on vesting
 Value
realized
on vesting
 Number
of shares
acquired
on vesting
 Value
realized
on vesting
 Number
of shares
acquired
on vesting
 Value
realized
on vesting
 Number
of shares
acquired
on vesting
 Value
realized
on vesting
 

Richard Garneau (1)

  —     $—      —     $—      16,128   $124,347    14,545   $112,142  

Jo-Ann Longworth

  3,324    24,797    5,925    45,682    4,352    33,554    3,640    28,064  

Yves Laflamme

  3,229    24,088    5,200    40,092    3,729    28,751    3,118    24,040   94,214  $305,632  8,411  $46,680  22,328  $123,922  94,985  $527,167   219,938  $1,003,401(1) 

André Piché

  1,215    9,064    2,147    16,553    1,540    11,873    2,804    21,619  

Remi Lalonde

 28,111  91,191   —     —    5,952  33,034  14,505  80,503   48,568   204,728(2) 

John Lafave

 78,631  255,079  6,986  38,771  4,516  25,066  13,056  72,461   103,189   391,376 

Richard Tremblay

  1,459    10,884    2,197    16,939    1,641    12,652    2,804    21,619   93,971  304,843  8,350  46,341  5,396  29,948  15,297  84,898   123,014   466,030 

Jacques Vachon

 84,614  274,488  7,554  41,923  4,930  27,363  14,327  79,515   111,425   423,289 

 

1.Per

Under Mr. Garneau’s request,Laflamme’s November 2019 cash-settled award, he did not receive 2011 and 2012 annual equity awards.received the first tranche of 44,985 units settled in cash on December 1, 2020. These units had a total value of $249,667.

2.

Under Mr. Lalonde’s February 2018 cash-settled award, he received the first three tranches of 2,461 units settled in cash on December 1, 2018, December 2, 2019, and December 1, 2020. These units had a total value of $54,417.

Compensation Risk Assessment

In 2015,Annually, the Company,company, through an internal committee, assessedassesses whether any elements of the Company’scompany’s compensation policies and practices encourage excessive and unnecessary risk-taking, and, if so, whether the level of risk encouraged is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.company. The internal committee wasis composed of the senior vice president and chief financial officer; the senior vice president, corporate affairs and chief legal officer; the senior vice president, human resources; and members of the human resources staff. At inception, Hugessen Consulting provided input into the process and elements to review and provided

information on market best practices. The process identified the compensation plans and practices and related key features, assessed the risk related to each of them (taking into account enterprise risk) and compared the plan and practices with market best practices. In 2020, Hugessen Consulting provided updated information on market best practices and the internal committee concluded that no changes to the company’s compensation policies and practices were advisable. The compensation committee and Hugessen Consulting reviewed and commented on the internal committee’s findings.

Following this review, we believe that the design of our compensation policies and practices encourages employees to remain focused on both our short-term and long-term goals, and the compensation programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. For example, the issuance of PSUs in the annual equity grant aligns the executive team with the STIP metrics over a multi-year period, including overlapping performance periods.company.

Pension Benefits

This section describes the accumulated benefits, if any, of each of the named executive officers under Company-sponsoredcompany-sponsored defined benefit pension plans. The table below shows the present value of accumulated benefits, if any, payable to each of the named executive officers, including the number of years of service credited to them under each applicable plan. The benefits were determined using the interestdiscount rates and mortality ratelife expectancy assumptions consistent with those used in the Company’scompany’s financial statements.

Pension Benefits for 20152020

 

Name

  

Plan Name

  Number
of Years
Credited
Service
   Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit(1)
   Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
 
Richard Garneau(2)  n/a   —     $—     $—   
Jo-Ann Longworth(2)  n/a   —      —      —   
Yves Laflamme  Registered Plan (Canada)   28.51     1,191,473     —   
  Supplemental Plan (Canada)   28.51     1,713,727     —   
André Piché  Registered Plan (Canada)   24.00     1,044,079    
  Supplemental Plan (Canada)   24.00     526,291    
Richard Tremblay(2)  n/a   —      —      —   

Name(1)                                 

  

Plan Name

  Number
of Years
Credited
Service
   Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit(2)
   Payments
During
Last
Fiscal
Year
 

Yves Laflamme

  

Registered Plan (Canada)

   28.51   $1,652,182   $—   
  

Supplemental Plan (Canada)

   28.51    1,852,483    —   

Remi Lalonde

  

n/a

   —      —      —   
John Lafave  

n/a

   —      —      —   

Richard Tremblay

  

n/a

   —      —      —   

Jacques Vachon

  

Registered Plan (Canada)

   11.58    937,597    —   
  

Supplemental Plan (Canada)

   25.50    2,983,085    —   

 

1.

Messrs. Lalonde, Lafave, and Tremblay do not have accrued benefits in any company-sponsored defined benefit pension plans. Instead, their retirement benefits are provided exclusively through the company’s registered plans and the DC Make-Up Program. Retirement benefits for Messrs. Laflamme and Vachon for current service are similarly provided exclusively through these arrangements after December 31, 2010. The DC Make-Up Program is described in the CD&A.

2.

The present value of accumulated benefits under the Canadian registered and supplemental pension plans sponsored by Resolute FP Canada Inc. or Resolute is determined based on the assumptions used in the Company’scompany’s financial statements, as described in Note 1316 of the Consolidated Financial Statements, except that each named executive officer’s retirement age was assumed to be the earliest age upon which an unreduced pension is payable under the plan(s) in which he was a participant as of December 31, 2015,2020, the benefits includeare based on service earnedand earnings before January 1, 2011 and the values of Canadian pension plan benefits for Messrs. Laflamme and PichéVachon were converted to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate for Canadian to U.S. dollars as of December 31, 2015,2020, the date of the balance sheet included in the Company’scompany’s annual report onForm 10-K for the year ended the same date, or $0.7226.$0.7859. These assumptions are further described in the narratives below.

2.Ms. Longworth and Messrs. Garneau and Tremblay do not have accrued benefits in any Company-sponsored defined benefit pension plans. Instead, their retirement benefits are provided exclusively through the Company’s registered plan and the DC Make-Up Program. Retirement benefits for Messrs. Laflamme and Piché for current service are similarly provided exclusively through these arrangements after 2010. The DC Make-Up Program is further described below.

The named executive officers did not earn pension benefits in 2015, other than due to changes in their final average earnings under the Resolute FP Canada registered pension plan (as described below).

The following discussion describes the terms of the pension plans applicable to Messrs. Laflamme and PichéVachon for service and earnings before January 1, 2011. No other named executive officer has pension benefits accrued under defined benefit pension plans (either registered or the reinstated supplemental plans, both as described below).

Before their pension benefits were frozen as described below, Messrs. Laflamme and PichéVachon earned benefits under Canadian pension plans that were either registered or non-registered. A registered plan“registered plan” means the plan is intended to be qualified for favorable tax treatment under the Canadian Income Tax Act, or the Income“Income Tax Act.Act.” In contrast, a non-registered plan plan” is not qualified for this favorable tax treatment and provides to a select group of management and highly compensated employeesemployees’ additional pension benefits that cannot be provided under the registered plans because of statutory limitations or an overall benefit that is offset by the benefit provided under the registered plan.

Pursuant to the plans of reorganization, the non-registered plans were terminated and those accumulated benefits were reinstated under new non-registered plans, “the 2010 Canadian DB SERPs,” for certain participants, including Messrs. Laflamme and Piché.Vachon. The reinstated benefits were frozen as to benefit service and earnings (but not vesting service) as of December 31, 2010.

Messrs. Laflamme and PichéVachon have pension benefits payable under legacy Abitibi Canadian pension plans (now sponsored by Resolute FP Canada Inc.). Pension benefits under the 2010 Canadian DB SERPs were frozen for Messrs. Laflamme and PichéVachon effective December 31, 2010. However, pensionable earnings continue to growthe maximum pension payable from a registered plan under the registered planIncome Tax Act is indexed annually and may impactit impacts what is payable between the 2010 Canadian DB SERPs and the registered plan. The following describes the pension benefits payable under these plans.

The reinstated accrued benefits provided to Messrs. Laflamme and PichéVachon under the 2010 Canadian DB SERPs are determined pursuant to a traditional pension plan formula based on years of credited service and a percentage of final average compensation. The 2010 Canadian DB SERPs provide an overall pension benefit that is offset by the benefit payable under the registered plans, including any registered plan benefits that have been commuted. The registered plans limit the amount of the pension benefit payable due to statutory constraints.

Pension Formula

These Canadian pension plans generally provide total pension benefits equal to 2% of final average compensation multiplied by years of credited service with the Companycompany and its related entities, up to 35 years of service. As a result of the benefit service freeze described above, the pension benefits for Messrs. Laflamme and PichéVachon under the 2010 Canadian DB SERPs take into account their years of credited service through December 31, 2010.

Compensation used under the formulas depends on the period for which years of service are credited. For years of credited service through December 31, 2008, final average compensation is the sum of (i) average monthly base salary based on the best 60 consecutive months of base salary within the last 120 months and (ii) the best five annual incentive awards in the last ten10 years. For years of credited service after December 31, 2008, final average compensation is the average of the five5 highest consecutive calendar years of eligible earnings in the last 10 years. Eligible earnings in a given calendar year is the sum of the base salary and the incentive award paid under an annual incentive plan (excluding any special incentive awards unless authorized by the Company)company). The paid incentive award component is capped at 125% of the target incentive award of each year.

Beginning January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2010, Messrs. Laflamme and PichéVachon were required to contribute to the Abitibi registered plan. Their contributions were equal to 5% of their pensionable earnings up to the U.S. compensation limit ($245,000 in 2009 and 2010). Contributions were credited with interest at the average net rate of return of the pension fund of the Abitibi registered plan over the preceding two calendar years.

Once participants attain age 55, they can retire early. The total pension payable is unreduced if the participant retires at age 58 and the sum of his age and years of service is at least 80. If a participant is notMessrs. Laflamme and Vachon are both eligible for an

unreduced benefit and has completed 20 years of service, the total pension payable is reduced by 6% for each year (or 0.5% for each month) between his retirement date and the date he would have attained age 58 and the sum of his age and years of service would have equaled at least 80 had he continued employment. If the participant has less than 20 years of service, the 6% per year (or 0.5% for each month) reduction is calculated for each year before age 65 that the retirement occurs. A participant who terminates employmentto retire with the Company and its related entities for any reason before attaining age 55 is eligible for an unreduced pension payable at age 65, but may elect to receive a reduced pension at any time before age 65. If his employment was terminated involuntarily, his pension payable is reduced by 6% for each year (or 0.5% for each month) between the date payments commence and the date on or after attainment of age 58 that the sum of his age and years of service would have equaled at least 80 had he continued employment. If his employment was terminated voluntarily, the 6% per year (or 0.5% for each month) reduction is calculated for each year before age 65 that payments commence.benefits.

Time and Form of Payment

The legacy Abitibi Canadian pension plans provide for payment in an annuity with a participant option to select payment among different types of annuities, any of which will provide monthly payments for the life of the participant and his spouse, if any. ForThe company has secured the Canadian executives who are not subject to U.S. tax law, the annuities can generally be securedDB SERP benefits of Messrs. Laflamme and Vachon by a letter of credit pursuant to a retirement compensation arrangement without adverse tax consequences to the executive and the Company has established security protocols. At the executive’s age 55, the Company will undertake to secure the executives’ supplemental retirement benefits by a letter of credit. The Company has secured the Canadian DB SERP benefits of Messrs. Laflamme and Piché.executive.

Assumptions for Pension Benefits Table Value

The accrued benefit amounts identified in the Pension Benefits table above show the present value of the future monthly payments if calculated as a lump sum. An interestA discount rate and mortality table providing for current life expectancies are used to calculate the present value amount as of December 31, 2015.2020. The interestdiscount rate and mortality table used are the same as those used for our financial statements, which are a 4.0% interest2.4% discount rate and the 2014 Private Sector Canadian Pensioner’s Mortality Table including an increasea decrease of the rates of 3.5%5.7%, projected generationally using Scale B, and no assumption for pre-retirement mortality. Benefits were calculated assuming retirement on the date an executive attainsattained age 58 with the sum of his age and years of service equaling at least 80.80 (or current age, if older). In addition, the final average earnings used for the calculation of the accumulated benefit as of December 31, 2015,2020, as shown in the Pension Benefits table, are: for years of service credited through December 31, 2008, Mr. Laflamme, $294,765$320,588 and Mr. Piché, $186,452;Vachon, $393,105; and for years of service credited after December 31, 2008, Mr. Laflamme, $263,831$286,945 and Mr. Piché, $169,885.Vachon, $366,273.

DC Make-Up Program

Following its 2011 termination of its nonqualified, non-registered deferred compensation plan, the Company implemented, in 2012, the DC Make-Up Program to provide Company contributions to eligible employees who are limited by the statutory rules on the amount of compensation that can be taken into account under the registered tax-qualified defined contribution plans. In addition, because the registered tax-qualified plans do not provide contributions on awards payable pursuant to STIPs for Canadian employees, the DC Make-Up Program also provides these contributions. The Company chose to provide these contributions on a current taxable basis instead of a tax-deferred basis. These contributions are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table under All Other Compensation because the contributions are not deferred compensation.

Severance and Change in Control Arrangements

The following is a discussion of the policies and arrangements to which a named executive officer becomes subject upon certain termination events, with or without a change in control of the Company.company. During 2015,2020, all

named executive officers except Mr. GarneauLaflamme, were covered by the Company’scompany’s executive severance policy. Severance protection for Mr. Garneau wasthe chief executive officer of the company is provided under histhe chief executive officer’s individual employment agreement and related documents and, in the case of a termination with a change in control, a separate change in control agreement.

The material termsAs described in the CD&A, effective at 11:59 PM on February 28, 2021, Mr. Laflamme stepped down and retired from the position of thepresident and chief executive officer. Upon his departure, Mr. Laflamme received certain severance policy, the severance provisions of Mr. Garneau’sand other benefits provided under his employment agreement and Mr. Garneau’s changereceived full vesting of his outstanding equity awards and remains eligible for a prorated award under the 2021 STIP. The information, including the footnotes, in control agreement are described below. the “Potential Payments Upon Termination” table below describe the actual payments or value received as a result of his departure.

In all cases, to be eligible for severance benefits, the named executive officers must agree to certain restrictive covenants intended to mitigate the competitive disadvantage that would result from losing executive talent to competitors of the Company:company:

 

The executive severance policy requires eligible executivesnamed executive officers to protect confidential information. In addition, to receive benefits under the executive severance policy, an eligible executive must sign a release containing non-compete, non-solicitation and confidentiality covenants.

 

Mr. Garneau’sThe president and chief executive officer’s employment agreement includes covenants not to compete with the Company,company, solicit customers of the Companycompany or interfere with suppliers of the Companycompany for a 12-month period following a termination for “cause” (as defined in the employment agreement) or a nine-month period following a termination for any other reason, except that these covenants do not apply in the case of a termination without “cause” by the Companycompany or for “good reason” by Mr. Garneauthe president and chief executive officer pursuant to the change in control agreement (as defined thereunder). In addition, a confidentiality covenant is effective for a five-year period following a termination for any reason. The above covenants remain in place following Mr. Laflamme’s departure.

The following table describesexecutive severance policy, in both a change in control or non-change in control context, does not provide any enhanced benefits in the form of, for example, subsidized continued health coverage or tax-gross ups. The terms Cause, Change in Control, Good Reason are defined in the respective severance policy or agreement, as applicable. The material terms of the executive severance policy and the severance provisions of Mr. Garneau’s employment and change in control agreements (withare as follows, with all descriptions qualified by the actual terms of the policy and agreements):policy.

 

Key Provisions

 

Executive Severance Policy

 

Mr. Garneau’s Employment and Change in Control
Agreements

Termination Without Cause (No Change in Control)

Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason
(On or After Change in Control)

Severance pay(1)Pay

 

•  Lump sum payment equal to 6 weeks of eligible pay per year of continuous service, with a minimum of 52 weeks and a maximum of 104 weeks

•  “Eligible pay” is base pay, plus the lesser of (i) average of last 2 incentive awards paid or (ii) 125% of target incentive award for year of termination

•  Pro rata vesting of outstanding equity awards pursuant to the terms of the award agreements

 

•    Same severance pay as under executive severance policy

•    “Eligible pay” is base pay, plusIf the lesser of (i) average of last 2 incentive awards earned or (ii) 125% of target incentive award for year ofeligible termination

•    Pro rata vesting of outstanding equity awards pursuant to the terms of the award agreements

Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason On or After Change in Control
Time period during which change in control benefits are payableEligible termination occurs within 12 months after a change in control,Eligible termination within 24 months after change in control

Key Provisions

Executive Severance Policy

Mr. Garneau’s Employment and Change in Control
Agreements

Severance pay(1)Same severance pay is the same as when there is no change in control

The following amounts, reduced to minimize excise tax liability under Code Section 4999:(2)

•    Lump sum payment equal to:

•    3 times base salary as in effect on his termination date, plus

•    3 times the lesser of (i) average of his last 2 incentive awards earned or (ii) 125% of target incentive award for year of termination, plus

•    3 times maximum Company contributions he could have received under Company’s defined contribution program (if any) for year of termination, plus

•    $14,452 in lieu of individual outplacement services

•    Immediate vesting of outstanding equity awards

•    Eligibility for Company-provided health care and life insurance coverage, with premiums payable at the rates then in effect for executives, until the earlier of 36 months after his termination date or the date he becomes covered under another employer’s health care and life insurance programs

Key Definitions
“Cause”Just cause, determined by the Company in its sole discretion

•    Willful failure to carry out duties under employment agreement, to materially comply with Company’s rules and policies, or to follow board’s reasonable instructions or directives consistent with duties and responsibilities under employment agreement

•    Acting dishonestly or fraudulently in connection with the Company’s business, or willful gross misconduct in the course of employment, in each case resulting in adverse consequences to the Company or its affiliates

•    Personal profiting from a transaction involving the Company or its affiliates without prior written consent of board, or other material breach of fiduciary duties

•    Criminal offense punishable by imprisonment likely to adversely affect the Company or its affiliates or the suitability of Mr. Garneau to perform duties under employment agreement

Potential Payments Upon Termination

Key Provisions

Executive Severance Policy

Mr. Garneau’s Employment and Change in Control
Agreements

•    Material breach of employment agreement

•    Material misconduct detrimental to business or financial position of the Company or its affiliates

•    Serious personal misconduct detrimental injurious to reputation of the Company or its affiliates

•    Habitual inability to carry out functions of employment due to alcohol or drug related causes (with 30 day notice and cure period)

•    Any serious reason pursuant to Article 2094 of the Civil Code of Québec

“Good reason”

•    Material adverse change in status, title, position, duties or responsibilities (including reporting line relationships), or any removal from, or failure to reappoint to, any material office or position

•    Material reduction in aggregate compensation and benefits

•    Material reduction in salary

•    Material change in geographic location at which services are to be performed

•    Material change in status, title, position, duties or responsibilities (including reporting line relationships) that represents substantial adverse change, or any removal from, or failure to reappoint to, any material office or position

•    Material reduction in aggregate compensation and benefits

•    Material reduction in base salary

•    The Company’s failure to obtain from any successor its assent to assume the change in control agreement

•    Material change in geographic location at which services are to be performed

Good reason “notice and cure period”

•    Executive must provide notice within 90 days after initial existence of “good reason” condition

•    Company has 30 days to remedy condition after receiving notice

“Change in control”

•    Acquisition of at least 50% of Company’s voting shares

•    Election or appointment of at least 50% new directors

•    Transaction(s) resulting in a transfer of assets with fair market value (net of existing liabilities transferred) of at least 50% of Company’s market capitalization immediately before the transaction(s)

•    Completion of any transaction or the first of a series of transactions that would have the same or similar effect as any transaction(s) described in the prior three bullets

The table below shows amounts triggered upon the termination events identified below and does not include amounts that are not payable or otherwise forfeited upon a for cause termination or certain non-retirement terminations. In these circumstances, other than legally required amounts such as accrued salary, no additional amounts would be payable and any vested and unvested rights to equity would be forfeited. The following table describes the amounts payable based on Mr. Lalonde’s position as senior vice president and chief financial officer on December 31, 2020, under the executive severance policy.

  Base
Salary
($)(1)
  Avg. of Last
Two STIP
Awards
($)(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(3)
  Equity
Awards
($)(4)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(5)
  Total Post
Termination
Payment &
Benefit Value
($)
 

Yves Laflamme(6)

      

Company initiated (not for cause) termination of employee without a change in control

  1,877,288   1,642,660   2,310,222   8,671,973(8)   —     14,502,142 

Company initiated (not for cause) termination of employee with a change in control or good reason termination by employee following a change in control

  —     —     —     —     —     —  (7) 

Retirement

  —     —     —     —     —     —   

Death

  —     —     —     —     —     —   

Long-Term Disability

  —     —     —     —     —     —   

Remi Lalonde

      

Company initiated (not for cause) termination of employee with or without a change in control or good reason termination by employee following change in control

  529,970   223,321   542,088   259,493(9)   19,648   1,574,520(7) 

Retirement

  —     —     —  (10)   —  (11)   —     —   

  Base
Salary
($)(1)
  Avg. of Last
Two STIP
Awards
($)(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(3)
  Equity
Awards
($)(4)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(5)
  Total Post
Termination
Payment &
Benefit Value
($)
 

Death

  —     —     542,088   1,054,492(12)   —     1,596,580 

Long-Term Disability

  —     —     542,088   1,054,492(12)   —     1,596,580 

John Lafave

      

Company initiated (not for cause) termination of employee with or without a change in control or good reason termination by employee following change in control

  657,051   523,098   400,691   411,600(9)   19,648   2,012,088(7) 

Retirement

  —     —     —  (10)   411,600(11)   —     411,600 

Death

  —     —     400,691   853,834(12)   —     1,254,525 

Long-Term Disability

  —     —     400,691   853,834(12)   —     1,254,525 

Richard Tremblay

      

Company initiated (not for cause) termination of employee with or without a change in control or good reason termination by employee following a change in control

  422,739   336,987   469,213   488,770(9)   5,800   1,723,509(7) 

Retirement

  —     —     —  (10)   488,770(11)   —     488,770 

Death

  —     —     469,213   1,009,633(12)   —     1,478,846 

Long-Term Disability

  —     —     469,213   1,009,633(12)   —     1,478,846 

Jacques Vachon

      

Company initiated (not for cause) termination of employee with or without a change in control or good reason termination by employee following a change in control

  724,167   649,523   487,167   448,087(9)   19,648   2,328,592(7) 

Retirement

  —     —     487,167   1,136,112(11)   —     1,623,279 

Death

  —     —     487,167   932,577(12)   —     1,419,744 

Long-Term Disability

  —     —     487,167   932,577(12)   —     1,419,744 

 

1.For the named executive officers other than Mr. Garneau, vesting of outstanding equity awards is not automatically accelerated. However, the equity incentive plan provides the compensation committee discretion to accelerate the exercisability of outstanding stock options upon a termination with or without a change in control.

2.If the aggregate amount of pay and benefits payable to Mr. Garneau under the change in control agreement would constitute a “parachute payment” subject to excise tax under Section 4999 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, his aggregate pay and benefits would be reduced to the greater of (i) the after-tax amount which he would retain after all federal, state and local income taxes and all excise taxes under Section 4999, or (ii) the after-tax amount which he would retain after all federal, state and local income taxes if his aggregate pay and benefits were reduced to the maximum amount payable without triggering the excise tax liability under Section 4999.

Severance Projection in the Case of Non-Change in Control, Non-Cause Termination

If Ms. Longworth or Messrs. Laflamme, Piché, or Tremblay had been terminated without cause on December 31, 2015, absent a change in control, they would have received the following benefits under the Company’s executive severance policy described above. Amounts shown for Mr. Garneau are pursuant to his employment agreement.

   Richard
Garneau
  Jo-Ann
Longworth
  Yves
Laflamme
  André
Piché
  Richard
Tremblay
 

Base Salary (1—2X)(1)

  $981,099   $417,821   $722,952   $676,142   $364,076  

Avg. of Last Two Annualized Regular Cash Incentive Awards Paid (1—2X)

   465,850(2)   204,419(3)   350,271(3)   219,611(3)   111,988(3) 

All Other Severance Compensation

   657,030(4)   265,365(5)   231,344(5)   213,593(5)   218,708(5) 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   2,103,979    887,605    1,304,567    1,109,346    694,772  

1.Assumes annual base salaries

Except for Mr. Garneau, Ms. Longworth and Messrs. Laflamme, Piché and Tremblay of $981,099, $417,821, $361,476, $338,071 and $364,076, respectively (expressedbase salary amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars based on a ratio of 52%68.9% payable in U.S.Canadian dollars and 48%31.1% payable in CanadianU.S. dollars, as described in footnote (1)1 to the Summary Compensation Table, with theTable. The portion payable in Canadian dollars was converted to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate as of December 31, 2015,2020, or $0.7226).$0.7859. Mr. Laflamme receives his base salary in U.S. dollars. The amounts shown for Mr. Laflamme is two times his base salary. The amounts shown for Messrs. Lalonde, Lafave, Tremblay and Vachon are based on their years of service and the minimum and maximum amounts payable under the policy. Specifically, Messrs. Lalonde, Lafave, Tremblay and Vachon would respectively receive 1.32, 2, 1.10 and 2 times their base salary.

 

2.Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Garneau’s severance pay is based on the average of his last two short term incentive awards earned, rather than paid. He earned awards under the 2014 and 2015 STIPs.

3.For disclosure purposes, cash incentive award calculations

The amounts shown for Ms. Longworth and Messrs. Laflamme, PichéLalonde, Lafave, Tremblay and TremblayVachon are based on the average of their 20132018 and 20142019 regular incentive awards paid.paid, expressed in U.S. dollars and using the same multiples as described in footnote 1.

 

3.

For Mr. Laflamme, this value represents the 2020 STIP payout and the settlement of his previously granted, disclosed and outstanding cash-settled RSUs upon his departure from the company on February 28, 2021. For clarification, while the earned 2020 STIP is also disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table, Mr. Laflamme only received one payout for the 2020 STIP.

4.Assumes (i) payment of a 2015 STIP award of $484,522, (ii) outplacement counseling services with a

For Mr. Laflamme, the value of $14,452, (iii) one month of additionalpro rata vesting of the 66,031 outstanding options under Mr. Garneau’s 2013 annual equity award, with no value realizedRSUs and PSUs is based on the spread between the per-share closing trading price on the NYSE of shares of the Company’scompany’s common stock on the date of his termination, February 28, 2021, or $9.32. For all other named executive officers, the value of RSUs and PSUs is based on the per-share closing trading price on the NYSE of shares of the company’s common stock on December 31, 2015,2020, or $7.57, and$6.54. There is no value realized on any outstanding options a named executive officer may hold because the December 31, 2020 closing price is less than the applicable exercise price (i.e., $15.66 forprice.For the 2013 annual option award), (iv) one month of additionalpro rata vesting of2017 PSUs, the 224,761 outstanding RSUs granted to him pursuant his 2013, 2014 and 2015 annual equity awards, with a combined fair market value of $35,447 and (v) two months of additionalpro rata vesting of the 207,050 outstanding PSUs granted pursuant his 2014 and 2015 annual equity awards, with a fair market value of $122,609is based on the actual payout percentage for corporate measures under the 20152018, 2019 and 2020 STIP before application of the aggregate 7% or 5% limit of free cash flow.flow, as applicable. For the 2018, 2019 and 2020 PSUs, the value assumes that the PSUs would be paid at 100% or target on December 31, 2020, with actual payout being subject to achievement of the established performance measures.

 

5.Assumes (i) payment of a 2015 STIP award (including any adjustment described

Except for Mr. Laflamme, amounts in this column represent the CD&A and the Summary Compensation Table), (ii) outplacement counseling services with a value of $14,452 for Ms. Longworth and Messrs. Laflamme and Piché and $5,800 for Mr. Tremblay, and (iii) immediate vesting of apro rata portion of stock options, RSUs and PSUs. The number and value of options, RSUs and PSUs that would vest upon termination is as follows:

outplacement benefits.

Ms. Longworth: a 2015 STIP award of $206,344; 1,750 options, with no value realized; 1,894 RSUs, with a fair market value of $14,338; 6,856 PSUs, with a fair market value of $30,232.

Mr. Laflamme: a 2015 STIP award of $178,517; 1,521 options, with no value realized; 1,639 RSUs, with a fair market value of $12,407; 5,889 PSUs, with a fair market value of $25,968.

Mr. Piché: a 2015 STIP award of $166,958; 628 options, with no value realized; 1,135 RSUs, with a fair market value of $8,592; 5,350 PSUs, with a fair market value of $23,591.

Mr. Tremblay: a 2015 STIP award of $179,801; 654 options, with no value realized; 1,193 RSUs, with a fair market value of $9,031; 5,460 PSUs, with a fair market value of $24,076.

The table reflects one month of additional pro rata vesting of options and RSUs under the 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 annual equity awards, as applicable, and two months of additional pro rata vesting of PSUs under the 2014 and 2015 annual equity awards. The value of options, RSUs and PSUs is based on the per-share closing trading price on the NYSE of shares of the Company’s common stock on December 31, 2015, or $7.57. There is no value realized on any of the options because the December 31, 2015 closing price is less than the applicable exercise price (i.e., $16.45, $11.41 and $15.66 for the 2011, 2012 and 2013 annual option awards, respectively). For PSUs, the value is also based on the actual payout percentage for corporate measures under the 2015 STIP before application of the aggregate 7% limit of free cash flow.

Severance Projection in the Case of Non-Cause or Good Reason Termination Following a Change in Control

If Ms. Longworth or Messrs. Laflamme, Piché or Tremblay had terminated employment for good reason on December 31, 2015, within 12 months following a change in control, they would have received the following amounts under the Company’s executive severance policy described above. Notably, for everyone except Mr. Garneau, the amounts payable upon an eligible termination following a change in control is the same as the amount payable upon an involuntary termination without cause absent a change in control. If Mr. Garneau’s employment had terminated without cause or for good reason on December 31, 2015, within 24 months following a change in control, he would have received the amounts shown pursuant to his change in control agreement.

   Richard 
Garneau
  Jo-Ann 
Longworth
  Yves
Laflamme
  André
Piché
  Richard
Tremblay
 

Base Salary(1)

  $2,943,297   $417,821   $722,952   $676,142   $364,076  

Avg. of Last Two Annualized Regular Cash Incentive Awards Paid

   1,397,551(2)   204,419    350,271    219,611    111,988  

Welfare Payment

   15,243    —      —      —     —    

2015 STIP Award

   484,522    206,344    178,517    166,958    179,801  

3X Company Contributions under Defined Contribution Program for 2015

   399,910    —      —      —     —    

Outplacement

   14,452    14,452    14,452    14,452    5,800  

Value of Equity Awards

   2,614,433(3)  44,569(4)  38,375(4)  32,183(4)   33,107(4)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   7,869,408(5)   887,605(6)   1,304,567(6)   1,109,346(6)   694,772(7) 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

1.Assumes annual base salaries for Mr. Garneau, Ms. Longworth and Messrs. Laflamme, Piché and Tremblay of $981,099, $417,821, $361,476, $338,071 and $364,076, respectively (expressed in U.S. dollars based on a ratio of 52% payable in U.S. dollars and 48% payable in Canadian dollars, as described in footnote (1) to the Summary Compensation Table, with the portion payable in Canadian dollars converted to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate as of December 31, 2015, or $0.7226).

2.Pursuant to his change in control agreement, Mr. Garneau’s severance pay is based on the average of his last two short term incentive awards earned, rather than paid. He earned awards under the 2014 and 2015 STIPs.

3.

Assumes immediate vesting of the 66,031 outstanding options under Mr. Garneau’s 2013 annual equity award, with no value realized on the spread between the per-share closing trading price on the NYSE of shares of the Company’s common stock on December 31, 2015, or $7.57, and the applicable exercise price (i.e., $15.66 for the 2013 annual option award), (iv) immediate vesting of the 224,761 outstanding RSUs granted to him pursuant his 2013, 2014 and 2015 annual equity awards, with a combined fair market value of $1,701,441 and (v) immediate vesting of the 207,050 outstanding PSUs granted pursuant his 2014 and

2015 annual equity awards, with a fair market value of $912,992 based on the actual payout percentage for corporate measures under the 2015 STIP before application of the aggregate 7% limit of free cash flow.

4.Assumes immediate vesting of apro rata portion of stock options, RSUs and PSUs. The number and value of options, RSUs and PSUs that would vest upon termination is as follows:

Ms. Longworth: 1,750 options, with no value realized; 1,894 RSUs, with a fair market value of $14,338; 6,856 PSUs, with a fair market value of $30,232.

Mr. Laflamme: 1,521 options, with no value realized; 1,639 RSUs, with a fair market value of $12,407; 5,889 PSUs, with a fair market value of $25,968.

Mr. Piché: 628 options, with no value realized; 1,135 RSUs, with a fair market value of $8,592; 5,350 PSUs, with a fair market value of $23,591.

Mr. Tremblay: 654 options, with no value realized; 1,193 RSUs, with a fair market value of $9,031; 5,460 PSUs, with a fair market value of $24,076.

The table reflects one month of additionalpro rata vesting of options and RSUs under the 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 annual equity awards, as applicable, and two months of additionalpro rata vesting of PSUs under the 2014 and 2015 annual equity awards. The value of options, RSUs and PSUs is based on the per-share closing trading price on the NYSE of shares of the Company’s common stock on December 31, 2015, or $7.57. There is no value realized on any of the options because the December 31, 2015 closing price is less than the applicable exercise price (i.e., $16.45, $11.41 and $15.66 for the 2011, 2012 and 2013 annual option awards, respectively). For PSUs, the value is also based on the actual payout percentage for corporate measures under the 2015 STIP before application of the aggregate 7% limit of free cash flow.

5.Pursuant to his change in control agreement, Mr. Garneau’s severance payment would have been subject to excise tax under Section 4999. Mr. Garneau would have been responsible for payment of the excise tax (and all federal, state and local taxes) on his severance payment and would not have been entitled to a gross-up payment. Consequently, the total number shown does not reflect the estimated amount of the excise tax.

 

6.

As described in the CD&A, Mr. Laflamme stepped down and retired from the company on February 28, 2021. As permitted by SEC guidance, the amounts shown are the actual amounts or value Mr. Laflamme received upon his termination from his position as president and chief executive officer.

7.

To the extent Ms. Longworth or Messrs. Laflamme or PichéLalonde and Vachon were subject to U.S. taxation in 2015,2020, they couldwould have been subject to the change in control excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code. In no eventAs a result, if an eligible termination would they have been entitledoccurred following a change in control, Messrs. Lalonde and Vachon would be subject to an approximate excise tax of $1,977 and $11,705, respectively.

To the extent Mr. Lafave was subject to U.S. taxation in 2020, he would not have been subject to the change in control excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code. Mr. Tremblay, who was subject to U.S. taxation similarly would not have been subject to the change in control excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code. In no event would they have been entitled to gross-up payments in respect of such tax pursuant to the executive severance policy or their individual award agreements.

8.

As described above in “Severance and Change in Control Arrangements”, the value represents immediate vesting and settlement of 403,068 RSUs that were outstanding RSUs upon his departure on February 28, 2021. It also includes the value of 527,401 PSUs of which 489,312 PSUs remain unsettled and will settle at the same time as they will settle for active employees based on actual performance measures in accordance with the retirement provisions of the respective award agreements. For clarity, the value of these unsettled PSUs is already included in the amount of $8,671,973 indicated in the table above, using the per-share price of February 28, 2021 of $9.32 at 100% payout.

 

7.9.

Except for Mr. Laflamme, assumes one month of pro rata vesting of pending RSUs awards and pro rata vesting of pending PSUs awards. The number of RSUs and PSUs that would vest upon a termination without cause is as follows:

   Mr. Lalonde   Mr. Lafave   Mr. Tremblay   Mr. Vachon 

RSUs

   4,967    2,895    3,414    3,168 

PSUs

   34,711    60,041    71,321    65,347 

10.

Messrs. Lalonde, Lafave and Tremblay was subject to U.S. taxation in 2015did not meet the criteria for retirement under the STIP as of December 31, 2020. As a result, no STIP would be payable for a retirement on December 31, 2020.

11.

For Mr. Vachon, assumes continued vesting of RSUs and consequently, could have been subject toPSUs under the change in control excise tax under Section 49992017, 2018 and 2019 equity awards and pro rata vesting of the Code. In no event2020 annual equity awards because he met the criteria for retirement under the LTIP. For Messrs. Lafave and Tremblay, the amount reflects one month of pro rata vesting of each RSU award and PSU award granted to them because they had attained age 55 but did not meet the criteria for retirement under the LTIP. The number of RSUs and PSUs that would he have been entitled to gross-up payments in respectvest upon retirement is as follows:

   Mr. Lalonde   Mr. Lafave   Mr. Tremblay   Mr. Vachon 

RSUs

   —      2,895    3,414    61,330 

PSUs

   —      60,041    71,321    112,387 

Mr. Lalonde would not have been entitled to any equity awards as of December 31, 2020, because he has not attained age 55.

12.

For all named executive officers except Mr. Laflamme, assumes immediate vesting of such tax pursuant to the executive severance policynext tranche of RSUs under the 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 annual equity awards, and pro rata vesting of PSUs under the 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 annual equity awards. The number of RSUs and PSUs that would vest upon death or his individual award agreements.disability is as follows:

   Mr. Lalonde   Mr. Lafave   Mr. Tremblay   Mr. Vachon 

RSUs

   59,609    34,737    40,970    38,010 

PSUs

   101,629    95,819    113,409    104,586 

CEO PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

For 2020, as required under Instruction 2 to Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we have updated the median employee used to calculate the CEO pay ratio. To identify the median employee, we measured our employee population as of October 1, 2020, which consisted of approximately 6,899 individuals, split between Canada and the U.S. We have excluded all employees in all other countries as permitted by the SEC rules under the de minimis rule since such employees represent less than 5% of our total employees. The excluded population comprised of 3 employees from the United Kingdom.

The compensation definition used to determine our median employee was cash compensation — this included base pay, cash incentives, overtime and cash perquisites. For most employees, we used 2019 cash compensation as reported on 2019 income tax slips. For employees hired in 2019, but before April 1, 2019, we annualized their 2019 cash compensation. For all other employees, we annualized their 2020 year-to-date cash compensation.

To find the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees (other than our CEO), we used a commonly accepted random sampling methodology on our employee population. We conducted our analysis using a sample of 377 employees (95% confidence interval and ±5% precision).

Using this methodology, we identified our median employee and calculated the elements of the employee’s annual total compensation for fiscal 2020 in accordance with the requirements to be in the amount of $92,625. With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of our 2020 Summary Compensation Table — $4,555,204. The ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees is therefore 49 to 1.

INFORMATION OONN STOCK OWNERSHIP

The following table includes all stock-based holdings, as of April 8, 2016,March 23, 2021, of: each of our directors and named executive officers; our directors and executive officers as a group; and all those known by us to be beneficial owners of more than five percent of our common stock.

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Holder

Number of Shares
of Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned
Percent  of
Class(1)

Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited

        95 Wellington Street West, Suite 800

        Toronto, Ontario M5J 2N7

        Canada

28,238,139(2)31.6

Donald Smith & Co., Inc.

        152 West 57th Street

        New York, New York 10019

8,685,617(3)9.7

Chou Associates Management Inc.

        110 Sheppard Avenue, Suite 301, Box 18

        Toronto, Ontario M2N 6Y8

        Canada

6,931,881(4)7.7

Steelhead Partners, LLC

        333 108th Avenue NE, Suite 2010

        Bellevue, Washington 98004

6,461,759(5)7.2

Alpine Investment Management, LLC

        8000 Maryland Avenue, Suite 700

        Saint Louis, Missouri 63105

4,563,608(6)5.1
Michel P. Desbiens15,286(7)*
Jennifer C. Dolan15,286(7)*
Richard D. Falconer34,812(8)*
Richard Garneau99,028(9)*
Jeffrey A. Hearn34,812(8)*
Yves Laflamme56,333(10)*
Jo-Ann Longworth102,442(11)*
Bradley P. Martin21,200(12)*
André Piché47,218(13)*
Alain Rhéaume34,812(8)*
Michael S. Rousseau34,812(8)*
Richard Tremblay44,066(14)*
David H. Wilkins34,812(8)*
Directors (including nominees) and executive officers as a group (15 persons)722,589*

Name and Address of Beneficial Holder                            

  Number of Shares
of Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned
  Percent of
Class(1)
 

Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited

95 Wellington Street West, Suite 800

Toronto, Ontario M5J 2N7

Canada

   30,548,190(2)   38.3

Chou Associates Management Inc.

110 Sheppard Avenue, Suite 301, Box 18

Toronto, Ontario M2N 6Y8

Canada

   5,256,960(3)   6.6

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP

Building One

6300 Bee Cave Road

Austin, Texas 78746

   4,434,914(4)   5.6

Alpine Investment Management, LLC

8000 Maryland Avenue, Suite 700

Saint Louis, Missouri 63105

   4,213,538(5)   5.3
Randall C. Benson   34,364(6)   * 
Suzanne Blanchet     (7)   —   
Jennifer C. Dolan   50,039(8)   * 
Yves Laflamme   398,086(9)   * 
John Lafave   133,355(10)   * 
Remi Lalonde   64,166(11)   * 
Bradley P. Martin   59,999(12)   * 
Alain Rhéaume   65,067(13)   * 
Michael S. Rousseau   85,067(14)   * 
Richard Tremblay   160,512(15)   * 
Jacques Vachon   101,692(16)   * 

Directors (including nominees) and executive

        officers as a group (14 persons)

    1.6% 

 

*

Less than 1%

 

1.

Based on 89,513,33479,830,748 shares of outstanding common stock as of April 8, 2016.March 23, 2021. For purposes of this table, “beneficial ownership” is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, pursuant to which a person or group of persons is deemed to have beneficial ownership of the shares of common stock that the person has the right to acquire within 60 days of the date of determination, as well as the shares of common stock underlying vested stock-settled RSUs or DSUs and vested options. For purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding shares of common stock held by each person or group of persons

named above, all the shares the person or persons has (have) the right to acquire within 60 days, as well as the shares of common stock underlying vested stock-settled RSUs or DSUs and vested options, are deemed to be outstanding but are deemed not to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. All numbers listed represent sole investment and voting power unless otherwise indicated.

 

2.

Based on an amended Schedule 13D filed on December 22, 2015,2016, by V. Prem Watsa, 1109519 Ontario Limited, The Sixty Two Investment Company Limited, 810679 Ontario Limited, Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited, FFHL Group Ltd., Fairfax (Barbados) International Corp., Wentworth Insurance Company Ltd., TIG Insurance (Barbados) Limited, Fairfax (US) Inc., Clearwater Insurance Company,

Zenith National Insurance Corp., Zenith Insurance Company, TIG Holdings, Inc., TIG Insurance Company, Odyssey US Holdings Inc., Odyssey Re Holdings Corp., Odyssey Reinsurance Company, Hudson Insurance Company, Hudson Specialty Insurance Company, Newline Holdings UK Limited, Newline Corporate Name Limited, Crum & Forster Holdings Corp., The North River Insurance Company, United States Fire Insurance Company, RiverStone Holdings Limited, RiverStone Insurance Limited, RiverStone Insurance (UK) Limited, CRC Reinsurance Limited,, Northbridge Share Option 1 Corp., Northbridge Financial Corporation, Northbridge Commercial Insurance Corporation, Northbridge General Insurance Corporation, Northbridge Personal Insurance Corporation, Federated Insurance Company of Canada, Brit Limited, Brit Insurance Holdings Limited, Brit Insurance (Gibraltar) PCC Limited, and Brit Syndicates Limited.

 

3.

Based on a Schedule 13G filed on April 10, 2020, by Chou Associates Management Inc. and Stonetrust Commercial Insurance Co. Chou Associates Management Inc. reports beneficially owning 4,571,960 shares and Stonetrust Commercial Insurance Co reports beneficially owning 685,000 shares, and both having in aggregate sole dispositive power to vote and to dispose over 5,256,960 shares.

4.

Based on a Schedule 13G filed on February 10, 2016,12, 2021, by Donald Smith & Co., Inc. and Donald Smith Long/Short EquitiesDimensional Fund L.P.  Donald Smith & Co., Inc.Advisors LP. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP reports having sole voting power over 6,685,6174,255,942 shares and Donald Smith Long/Short Equities Fund, L.P. reports having sole voting power over 34,081 shares, and both report having sole dispositive power over 8,685,6174,434,914 shares.

4.Based on a Schedule 13G filed on February 10, 2016, All 4,434,914 shares are owned by Chou Associates Management Inc., Francis S.M. Chou, Chou Associatescommingled funds, group trusts and separate accounts (“Funds”) for which Dimensional Fund Chou Asia Fund, Chou Bond Fund, Chou RRSP Fund, Chou America Management Inc., Chou Opportunity Fund and Chou Income Fund.Advisors LP serves as investment manager or sub-adviser to the Funds.

 

5.

Based on an amended Schedule 13G filed on February 12, 2016,January 28, 2021, by Steelhead Partners,ACR Alpine Capital Research, LLC, James Michael Johnston, Brian Katz Klein and Steelhead Navigator Master, L.P.  James Michael Johnston and Brian Katz Klein report having shared voting and investment power over the shares they may be deemed to beneficially own.

6.Based on a Schedule 13G filed on February 8, 2016, by Alpine Investment Management, LLC, Alpine Partners Management,Private Capital, LLC, MQR, L.P., ACR Multi-Strategy Quality Return (MQR) Fund, and Nicholas V. Tompras. ACR Alpine Capital Research, LLC, Alpine Investment Management, LLC, and Nicholas V. Tompras each report having shared voting and shared dispositive power over 4,563,608 shares,4,213,538 shares; Alpine Partners Management,Private Capital, LLC and MQR, L.P. each reportreported having shared voting and shared dispositive power over 84,000 shares,790,266 shares; and ACR Multi-Strategy Quality Return (MQR) Fund reportsreported having shared voting and shared dispositive power over 69,76848,000 shares.

6.

Includes 24,800 shares of common stock acquired in open market purchases and held indirectly through R&J Benson Investments Ltd. and 9,564 vested DSUs.

 

7.Includes 15,286 vested RSUs or DSUs, as

Ms. Blanchet joined the case may be.board on January 31, 2019, and only received cash-settled DSUs.

 

8.

Includes 9,3026,252 shares of common stock acquired in open market purchases.

9.

Includes 50,480 shares of common stock that can be acquired by exercising vested stock options, 188,213 vested RSUs and 17,785 vested PSUs. Information is as of February 28, 2021, the date Mr. Laflamme ceased to be chief executive officer and director of the company.

10.

Includes 49,922 shares of common stock that can be acquired by exercising vested stock options and 25,51017,368 vested RSUs or DSUs, as the case may be.RSUs.

 

9.11.

Includes 75,33313,245 shares of common stock acquired in open market purchases and 15,278 shares of common stock that can be acquired by exercising stock options.

12.

Represents 59,999 vested DSUs.

13.

Represents 65,067 vested DSUs.

14.

Represents 65,067 vested DSUs and 20,000 shares of common stock acquired in open market purchases.

15.

Includes 42,855 shares of common stock that can be acquired by exercising vested stock options and 23,69521,036 vested RSUs.RSUs

 

10.16.

Includes 48,69385,322 shares of common stock that can be acquired by exercising vested stock options and 7,640 vested RSUs.options.

11.Includes 80,267 shares of common stock that can be acquired by exercising vested stock options and 22,175 vested RSUs.

12.Represents vested DSUs.

13.Includes 38,889 shares of common stock that can be acquired by exercising vested stock options and 8,329 vested RSUs.

14.Includes 31,654 shares of common stock that can be acquired by exercising vested stock options and 12,412 vested RSUs.

MANAGEMENT PROPOSALS

Item 1 — Vote on the Election of Directors

Composition of the Board

The board fixed the board size at nineseven members; eachsix of the nineseven current members of the board isare standing for reelection to hold office until the 20172022 annual meeting of stockholders.stockholders; Remi G. Lalonde was appointed director by the board as of March 1, 2021, and is standing for election for the first time. Each director nominee has been recommended for election by the human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee and approved and nominated for election by the board. Each director will hold office until his or her successor has been elected and qualified or until the director’s earlier resignation or removal. Each director nominee has consented to serve if elected. Should any director nominee be unable to stand for election at the annual meeting, proxies will be voted in favor of such other person, if any, recommended by the human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee and designated by the board.

Pursuant to our by-laws, as amended in December 2014, if any director nominee fails to receive a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election of directors, such as the 20162021 annual meeting, suchthat director must promptly tender his or her resignation to the board. The human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee will make a recommendation to the full board whether or not to accept suchthe resignation. The board will publicly announce its decision regarding a tendered resignation within 90 days from the date the results of the election are certified.

Board Recommendation

The board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the election to the board of each of Michel P. Desbiens,Randall C. Benson, Suzanne Blanchet, Jennifer C. Dolan, Richard D. Falconer, Richard Garneau, Jeffrey A. Hearn,Remi G. Lalonde, Bradley P. Martin, Alain Rhéaume and Michael S. Rousseau and David H. Wilkins.Rousseau. What follows is biographical and attendance information for each nominee and the qualifications considered in nominating each of them to the board.

Nominees

 

Michel P. DesbiensLOGO

Randall C. Benson

Age: 7661

Director since: 20132017

Board attendance: 100%

Total attendance: 100%

  

Current

Committee(s):

•  Human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee

•  Finance (chair)

•  Environment, Health and Safety

Attendance 5/5

Attendance 4/4

Attendance 4/4

Mr. DesbiensBenson has served on the Company’scompany’s board since the 20132017 annual meeting of stockholders.

 

He has been an independent consultantthe principal of R.C. Benson Consulting Inc. since 2000, advising a number1999, providing strategic analysis, management, financial and operational restructuring and recapitalization expertise to companies, including those considered distressed or underperforming. From May 2012 to August 2016, Mr. Benson was also Co-Lead of clientsthe National Restructuring practice (Canada) at KPMG LLP. In addition, Mr. Benson has experience in finance, operations, sales, and general management gained through various roles he has held in operating companies, including as the forest products industry, during which time he served briefly as Quebecor World Inc.’s chief executive officer (international) and chief executive officer for part of 2002 and 2003. He had been president and chief executivefinancial officer of Donohuepublic and private companies Call-Net Enterprises Inc. since 1994 when it(which owned Sprint Canada Inc.) and Beatrice Foods Inc., and as divisional president of Parmalat Canada’s Dairy Group.

Mr. Benson was acquired by Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. (a predecessor entitychair of ours) in 2000, after which he served briefly as its chairmanthe board and a special advisor. Before then, he held a numberchair of executive positions with Donohue Inc., Domtar Inc., Chapelle d’Arblay paper mill and Abitibi-Price Inc. (a predecessor entitythe audit committee of ours). Mr. DesbiensAdvanz Pharma Corp (TSX) until December 31, 2019. He is a mechanical engineer.

Mr. Desbiens presentlymember of the advisory board of the Canadian Deposit Insurance Corporation and serves on the board of Rogers Sugar Inc. (Toronto Stock Exchange, also referred to as the “TSX”), and in the last five years has served on the boards of Cascades Inc. (TSX), Catalyst Paper Corp. (TSX) and Fibrek Inc., a subsidiary (previously on the TSX).other private companies.

 

Director qualifications:

 

•  Management/operating experience — experienced director and executive officer with,for various public and advisor to, a number of large publicly-held forest products industryprivate companies

 

•  Professional services & financial/accounting experience — experienced executive and special advisor in connection with mergers and acquisitions, financings, and operational and financial restructurings

LOGO

Suzanne Blanchet

Age: 63

Director since 2019

Board attendance: 100%

Total attendance: 100%

Current

Committee(s):

•  Audit

•  Finance

•  Environment, Health and Safety (chair)

Attendance 8/8

Attendance 4/4

Attendance 4/4

Ms. Blanchet was appointed to the company’s board on January 31, 2019, in accordance with the company’s by-laws and further elected at the 2019 annual meeting of shareholders.

She spent over 30 years with Cascades Inc., including as senior vice president, corporate development, from 2014 to 2017. From 1997 to 2014, she was president and chief executive officer of Cascades Tissue Group.

Ms. Blanchet is a graduate of the Directors Education Program of the Institute of Corporate Directors and currently serves as a director of GDI Integrated Facility Services Inc. (TSX) where she serves on the audit committee. Ms. Blanchet has also previously served as a director of Rona Inc. (TSX) and Agropur.

Director qualifications:

•  Management/operating experience — experienced director and executive of a large tissue and paper company

•  Financial/accounting experience — experienced executive and member of audit committees for various public and private companies

LOGO

Jennifer C. Dolan

Age: 6974

Director since: 2013

Board attendance: 100%

Total attendance: 100%

Current Committee(s):

•  Audit

•  Human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee

•  Environment, Health and Safety

Attendance 8/8

Attendance 5/5

Attendance 4/4

  

Ms. Dolan has served on the Company’scompany’s board since the 2013 annual meeting of stockholders.

 

She retired from The New York Times Company in 2012 after a 33-year career, the last ten of which she spent as vice president of forest products, where she managed paper procurement and oversaw its equity investments in two paper mills, including as a member of the board of Donohue Malbaie Inc., while it was a joint venture with the Company.company. Before then, she held a number of executive and senior finance roles. Ms. Dolan is a certified public accountant, and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. She serves on no other public company board.

 

Director qualifications:

 

•  Management/operating experience — experienced executive, representing one of the largest consumers of newsprint in North America

 

•  Professional services & financial/accounting experience — certified public accountant

Richard D. FalconerLOGO

Remi G. Lalonde

Age: 7144

Director since: 20102021

  

Mr. Falconer has servedLalonde was appointed president and chief executive officer and a member of the company’s board on the Company’s board since we emerged from creditor protection on December 9, 2010, which we refer to as the “emergence date.”March 1, 2021.

 

Mr. Lalonde has been with the company since 2009. He previously served as senior vice president and chief financial officer from November 2018 to March 1, 2021, after being vice president for strategy, M&A, business development and procurement from May 2018 to November 2018. He was general manager of Resolute’s pulp and paper mill in Thunder Bay (Ontario) from February 2016 to May 2018. Before taking a leadership role in operations, Mr. Lalonde was treasurer and vice chairmanpresident for investor relations from November 2014 to February 2016, and managing director of CIBC World Markets Inc. until he retiredvice president for investor relations from September 2011 to November 2014. He initially joined the company in 2011. He joined Wood Gundy (now2009 as senior legal counsel (securities) following six years at a division of CIBC World Markets Inc.) in 1970; his previous roles include financial analyst, director of research and co-head of investment banking. He has experience advising companies in the forest products industry.Wall Street law firm.

 

Mr. Falconer serves asLalonde graduated with a board memberbachelor of Chorus Aviation Inc. (TSX)laws from the University of Ottawa in 2003 and a bachelor of applied sciences in civil engineering from the University of Ottawa in 1999. He is chairman of Jaguar Mining Inc. (TSX Venture Exchange). Jaguar Mining filed for creditor protection under theCompanies’ Creditors Arrangement Act(Canada)admitted to practice law in December of 2013New York and emerged from creditor protection on April 22, 2014. Mr. Falconer is a board member for a number of not-for-profit organizations. Mr. Falconer is a Senior Partner at Verus Partners & Co.Ontario.

 

Director qualifications:

 

•  Professional services & financialFinancial/accounting experience — senior position in Canadian investment banking industry

•     Management/operating experience — former vice chairman and managing director of a large Canadian investment banking firm

Richard Garneau

Age: 68

Director since: 2010

Mr. Garneau has served on the board since June 2010 and has been our president and chief executive officer since January 1, 2011.

He served as president and chief executivefinancial officer of Catalyst Paper Corporation from 2007 through 2010 and as vice president of pulp and paper operations with Domtar Inc. from 2005 through 2007. Catalyst Paper filed for creditor protection under theCompanies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) and Chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in January of 2012. He also held a variety of roles at Norampac, Copernic.com, Future Electronics, St. Laurent Paperboard, Finlay Forest Industries and Donohue Inc.

He serves on no other public company board of directors.

Director qualifications:

 

•  Management/operating experience — experienced chief executive officer and senior executive officer with large publicly-held forest products industry companiesgeneral manager of an important pulp and paper mill of the company

 

•  Professional services & financial/accounting experience — chartered professional accountantlawyer

Jeffrey A. Hearn

Age: 64

Director since: 2010

Mr. Hearn has served on the Company’s board since the emergence date.

He retired from International Paper in April 2009, where he served as project executive with responsibility for implementing the company’s expanded manufacturing and market presence in Brazil. Before this assignment, Mr. Hearn held various other general business management, operations management and technology management positions in the U.S. and Canada, including as head of International Paper’s coated paperboard business. He was president and chief executive officer of Weldwood of Canada from 2000 to 2002, and has also served as chair of the Paperboard Mfg. and Converting Section of the American Forest Products Association and former vice-chair of the Forest Products Association of Canada. He was also Industry CEO representative for the B.C. Forest Products Forest Practices Reform Initiative.

He serves on no other public company board of directors.

Director qualifications:

•     Management/operating experience — experienced executive officer with large publicly-held forest products industry companies

•     Politics/government relations — experienced executive officer with trade associations in the forest productions industry

Alain Rhéaume

Age: 64

Director since: 2010

Mr. Rhéaume has served on the Company’s board since the emergence date.

He is founder and a managing partner at Trio Capital Inc. Before then he was executive vice president and president of Fido, a subsidiary of Rogers Wireless Communications Inc., a role he assumed when Microcell Telecommunications Inc. was acquired by Rogers. Mr. Rhéaume was president and chief operating officer and previously served as chief financial officer of Microcell. Previously, Mr. Rhéaume was associate deputy minister of finance from 1987 to 1992 and deputy minister of finance from 1992 to 1996 in the provincial government of Québec.

He currently serves as a director of SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. (TSX), the Canadian Investors Protection Fund and Boralex Inc. (TSX). He has served in the last five years on the boards of the Canadian Public Accountability Board, Redline Communications Group Inc. (TSX), Diagnocure Inc. (TSX), Kangaroo Media Inc. (TSX Venture Exchange; no longer a public company), Boralex Power Income Fund (TSX) and other private companies.

Director qualifications:

•     Politics/government relations and financial/accounting experience — various senior finance positions with the government of the province of Quebec and chief financial officer of a publicly traded company

•     Management/operating experience — several senior executive positions in thehi-tech industry

LOGO

Bradley P. Martin

Age: 5661

Director since: 2012

Chair

Board attendance: 100%

Total attendance: 100%

Current

Committee(s):

•  Finance

•  Environment, Health and Safety

Attendance 4/4

Attendance 4/4

  

Mr. Martin has served on the board since the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders.

 

Since March 9, 2012, he has served as vice president for strategic investments with Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited. He had been its vice president and chief operating officer since January 2007, and its corporate secretary since 2002. Before joining Fairfax in 1998, he was a partner with Torys LLP, a leading Canadian business law firm, specializing in mergers and acquisitions and securities law.

 

Mr. Martin currently serves as a member of the boards of Bank of Ireland (NYSE, London Stock Exchange) and Eurobank Ergasias S.A. (Athens Stock Exchange)., AGT Food and Ingredients Inc. (TSX; no longer a public company) and two private companies. He has served in the last five years on the boardsboard of Ridley Inc. (TSX), Imvescor Restaurant Group Inc. (TSX) and The Brick Ltd. (TSX)Bank of Ireland (London Stock Exchange).

 

Director qualifications:

 

•  Professional services & financial experience — former chief operating officer of a Canadian financial services company; former partner with a Toronto-based law firm

 

•  Management/operating experience — experienced executive officer with large publicly-traded company

LOGO

Alain Rhéaume

Age: 69

Director since: 2010

Lead Director

Board attendance:100%

Total attendance: 96%

Current Committee(s):

•  Audit

•  Human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee (chair)

•  Finance

Attendance 7/8

Attendance 5/5

Attendance 4/4

Mr. Rhéaume has served on the company’s board since the emergence date.

He is founder and a managing partner at Trio Capital Inc. Until 2005, he was executive vice president and president of Fido, a subsidiary of Rogers Wireless Communications Inc. Previously, Mr. Rhéaume was president and chief operating officer and chief financial officer of Microcell. Previously, Mr. Rhéaume was associate deputy minister of finance from 1987 to 1992 and deputy minister of finance from 1992 to 1996 in the provincial government of Québec.

He currently serves as a director of Boralex Inc. (TSX) and was a director of SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. (TSX) until May 2020. He has served in the last five years on the board of the Canadian Investors Protection Fund and other private companies.

Director qualifications:

•  Politics/government relations and financial/accounting experience — various senior finance positions with the government of the province of Québec and chief financial officer of a publicly traded company

•  Management/operating experience — several senior executive positions in the hi-tech industry

LOGO

Michael S. Rousseau

Age: 5863

Director since: 2010

Board attendance: 100%

Total attendance: 96%

Current Committee(s):

•  Audit (chair)

•  Finance

•  Human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee

Attendance 7/8

Attendance 4/4

Attendance 5/5

  

Mr. Rousseau has served on the Company’scompany’s board since the emergence date.

 

He has beenis president and chief executive officer of Air Canada since February 16, 2021. Previously, he was deputy chief executive officer and chief financial officer of Air Canada since January 1, 2019, after being executive vice president and chief financial officer of Air Canada since October 2007. He was named Canada’s CFO of the Year for 2017 by Financial Executives International Canada (FEI Canada), PwC Canada and Robert Half. He served as president of Hudson’s Bay Company from 2006 to 2007, and as executive vice president and chief financial officer from 2001 to 2006. Prior to Joiningjoining Hudson’s Bay Company in 2001, he held senior executive financial positions at other large international corporations, including Moore Corporation in Chicago, Silcorp Limited and the UCS Group (a division of Imasco Limited).

 

Mr. Rousseau currently serves on the board of EnerCareAir Canada (TSX). He previously served on the board of directors of Chorus Aviation Inc. (TSX). until June 2020 and of Enercare Inc. (TSX) until November 2018.

 

Director qualifications:

 

•  Management/operating experience — experienced director and executive with large publicly-traded companies

 

•  Professional services & financial/accounting experience — currently chief—chief financial officer with Canada’s largest airline; chartered professional accountant

David H. Wilkins

Age: 69

Director since: 2010

Ambassador Wilkins has served on (named Fellow by the Company’s board since the emergence date.

He was nominated by President George W. Bush as United States ambassador to Canada in 2005, a position he held until January 20, 2009. Before this appointment, he practiced law for 34 years in Greenville, South Carolina, and has extensive experience in civil litigation and appellate practice. He was elected to the South Carolina HouseCanadian Institute of Representatives in 1980 and served 25 years, culminating in his service as speaker of the House. He is currently a partner at Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP and chairs the Public Policy and International Law practice group.

He serves on no other public company board of directors, but serves on other private company boards.

Director qualifications:

•     Professional services — experienced lawyer in public policy and international law

•     Politics/government relations — former U.S. ambassador to Canada and elected representativeChartered Accountants, Ontario)

Item 2 — Vote on the Ratification of the Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

The audit committee appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the Company’scompany’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.2021. Our organizational documents do not require that our stockholders ratify the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm, but we do so because we believe it is a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the audit committee will reconsider whether to retain PwC, but still may retain them. Even if the appointment is ratified, the audit committee may change, in its discretion, the appointment at any time if it determines that it would be in the best interests of our Companycompany and our stockholders to do so.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services

The audit committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services performed by the Company’scompany’s independent registered public accounting firm, including audit-related, tax and other services. The audit committee pre-approved all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by PwC in 2015.2020.

The Company’scompany’s chief financial officer, chief accounting officer (or another officer designated by the board) and the independent registered public accounting firm must submit to the audit committee a request to provide any service that requires pre-approval. Each request must include a statement as to whether the independent registered public accounting firm and the submitting officer view the provision of the requested services as consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence. The request must be sufficiently detailed to enable the audit committee to precisely identify the services requested. The audit committee may delegate pre-approval authority to its chair or one or more other committee members, but not to management. Any committee member with delegated authority must report all pre-approval decisions to the audit committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Other Information

A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is expected to be present at the annual meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

Audit Fees and All Other Fees

Fees paid. The following table contains certain information on the fees paid to PwC for professional services rendered in the years ended December 31, 2015,2020, and 2014,2019, converted from Canadian to U.S. dollars at the average exchange rate in the applicable year.

 

Fee category

  2015
fees
   2014
fees
   2020
fees
   2019
fees
 
  (in thousands)   (in thousands) 

Audit fees

  $2,474    $2,711    $2,109   $2,055 

Audit-related fees

   41     43     74    181 

Tax fees

   16     17     127    119 

All other fees

   59     47     84    86 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total fees

  $2,589    $2,818    $2,394    2,441 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

  

Audit fees. Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered in respect of the audits of annual consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting for the years indicated, review of interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and other services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

 

  

Audit-related fees. Audit-related fees consist primarily of fees for other attestation engagements in respect of the fiscal years indicated.

  

Tax fees. Tax fees in each of 20152020 and 20142019 consisted primarily of tax compliance services for certain of our subsidiaries.

 

  

All other fees. All other fees in each of 20152020 and 20142019 consist mainly of translation services for the Company’scompany’s periodic reports.

Board Recommendation

The board unanimously recommends a vote FOR ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 20162021 fiscal year. Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicited by the board will be voted FOR ratification of the appointment.

Item 3 — Advisory voteVote to approve executive compensationApprove Executive Compensation

Rule 14a-21 under the Exchange Act requires that we give our stockholders the ability to cast a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers. This vote is commonly referred to as the “say-on-pay”“say-on-pay” vote. At our 20112017 annual meeting, a majority of stockholders voted, consistent with the recommendation of the Company’scompany’s board of directors, to hold a stockholder advisory vote on a resolution to approve the compensation of the Company’scompany’s named executive officers annually. Accordingly, we intend to continue to provide annual say-on-pay votes.

The compensation of our executive officers is based on a design that ties a substantial percentage of an executive’s compensation to the attainment of financial and other performance measures that, the board believes, servesserve to promote the creation of long-term stockholder value and to position the Companycompany for long-term success. As described more fully in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, the mix of fixed and performance-based compensation and short-term and long-term incentive awards is designed to enable the Companycompany to attract and retain top quality executive talent while, at the same time, creating a close relationship

between performance and compensation. Our human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee and the board believe that the design of the program and the compensation awarded to our named executive officers thereunder fulfill this objective.

We are asking for stockholder approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, as we have disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with SEC rules. The compensation disclosures are contained under the headingCompensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the narrative discussion accompanying the compensation tables. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the policies and practices described in this proxy statement.

Accordingly, the board is requesting your approval of the following non-binding resolution:

RESOLVED, that the Company’scompany’s stockholders approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’scompany’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the proxy statement for this annual meeting pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the 20152020 Summary Compensation Table, the other related tables and the accompanying narrative.

This vote is advisory and therefore not binding on the Company,company, our human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee, or the board. Nevertheless, the board and human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee value the opinions of our stockholders and will review the voting results in connection with their ongoing evaluation of the Company’scompany’s compensation programs.

Board Recommendation

The board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the approval of the Company’scompany’s executive compensation. Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicited by the board will be voted FOR this proposal.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The audit committee of the board of directors oversees our financial reporting, internal controls and audit function process on behalf of the board. The Company’scompany’s management is responsible for the financial statements and for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting.

In carrying out its oversight responsibilities, the audit committee has reviewed and discussed with management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015.2020. The audit committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or the “PCAOB.” The audit committee has received from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent auditors’ communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and the audit committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the firm’s independence.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the audit committee recommended to the board that the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015,2020, be included in the Company’s 2015company’s 2020 annual report on Form 10-K for filing with the SEC.

Suzanne Blanchet

Jennifer C. Dolan

Richard D. Falconer

Alain Rhéaume (chair)

Michael S. Rousseau (chair)

DELINQUENTSECTION 16 B16(ENEFICIALA OWNERSHIP) REPORTING COMPLIANCEEPORTS

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’scompany’s directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders to file reports of holdings and transactions in common stock with the SEC. Those persons are also required to furnish the Companycompany with copies of all section 16(a) reports they file, which we post on our website at www.resolutefp.com/investors/sec_filings.resolutefp.mediaroom.com/sec-filings.

As a practical matter, the Companycompany assists its directors and officers by monitoring transactions and completing and filing section 16 reports on their behalf. Based on a review of the copies of such reports and on written representations from the Company’scompany’s directors and executive officers, the Companycompany believes that all section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to the Company’scompany’s directors, executive officers and stockholders were complied with during the most recent fiscal year.year, except that the Form 4 filing for Jennifer Dolan that should have been filed no later than April 2, 2020, indicating the vesting and settlement of previously awarded restricted stock units and dividend equivalent units, was inadvertently filed late on July 2, 2020.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AANDND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

None of the individuals who served as members of the human resources and compensation/nominating and governance committee during 20152020 was an officer or employee of the Companycompany during 20152020 or at any time in the past nor had reportable transactions with the Company.company. During 2015,2020, none of the Company’scompany’s executive officers served on the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that had an executive officer serving as a member of the Company’scompany’s board of directors or compensation/nominating and governance committee.

OTHER BUSINESS

There is no other matter that the board currently intends to present, or has reason to believe others will present, at the annual meeting. If other matters come before the meeting, the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy will vote on them in accordance with their best judgment.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FFOROR INCLUSION IINN NEXT YEARS PROXY

To be considered for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement, stockholder proposals submitted in accordance with the SEC’s Rule 14a-8 must be received at our principal executive offices no later than the close of business on December 28, 2016.10, 2021. Proposals should be addressed to the corporate secretary, Resolute Forest Products Inc., 111 Duke Street,Robert-Bourassa Boulevard, Suite 5000, Montréal, Québec, CanadaMontreal, Quebec, H3C 2M1.2M1, Canada.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FFOROR 20172022 ANNUAL MEETING

Our by-laws require that any stockholder proposal that is not submitted for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement under SEC Rule 14a-8 but instead is sought to be presented directly at the 20172022 annual meeting be made by way of a “notice of business,” as further described in the by-laws. To be timely, the notice of business must be delivered personally or mailed to, and received at, our principal executive offices, addressed to the corporate secretary, by no earlier than 90 days and no later than 60 days before the first anniversary of the date of the prior year’s annual meeting of stockholders. Accordingly, a notice of business must be received no earlier than March 3, 2017February 20, 2022, and no later than April 2, 2017.March 22, 2022. The notice of business should be addressed to the corporate secretary, Resolute Forest Products Inc., 111 Duke Street,Robert-Bourassa Boulevard, Suite 5000, Montréal, Québec, CanadaMontreal, Quebec, H3C 2M1.2M1, Canada.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

We will furnish, without charge to a stockholder, a copy of the annual report on Form 10-K (including the financial statements and financial schedules incorporated by reference therein but not including the exhibits, which are available upon payment of a reasonable fee) for the year ended December 31, 2015,2020, filed with the SEC. A copy of the report can be obtained upon written request to the Companycompany at Corporate Secretary, Resolute Forest Products Inc., 111 Duke Street,Robert-Bourassa Boulevard, Suite 5000, Montréal, Québec, CanadaMontreal, Quebec, H3C 2M1.2M1, Canada. The annual report on Form 10-K and all of the Company’scompany’s filings with the SEC can be accessed through our website at www.resolutefp.com/investors/sec_filings.resolutefp.mediaroom.com/sec-filings.

LOGOLOGO

resolute

Forest Products

C123456789

IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

000004

000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext

ENDORSEMENT LINE SACKPACK

000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext

000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext

MR A SAMPLE

Electronic Voting Instructions

DESIGNATION (IF ANY)

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

ADD 1

Instead of mailingOF STOCKHOLDERS OF RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC. May 21, 2021 With e-Consent, you can quickly access your proxy you may choose onematerial, statements and other eligible documents online. Enroll today via www.astfinancial.com to enjoy online access. NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIAL: The notice of meeting, proxy statement and proxy card are available at http://www.astproxyportal.com/ast/RFP_EN Please sign, date and mail your proxy card in the voting

ADDenvelope provided as soon as possible. Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided. 00003333333330001000 0 052121 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” ALL THE NOMINEES LISTED AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2

methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

ADD 3

ADD 4

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

ADD 5

Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by

ADD 6

1:00 a.m., Central Time, on June 1, 2016.

Vote by Internet

Go to www.envisionreports.com/RFP

Or scan the QR code with your smartphone

Follow the steps outlined on the secure website

Vote by telephone

Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories &

Canada on a touch tone telephone

Call 1-781-575-2300 outside of the USA, US Territories & Canada on

Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in

X

a touch tone telephone. Standard rates will apply.

this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.

Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message

Annual Meeting Proxy Card

1234 5678 9012 345

IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH – 3. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTIONPROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

A Proposals — PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE [x] The board recommends a vote FOR all nomineesannual meeting is being held online due to the public health impact of the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19). Stockholders of record as of March 23, 2021, will be able to attend and FOR Proposals 2participate in the annual meeting online by accessing https://web.lumiagm.com/295854943. Please monitor our annual meeting website at www.resolutefp.com/Investors for any updates regarding our online annual meeting. To join the annual meeting, you will need to have your 11-digit control number, which is included on the notice of internet availability and 3.

proxy card, and the following password: resolute2021. To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method. [    ] 1. Election of directors:

For

Against Abstain

For

Against Abstain

For

Against

Abstain

+

01 - Michel P. Desbiens

02 -Directors: NOMINEES: FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN Randall C. Benson [    ] [    ] [    ] Suzanne Blanchet [    ] [    ] [    ] Jennifer C. Dolan

03 - Richard D. Falconer

04 - Richard Garneau

05 - Jeffrey A. Hearn

06 - [    ] [    ] [    ] Remi G. Lalonde [    ] [    ] [    ] Bradley P. Martin

07 - [    ] [    ] [    ] Alain Rhéaume

08 - [    ] [    ] [    ] Michael S. Rousseau

09 - David H. Wilkins

For

Against

Abstain

For

Against

Abstain

[    ] [    ] [    ] 2. Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP appointment

appointment. [    ] [    ] [    ] 3. Advisory vote to approve executive compensation

(“say-on-pay”)

B Non-Voting Items

Change. [    ] [    ] [    ] MARK “X” HERE IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING. [    ] Signature of Address — Please print your new address below.

Comments — Please print your comments below.

Meeting Attendance

Mark the box to the right

if you plan to attend the

Annual Meeting.

C Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below

PleaseStockholder Date: Signature of Stockholder Date: Note: please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint ownersyour name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer,attorney, trustee guardian, or custodian,guardian, please give full title.

C 1234567890

J N T

MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE

140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND

MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND

1UP X

2756151

MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND

+

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.

Signature 1 — Please keep signature withintitle as such. If the box.signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.

Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.

02BXRC


LOGOLOGO

IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

Proxy -[    ] RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.

Resolute Forest Products Inc. 111 Duke Street, Suite 5000 Montréal, Québec Canada H3C 2M1

Proxy solicited by Resolute Forest Products Inc.for Annual Meeting of Stockholders on behalfMay 21, 2021 Solicited on Behalf of the boardBoard of directors for the 2016 annual meeting of stockholders to be held on June 1, 2016.

Richard GarneauDirectors Remi G. Lalonde, Sylvain A. Girard and Jacques P. Vachon (the “proxies”“Proxies”), or eitherany of them, each with the full power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and vote the shares of the undersigned, with all the powers thatwhich the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the 2016 annual meetingAnnual Meeting of stockholdersStockholders of Resolute Forest Products Inc. to be held online through a virtual web conference at https://web.lumiagm.com/295854943 on June 1, 2016 andMay 21, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) or at any postponement or adjournment or postponement thereof.

The proxies shall vote subject to Shares represented by this proxy will be voted as directed by the direction indicatedstockholder on the reverse side of this proxy card. If no such direction isdirections are indicated, the proxiesProxies will have authority to vote asFOR the boardelection of directors recommends. The proxiesthe Board of Directors and FOR items 2-3. In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion upon such other business as may properly come before the meetingmeeting. (Continued and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

The board of directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed, FOR the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2016 fiscal year and FOR approval of the Company’s executive compensation.

(Items to be voted appearsigned on the reverse side.)side) 1.1 14475